TSTP Solution File: LAT277-1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : LAT277-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 13:21:33 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 26.74s 4.31s
% Output : Refutation 26.74s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 18 ( 11 ~; 7 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 7 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f98197,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f98191,f2745]) ).
fof(f2745,axiom,
c_in(v_x,v_A,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f98191,plain,
~ c_in(v_x,v_A,t_a),
inference(resolution,[],[f98190,f2743]) ).
fof(f2743,axiom,
c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0) ).
fof(f98190,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
| ~ c_in(v_x,v_A,t_a) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f98169,f82123]) ).
fof(f82123,plain,
( c_Relation_Orefl(v_A,v_r,t_a)
| ~ c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f82119,f2744]) ).
fof(f2744,axiom,
v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0) ).
fof(f82119,plain,
( c_Relation_Orefl(v_A,c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),t_a)
| ~ c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f2739,f2738]) ).
fof(f2738,axiom,
v_A = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0) ).
fof(f2739,axiom,
! [X3,X93] :
( c_Relation_Orefl(c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X93,X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X93,X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X3)
| ~ c_in(X93,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_0) ).
fof(f98169,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ c_Relation_Orefl(X0,v_r,t_a)
| ~ c_in(v_x,X0,t_a) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f2737,f2746]) ).
fof(f2746,axiom,
~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_x,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f2737,axiom,
! [X3,X27,X15,X20] :
( c_in(c_Pair(X15,X15,X3,X3),X20,tc_prod(X3,X3))
| ~ c_in(X15,X27,X3)
| ~ c_Relation_Orefl(X27,X20,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Relation_OreflD_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.12 % Problem : LAT277-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.14 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Apr 29 21:49:24 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % (11954)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.20/0.45 % (11957)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.20/0.46 % (11959)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.46 % (11961)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.46 % (11957)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.46 % (11960)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.46 % (11956)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.46 % (11958)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.46 % (11955)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 1.98/0.73 TRYING [1]
% 5.53/1.22 TRYING [2]
% 7.81/1.54 TRYING [1]
% 9.55/1.79 TRYING [1]
% 11.92/2.14 TRYING [2]
% 12.59/2.27 TRYING [2]
% 26.74/4.29 % (11960)First to succeed.
% 26.74/4.31 % (11960)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 26.74/4.31 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 26.74/4.31 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 26.74/4.31 % (11960)------------------------------
% 26.74/4.31 % (11960)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 26.74/4.31 % (11960)Termination reason: Refutation
% 26.74/4.31
% 26.74/4.31 % (11960)Memory used [KB]: 44400
% 26.74/4.31 % (11960)Time elapsed: 3.837 s
% 26.74/4.31 % (11960)Instructions burned: 6906 (million)
% 26.74/4.31 % (11960)------------------------------
% 26.74/4.31 % (11960)------------------------------
% 26.74/4.31 % (11954)Success in time 3.898 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------