TSTP Solution File: LAT286+4 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : LAT286+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:46:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.48s 113.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   90 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  104 (  42   ~;  37   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   2 sgn  19   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t15_lopclset,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => m1_subset_1(k2_pre_topc(X1),u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t15_lopclset) ).

fof(t13_lopclset,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(X1)) = k1_lopclset(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t13_lopclset) ).

fof(redefinition_m2_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X1)
        & ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
        & m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) )
     => ! [X3] :
          ( m2_subset_1(X3,X1,X2)
        <=> m1_subset_1(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+7.ax',redefinition_m2_subset_1) ).

fof(t8_lopclset,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => m2_subset_1(k2_pre_topc(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)),k1_lopclset(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t8_lopclset) ).

fof(fc1_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ v1_xboole_0(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+7.ax',fc1_subset_1) ).

fof(dt_k1_lopclset,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => m1_subset_1(k1_lopclset(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',dt_k1_lopclset) ).

fof(fc1_lopclset,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => ~ v1_xboole_0(k1_lopclset(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fc1_lopclset) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
          & v2_pre_topc(X1)
          & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
       => m1_subset_1(k2_pre_topc(X1),u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(X1))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t15_lopclset]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0)
    & v2_pre_topc(esk1_0)
    & l1_pre_topc(esk1_0)
    & ~ m1_subset_1(k2_pre_topc(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(esk1_0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X2)
      | ~ v2_pre_topc(X2)
      | ~ l1_pre_topc(X2)
      | u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(X2)) = k1_lopclset(X2) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t13_lopclset])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X6] :
      ( ( ~ m2_subset_1(X6,X4,X5)
        | m1_subset_1(X6,X5)
        | v1_xboole_0(X4)
        | v1_xboole_0(X5)
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X4)) )
      & ( ~ m1_subset_1(X6,X5)
        | m2_subset_1(X6,X4,X5)
        | v1_xboole_0(X4)
        | v1_xboole_0(X5)
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X4)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[redefinition_m2_subset_1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X2)
      | ~ v2_pre_topc(X2)
      | ~ l1_pre_topc(X2)
      | m2_subset_1(k2_pre_topc(X2),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2)),k1_lopclset(X2)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t8_lopclset])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X2] : ~ v1_xboole_0(k1_zfmisc_1(X2)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fc1_subset_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X2)
      | ~ l1_pre_topc(X2)
      | m1_subset_1(k1_lopclset(X2),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2)))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dt_k1_lopclset])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X2)
      | ~ v2_pre_topc(X2)
      | ~ l1_pre_topc(X2)
      | ~ v1_xboole_0(k1_lopclset(X2)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fc1_lopclset])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ m1_subset_1(k2_pre_topc(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(esk1_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( u1_struct_0(k6_lopclset(X1)) = k1_lopclset(X1)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    v2_pre_topc(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    l1_pre_topc(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( v1_xboole_0(X1)
    | v1_xboole_0(X2)
    | m1_subset_1(X3,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    | ~ m2_subset_1(X3,X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( m2_subset_1(k2_pre_topc(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)),k1_lopclset(X1))
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ~ v1_xboole_0(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(k1_lopclset(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))))
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ v1_xboole_0(k1_lopclset(X1))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ m1_subset_1(k2_pre_topc(esk1_0),k1_lopclset(esk1_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m1_subset_1(k2_pre_topc(X1),k1_lopclset(X1))
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),c_0_19]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : LAT286+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 08:43:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.98/25.04  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.98/25.06  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.06/38.13  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.06/38.49  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.11/49.26  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.25/74.33  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.33/85.63  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.33/88.09  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.39/97.36  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.41/101.31  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.48/113.64  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 2.48/113.64  # Preprocessing time       : 8.576 s
% 2.48/113.64  
% 2.48/113.64  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 2.48/113.64  # OLD status GaveUp
% 2.48/113.64  # Parsed axioms                        : 32138
% 2.48/113.64  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # Initial clauses                      : 96493
% 2.48/113.64  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8828
% 2.48/113.64  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 87665
% 2.48/113.64  # Processed clauses                    : 16
% 2.48/113.64  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 2.48/113.64  # ...remaining for further processing  : 14
% 2.48/113.64  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 87649
% 2.48/113.64  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # Current number of processed clauses  : 14
% 2.48/113.64  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 2.48/113.64  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.48/113.64  #    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 2.48/113.64  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 2.48/113.64  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 2.48/113.64  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 2.48/113.64  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 2.48/113.64  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 2.48/113.64  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.48/113.64  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9564503
% 2.48/113.64  
% 2.48/113.64  # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.48/113.64  # User time                : 13.111 s
% 2.48/113.64  # System time              : 0.299 s
% 2.48/113.64  # Total time               : 13.410 s
% 2.48/113.64  # Maximum resident set size: 384892 pages
% 2.48/113.65  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f6eb5f7f05126ea361481ae651a4823314e3d740 for 23 seconds:
% 2.48/113.65  
% 2.48/113.65  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 2.48/113.65  # OLD status Res
% 2.48/113.65  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 2.48/113.65  # Preprocessing time       : 1.269 s
% 2.48/113.65  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a172c605141d0894bf6fdc293a5220c6c2a32117 for 23 seconds:
% 2.48/113.65  # Preprocessing time       : 8.379 s
% 2.48/113.65  
% 2.48/113.65  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 2.48/113.65  # OLD status GaveUp
% 2.48/113.65  # Parsed axioms                        : 32138
% 2.48/113.65  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Initial clauses                      : 96493
% 2.48/113.65  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8828
% 2.48/113.65  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 87665
% 2.48/113.65  # Processed clauses                    : 16
% 2.48/113.65  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # ...remaining for further processing  : 16
% 2.48/113.65  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 87649
% 2.48/113.65  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Current number of processed clauses  : 16
% 2.48/113.65  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 14
% 2.48/113.65  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.48/113.65  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 2.48/113.65  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 2.48/113.65  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 2.48/113.65  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 2.48/113.65  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9564526
% 2.48/113.65  
% 2.48/113.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.48/113.65  # User time                : 12.960 s
% 2.48/113.65  # System time              : 0.291 s
% 2.48/113.65  # Total time               : 13.251 s
% 2.48/113.65  # Maximum resident set size: 404528 pages
% 2.48/113.65  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f8b0f932169414d689b89e2a8b18d4600533b975 for 23 seconds:
% 2.48/113.65  # Preprocessing time       : 8.378 s
% 2.48/113.65  
% 2.48/113.65  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 2.48/113.65  # OLD status GaveUp
% 2.48/113.65  # Parsed axioms                        : 32138
% 2.48/113.65  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Initial clauses                      : 96493
% 2.48/113.65  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8828
% 2.48/113.65  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 87665
% 2.48/113.65  # Processed clauses                    : 16
% 2.48/113.65  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # ...subsumed                          : 5
% 2.48/113.65  # ...remaining for further processing  : 11
% 2.48/113.65  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 87650
% 2.48/113.65  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 2.48/113.65  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1
% 2.48/113.65  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Current number of processed clauses  : 10
% 2.48/113.65  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 2.48/113.65  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.48/113.65  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 2.48/113.65  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 2.48/113.65  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 2.48/113.65  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 2.48/113.65  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 2.48/113.65  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 2.48/113.65  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9564495
% 2.48/113.65  
% 2.48/113.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.48/113.65  # User time                : 12.977 s
% 2.48/113.65  # System time              : 0.274 s
% 2.48/113.65  # Total time               : 13.251 s
% 2.48/113.65  # Maximum resident set size: 368648 pages
% 2.48/113.65  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_fc511518e5f98a6b2c7baef820b71b6d1abb3e55 for 23 seconds:
% 2.48/113.65  
% 2.48/113.65  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 2.48/113.65  # OLD status Res
% 2.48/113.65  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,02,80,1.0)
% 2.48/113.65  # Preprocessing time       : 1.116 s
% 2.48/113.65  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_95b56b3f38545d2cfee43b45856d192a814b65d5 for 23 seconds:
% 2.48/113.65  # Preprocessing time       : 8.141 s
% 2.48/113.65  
% 2.48/113.65  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 2.48/113.65  # OLD status GaveUp
% 2.48/113.65  # Parsed axioms                        : 32138
% 2.48/113.65  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Initial clauses                      : 96493
% 2.48/113.65  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8828
% 2.48/113.65  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 87665
% 2.48/113.65  # Processed clauses                    : 16
% 2.48/113.65  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 2.48/113.65  # ...remaining for further processing  : 15
% 2.48/113.65  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 2.48/113.65  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 87651
% 2.48/113.65  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Generated clauses                    : 2
% 2.48/113.65  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 2
% 2.48/113.65  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Paramodulations                      : 1
% 2.48/113.65  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 2.48/113.65  # Current number of processed clauses  : 14
% 2.48/113.65  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
% 2.48/113.65  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.48/113.65  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 2.48/113.65  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
% 2.48/113.65  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 2.48/113.65  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4
% 2.48/113.65  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 2.48/113.65  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 2.48/113.65  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 2.48/113.65  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9564539
% 2.48/113.65  
% 2.48/113.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.48/113.65  # User time                : 12.650 s
% 2.48/113.65  # System time              : 0.300 s
% 2.48/113.65  # Total time               : 12.950 s
% 2.48/113.65  # Maximum resident set size: 381428 pages
% 2.48/113.65  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_6017f334107ca4679a9978dd19d7c76a8bd36e48 for 23 seconds:
% 2.48/113.65  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.4,,02,20000,1.0)
% 2.48/113.65  # Preprocessing time       : 1.125 s
% 2.48/113.65  
% 2.48/113.65  # Proof found!
% 2.48/113.65  # SZS status Theorem
% 2.48/113.65  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.48/113.65  # Proof object total steps             : 28
% 2.48/113.65  # Proof object clause steps            : 13
% 2.48/113.65  # Proof object formula steps           : 15
% 2.48/113.65  # Proof object conjectures             : 9
% 2.48/113.65  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 6
% 2.48/113.65  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 2.48/113.65  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 10
% 2.48/113.65  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
% 2.48/113.65  # Proof object generating inferences   : 3
% 2.48/113.65  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 11
% 2.48/113.65  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 2.48/113.65  # Parsed axioms                        : 32138
% 2.48/113.65  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 31608
% 2.48/113.65  # Initial clauses                      : 1104
% 2.48/113.65  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 39
% 2.48/113.65  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 1065
% 2.48/113.65  # Processed clauses                    : 19273
% 2.48/113.65  # ...of these trivial                  : 215
% 2.48/113.65  # ...subsumed                          : 12879
% 2.48/113.65  # ...remaining for further processing  : 6179
% 2.48/113.65  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1272
% 2.48/113.65  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 227571
% 2.48/113.65  # Backward-subsumed                    : 267
% 2.48/113.65  # Backward-rewritten                   : 369
% 2.48/113.65  # Generated clauses                    : 441798
% 2.48/113.65  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 409593
% 2.48/113.65  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 11954
% 2.48/113.65  # Paramodulations                      : 438495
% 2.48/113.65  # Factorizations                       : 20
% 2.48/113.65  # Equation resolutions                 : 1543
% 2.48/113.65  # Current number of processed clauses  : 5523
% 2.48/113.65  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 366
% 2.48/113.65  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 25
% 2.48/113.65  #    Negative unit clauses             : 255
% 2.48/113.65  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4877
% 2.48/113.65  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 132600
% 2.48/113.65  # ...number of literals in the above   : 588855
% 2.48/113.65  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Current number of archived clauses   : 643
% 2.48/113.65  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8580867
% 2.48/113.65  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3266913
% 2.48/113.65  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 23462
% 2.48/113.65  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 494133
% 2.48/113.65  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2280
% 2.48/113.65  # BW rewrite match successes           : 494
% 2.48/113.65  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.48/113.65  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 6910763
% 2.48/113.65  
% 2.48/113.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.48/113.65  # User time                : 11.506 s
% 2.48/113.65  # System time              : 0.168 s
% 2.48/113.65  # Total time               : 11.674 s
% 2.48/113.65  # Maximum resident set size: 196900 pages
% 2.48/120.39  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.48/120.41  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.48/120.41  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.48/120.41  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.48/120.41  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.48/120.41  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.48/120.41  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.48/120.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.48/120.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.48/120.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.48/120.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.48/120.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.48/120.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.48/122.19  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.48/122.21  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.48/122.21  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.48/122.22  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.48/122.22  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.48/122.23  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.48/122.23  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.48/122.23  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.48/122.23  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.48/122.24  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.48/122.24  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.48/124.33  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.48/124.35  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.48/124.35  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.48/124.35  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.48/124.35  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.48/124.36  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.48/124.36  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.48/124.37  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.48/124.37  eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.48/124.37  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.48/124.37  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------