TSTP Solution File: LAT287+4 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : LAT287+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:28:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 26.77s 7.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 26.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 33 ( 17 unt; 9 nHn; 33 RR)
% Number of literals : 71 ( 5 equ; 36 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_532,plain,
( k1_pre_topc(X1) = k1_xboole_0
| ~ l1_struct_0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zjuzreg0/lgb.p',i_0_532) ).
cnf(i_0_978,plain,
( l1_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zjuzreg0/lgb.p',i_0_978) ).
cnf(i_0_2862,negated_conjecture,
~ m1_subset_1(k1_pre_topc(esk417_0),u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(esk417_0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zjuzreg0/lgb.p',i_0_2862) ).
cnf(i_0_2863,negated_conjecture,
l1_pre_topc(esk417_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zjuzreg0/lgb.p',i_0_2863) ).
cnf(i_0_539,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zjuzreg0/lgb.p',i_0_539) ).
cnf(i_0_1559,plain,
v1_xboole_0(k1_xboole_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zjuzreg0/lgb.p',i_0_1559) ).
cnf(i_0_2176,plain,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| v1_xboole_0(X2)
| m1_subset_1(X3,X1)
| ~ m2_subset_1(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zjuzreg0/lgb.p',i_0_2176) ).
cnf(i_0_6053,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m2_subset_1(k1_pre_topc(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)),k1_lopclset(X1))
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zjuzreg0/lgb.p',i_0_6053) ).
cnf(i_0_5852,plain,
~ v1_xboole_0(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zjuzreg0/lgb.p',i_0_5852) ).
cnf(i_0_2576,plain,
( u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(X1)) = k1_lopclset(X1)
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zjuzreg0/lgb.p',i_0_2576) ).
cnf(i_0_2864,negated_conjecture,
v2_pre_topc(esk417_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zjuzreg0/lgb.p',i_0_2864) ).
cnf(i_0_2865,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk417_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zjuzreg0/lgb.p',i_0_2865) ).
cnf(i_0_892,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_subset_1(k1_lopclset(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))))
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zjuzreg0/lgb.p',i_0_892) ).
cnf(c_0_6067,plain,
( k1_pre_topc(X1) = k1_xboole_0
| ~ l1_struct_0(X1) ),
i_0_532 ).
cnf(c_0_6068,plain,
( l1_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1) ),
i_0_978 ).
cnf(c_0_6069,negated_conjecture,
~ m1_subset_1(k1_pre_topc(esk417_0),u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(esk417_0))),
i_0_2862 ).
cnf(c_0_6070,plain,
( k1_pre_topc(X1) = k1_xboole_0
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6067,c_0_6068]) ).
cnf(c_0_6071,negated_conjecture,
l1_pre_topc(esk417_0),
i_0_2863 ).
cnf(c_0_6072,negated_conjecture,
~ m1_subset_1(k1_xboole_0,u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(esk417_0))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6069,c_0_6070]),c_0_6071])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6073,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X1) ),
i_0_539 ).
cnf(c_0_6074,plain,
v1_xboole_0(k1_xboole_0),
i_0_1559 ).
cnf(c_0_6075,plain,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| v1_xboole_0(X2)
| m1_subset_1(X3,X1)
| ~ m2_subset_1(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
i_0_2176 ).
cnf(c_0_6076,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m2_subset_1(k1_pre_topc(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)),k1_lopclset(X1))
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1) ),
i_0_6053 ).
cnf(c_0_6077,plain,
~ v1_xboole_0(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
i_0_5852 ).
cnf(c_0_6078,plain,
( u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(X1)) = k1_lopclset(X1)
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1) ),
i_0_2576 ).
cnf(c_0_6079,negated_conjecture,
v2_pre_topc(esk417_0),
i_0_2864 ).
cnf(c_0_6080,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk417_0),
i_0_2865 ).
cnf(c_0_6081,negated_conjecture,
~ v1_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(esk417_0))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6072,c_0_6073]),c_0_6074])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6082,plain,
( v1_xboole_0(k1_lopclset(X1))
| m1_subset_1(k1_pre_topc(X1),k1_lopclset(X1))
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(k1_lopclset(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))))
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6075,c_0_6076]),c_0_6077]) ).
cnf(c_0_6083,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_subset_1(k1_lopclset(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))))
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1) ),
i_0_892 ).
cnf(c_0_6084,negated_conjecture,
~ m1_subset_1(k1_pre_topc(esk417_0),k1_lopclset(esk417_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6069,c_0_6078]),c_0_6079]),c_0_6071])]),c_0_6080]) ).
cnf(c_0_6085,negated_conjecture,
~ v1_xboole_0(k1_lopclset(esk417_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6081,c_0_6078]),c_0_6079]),c_0_6071])]),c_0_6080]) ).
cnf(c_0_6086,plain,
$false,
inference(cdclpropres,[status(thm)],[c_0_6082,c_0_6083,c_0_6084,c_0_6085,c_0_6080,c_0_6079,c_0_6071]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : LAT287+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 10:51:29 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 1.28/1.52 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.52 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 1.28/1.52 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 1.28/1.52 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 26.77/7.43 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 26.77/7.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 26.77/7.43 # Trying AutoSched0 for 149 seconds
% 26.77/7.43 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 26.77/7.43 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
% 26.77/7.43 #
% 26.77/7.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.037 s
% 26.77/7.43 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 26.77/7.43 # SatCheck found unsatisfiable ground set
% 26.77/7.43
% 26.77/7.43 # Proof found!
% 26.77/7.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 26.77/7.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 26.77/7.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 26.77/7.43
% 26.77/7.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 26.77/7.43 # User time : 1.788 s
% 26.77/7.43 # System time : 0.071 s
% 26.77/7.43 # Total time : 1.859 s
% 26.77/7.43 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 26.77/7.43
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------