TSTP Solution File: LAT279-2 by Moca---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Moca---0.1
% Problem : LAT279-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : moca.sh %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:05:50 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.39s
% Output : Proof 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : LAT279-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : moca.sh %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 28 19:35:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.39 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.12/0.39 The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 c_Relation_Oantisym(v_r, t_a) ==> \bottom
% 0.12/0.39 c_in(V_P, c_Tarski_OPartialOrder, tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(T_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ==> c_Relation_Oantisym(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(V_P, T_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit), T_a)
% 0.12/0.39 c_in(v_cl, c_Tarski_OPartialOrder, tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
% 0.12/0.39 v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl, t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit)
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 This holds because
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 E:
% 0.12/0.39 c_in(v_cl, c_Tarski_OPartialOrder, tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) = true__
% 0.12/0.39 f1(c_Relation_Oantisym(v_r, t_a)) = true__
% 0.12/0.39 f1(true__) = false__
% 0.12/0.39 f2(c_in(V_P, c_Tarski_OPartialOrder, tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(T_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit)), V_P, T_a) = true__
% 0.12/0.39 f2(true__, V_P, T_a) = c_Relation_Oantisym(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(V_P, T_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit), T_a)
% 0.12/0.39 v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl, t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit)
% 0.12/0.39 G:
% 0.12/0.39 true__ = false__
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 This holds because
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 c_Relation_Oantisym(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(V_P, T_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit), T_a) -> f2(true__, V_P, T_a)
% 0.12/0.39 c_Relation_Oantisym(v_r, t_a) -> f2(true__, v_cl, t_a)
% 0.12/0.39 c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl, t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit) -> v_r
% 0.12/0.39 c_in(v_cl, c_Tarski_OPartialOrder, tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) -> true__
% 0.12/0.39 f1(c_Relation_Oantisym(v_r, t_a)) -> true__
% 0.12/0.39 f1(true__) -> false__
% 0.12/0.39 f2(c_in(V_P, c_Tarski_OPartialOrder, tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(T_a, tc_Product__Type_Ounit)), V_P, T_a) -> true__
% 0.12/0.39 f2(true__, v_cl, t_a) -> true__
% 0.12/0.39 false__ -> true__
% 0.12/0.39 with the LPO induced by
% 0.12/0.39 c_Relation_Oantisym > f2 > c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder > v_r > v_cl > tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type > c_Tarski_OPartialOrder > c_in > t_a > tc_Product__Type_Ounit > f1 > false__ > true__
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.12/0.39
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------