TSTP Solution File: LAT279-2 by Leo-III---1.7.7

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem  : LAT279-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:27:18 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.49s 1.60s
% Output   : Refutation 2.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   7 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   11 (   2 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   46 (   4   ~;   2   |;   0   &;  40   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (  10   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0   ^;   4   !;   0   ?;   4   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(c_Relation_Oantisym_type,type,
    c_Relation_Oantisym: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(v_r_type,type,
    v_r: $i ).

thf(t_a_type,type,
    t_a: $i ).

thf(c_in_type,type,
    c_in: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(c_Tarski_OPartialOrder_type,type,
    c_Tarski_OPartialOrder: $i ).

thf(tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type_type,type,
    tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(tc_Product__Type_Ounit_type,type,
    tc_Product__Type_Ounit: $i ).

thf(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder_type,type,
    c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder: $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(v_cl_type,type,
    v_cl: $i ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( c_Relation_Oantisym @ v_r @ t_a ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ~ ( c_Relation_Oantisym @ v_r @ t_a ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( c_in @ A @ c_Tarski_OPartialOrder @ ( tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type @ B @ tc_Product__Type_Ounit ) )
      | ( c_Relation_Oantisym @ ( c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder @ A @ B @ tc_Product__Type_Ounit ) @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_1) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( c_in @ A @ c_Tarski_OPartialOrder @ ( tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type @ B @ tc_Product__Type_Ounit ) )
      | ( c_Relation_Oantisym @ ( c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder @ A @ B @ tc_Product__Type_Ounit ) @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    c_in @ v_cl @ c_Tarski_OPartialOrder @ ( tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type @ t_a @ tc_Product__Type_Ounit ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0) ).

thf(9,plain,
    c_in @ v_cl @ c_Tarski_OPartialOrder @ ( tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type @ t_a @ tc_Product__Type_Ounit ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ( v_r
    = ( c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder @ v_cl @ t_a @ tc_Product__Type_Ounit ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( v_r
    = ( c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder @ v_cl @ t_a @ tc_Product__Type_Ounit ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[5,7,9,10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : LAT279-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.15  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu May 18 13:54:55 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.97/0.88  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.11/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (111ms). 
% 1.11/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.66/1.22  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.66/1.22  % [INFO] 	 cvc4 registered as external prover. 
% 1.66/1.22  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.78/1.27  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 3 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.78/1.29  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 3 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.78/1.30  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 1.78/1.30  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.78/1.31  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 2.49/1.60  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 2.49/1.60  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 2.49/1.60  % Time passed: 1067ms (effective reasoning time: 591ms)
% 2.49/1.60  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 2.49/1.60  % Axioms used in derivation (3): cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_1, cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0, cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0
% 2.49/1.60  % No. of inferences in proof: 9
% 2.49/1.60  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1067 ms resp. 591 ms w/o parsing
% 2.75/1.65  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.75/1.65  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------