TSTP Solution File: LAT281-2 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : LAT281-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:50:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.42s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (   0 equ;  10 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;  13 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_Relation_Otrans(u,v)
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(w,x,v,v),u,tc_prod(v,v))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(x,y,v,v),u,tc_prod(v,v))
    | c_in(c_Pair(w,y,v,v),u,tc_prod(v,v)) ),
    file('LAT281-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(u,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(v,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | c_Relation_Otrans(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(u,v,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),v) ),
    file('LAT281-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    file('LAT281-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    equal(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),v_r),
    file('LAT281-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    file('LAT281-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_b,v_c,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    file('LAT281-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_c,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    file('LAT281-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,plain,
    ( ~ c_Relation_Otrans(v_r,t_a)
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(u,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
    | c_in(c_Pair(u,v_c,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[6,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:6.0,1.1')] ).

cnf(14,plain,
    ( ~ c_Relation_Otrans(v_r,t_a)
    | c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_c,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,8]),
    [iquote('0:Res:5.0,8.1')] ).

cnf(15,plain,
    ~ c_Relation_Otrans(v_r,t_a),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[14,7]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:14.1,7.0')] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | c_Relation_Otrans(v_r,t_a) ),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[4,2]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:4.0,2.1')] ).

cnf(18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[17,3,15]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:17.0,17.1,3.0,15.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : LAT281-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 06:50:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.42  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.42  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.42  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.42  SPASS derived 9 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 14 clauses.
% 0.19/0.42  SPASS allocated 63102 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.42  SPASS spent	0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.42  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 12 :
% 0.19/0.42  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.42  Formulae used in the proof : cls_Relation_Otrans__def_0 cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_2 cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0 cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0 cls_conjecture_0 cls_conjecture_1 cls_conjecture_2
% 0.19/0.42  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------