TSTP Solution File: LAT281-2 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : LAT281-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:08:17 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   26 (   2 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   8 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_2,axiom,
    ( c_Relation_Otrans(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X2)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zSiQ50IjoO/E---3.1_4245.p',cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_2) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0,axiom,
    v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zSiQ50IjoO/E---3.1_4245.p',cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0,axiom,
    c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zSiQ50IjoO/E---3.1_4245.p',cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0) ).

cnf(cls_Relation_Otrans__def_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(X5,X4,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2))
    | ~ c_Relation_Otrans(X1,X2)
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X3,X4,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X5,X3,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zSiQ50IjoO/E---3.1_4245.p',cls_Relation_Otrans__def_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zSiQ50IjoO/E---3.1_4245.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_b,v_c,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zSiQ50IjoO/E---3.1_4245.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_c,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zSiQ50IjoO/E---3.1_4245.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    ( c_Relation_Otrans(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X2)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
    cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_2 ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(X5,X4,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2))
    | ~ c_Relation_Otrans(X1,X2)
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X3,X4,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X5,X3,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2)) ),
    cls_Relation_Otrans__def_0 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    c_Relation_Otrans(v_r,t_a),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(v_a,X1,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_b,X1,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_b,v_c,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_c,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    cls_conjecture_2 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.10  % Problem    : LAT281-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 10:47:21 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zSiQ50IjoO/E---3.1_4245.p
% 0.15/0.42  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # sh5l with pid 4332 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.42  # Search class: FHUSF-FFSS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 4339 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.42  # Search class: FHUSF-FFSS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.42  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 7
% 0.15/0.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Initial clauses                      : 7
% 0.15/0.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
% 0.15/0.42  # Processed clauses                    : 17
% 0.15/0.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 17
% 0.15/0.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Generated clauses                    : 4
% 0.15/0.42  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.15/0.42  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Paramodulations                      : 4
% 0.15/0.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.15/0.42  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 10
% 0.15/0.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.15/0.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.15/0.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4
% 0.15/0.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 0.15/0.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 347
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Total time               : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Maximum resident set size: 1656 pages
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.15/0.42  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.42  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------