TSTP Solution File: LAT276-2 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : LAT276-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:50:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.40s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : LAT276-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 15:27:22 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.40  
% 0.18/0.40  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.18/0.40  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.40  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.40  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.18/0.40  SPASS derived 20 clauses, backtracked 10 clauses, performed 3 splits and kept 37 clauses.
% 0.18/0.40  SPASS allocated 63145 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.40  SPASS spent	0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.40  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.18/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.40  
% 0.18/0.40  
% 0.18/0.40  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 47 :
% 0.18/0.40  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.40  1[0:Inp] || c_in(u,v,w)* c_lessequals(v,x,tc_set(w))*+ -> c_in(u,x,w)*.
% 0.18/0.40  2[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),v_A)**.
% 0.18/0.40  3[0:Inp] || c_in(u,v_A,t_a) c_lessequals(v,v_A,tc_set(t_a))+ -> c_in(v_sko__4mP(u,v,v_r),v,t_a)* c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Olub(v,v_cl,t_a),u,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))*.
% 0.18/0.40  4[0:Inp] || c_in(u,v_A,t_a) c_lessequals(v,v_A,tc_set(t_a)) c_in(c_Pair(v_sko__4mP(u,v,v_r),u,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))* -> c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Olub(v,v_cl,t_a),u,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)).
% 0.18/0.40  5[0:Inp] || c_in(u,v,t_a) c_lessequals(v,v_A,tc_set(t_a)) -> c_in(c_Pair(u,c_Tarski_Olub(v,v_cl,t_a),t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))*.
% 0.18/0.40  6[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),v_r)**.
% 0.18/0.40  7[0:Inp] ||  -> c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a))*.
% 0.18/0.40  8[0:Inp] || c_in(u,v_S,t_a) c_in(c_Pair(v_xa,c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),t_a,t_a),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(t_a,t_a))* -> c_in(c_Pair(u,v_xa,t_a,t_a),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(t_a,t_a))*.
% 0.18/0.40  9[0:Inp] ||  -> c_in(v_xa,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),t_a)* c_in(v_xa,v_S,t_a).
% 0.18/0.40  10[0:Inp] || c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),v_xa,t_a,t_a),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(t_a,t_a))* -> c_in(v_xa,v_S,t_a).
% 0.18/0.40  11[0:Inp] || c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),v_xa,t_a,t_a),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(t_a,t_a))* c_in(c_Pair(v_xa,c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),t_a,t_a),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) -> .
% 0.18/0.40  12[0:Inp] || c_in(u,v_S,t_a) -> c_in(c_Pair(u,v_xa,t_a,t_a),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(t_a,t_a))* c_in(v_xa,v_S,t_a).
% 0.18/0.40  13[0:Rew:2.0,9.0] ||  -> c_in(v_xa,v_S,t_a) c_in(v_xa,v_A,t_a)*.
% 0.18/0.40  14[0:Rew:6.0,10.0] || c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),v_xa,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))* -> c_in(v_xa,v_S,t_a).
% 0.18/0.40  15[0:Rew:6.0,12.1] || c_in(u,v_S,t_a) -> c_in(v_xa,v_S,t_a) c_in(c_Pair(u,v_xa,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))*.
% 0.18/0.40  16[0:Rew:6.0,11.1,6.0,11.0] || c_in(c_Pair(v_xa,c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),v_xa,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))* -> .
% 0.18/0.40  17[0:Rew:6.0,8.2,6.0,8.1] || c_in(u,v_S,t_a) c_in(c_Pair(v_xa,c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))*+ -> c_in(c_Pair(u,v_xa,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))*.
% 0.18/0.40  18[1:Spt:15.0,15.2] || c_in(u,v_S,t_a) -> c_in(c_Pair(u,v_xa,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))*.
% 0.18/0.40  19[2:Spt:14.0] || c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),v_xa,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))* -> .
% 0.18/0.40  23[0:Res:7.0,1.1] || c_in(u,v_S,t_a) -> c_in(u,v_A,t_a)*.
% 0.18/0.40  24[0:MRR:13.0,23.0] ||  -> c_in(v_xa,v_A,t_a)*.
% 0.18/0.40  25[0:Res:7.0,3.1] || c_in(u,v_A,t_a) -> c_in(v_sko__4mP(u,v_S,v_r),v_S,t_a) c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),u,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))*.
% 0.18/0.40  26[2:Res:25.2,19.0] || c_in(v_xa,v_A,t_a) -> c_in(v_sko__4mP(v_xa,v_S,v_r),v_S,t_a)*.
% 0.18/0.40  27[2:MRR:26.0,24.0] ||  -> c_in(v_sko__4mP(v_xa,v_S,v_r),v_S,t_a)*.
% 0.18/0.40  28[1:Res:18.1,4.2] || c_in(v_sko__4mP(v_xa,u,v_r),v_S,t_a) c_in(v_xa,v_A,t_a) c_lessequals(u,v_A,tc_set(t_a)) -> c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Olub(u,v_cl,t_a),v_xa,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))*.
% 0.18/0.40  30[1:MRR:28.1,24.0] || c_in(v_sko__4mP(v_xa,u,v_r),v_S,t_a) c_lessequals(u,v_A,tc_set(t_a)) -> c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Olub(u,v_cl,t_a),v_xa,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))*.
% 0.18/0.40  31[2:Res:30.2,19.0] || c_in(v_sko__4mP(v_xa,v_S,v_r),v_S,t_a)* c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a)) -> .
% 0.18/0.40  32[2:MRR:31.0,31.1,27.0,7.0] ||  -> .
% 0.18/0.40  33[2:Spt:32.0,14.0,19.0] ||  -> c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),v_xa,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))*.
% 0.18/0.40  34[2:Spt:32.0,14.1] ||  -> c_in(v_xa,v_S,t_a)*.
% 0.18/0.40  35[2:MRR:16.1,33.0] || c_in(c_Pair(v_xa,c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))* -> .
% 0.18/0.40  36[2:Res:5.2,35.0] || c_in(v_xa,v_S,t_a) c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a))* -> .
% 0.18/0.40  37[2:MRR:36.0,36.1,34.0,7.0] ||  -> .
% 0.18/0.40  38[1:Spt:37.0,15.1] ||  -> c_in(v_xa,v_S,t_a)*.
% 0.18/0.40  39[2:Spt:17.0,17.2] || c_in(u,v_S,t_a) -> c_in(c_Pair(u,v_xa,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))*.
% 0.18/0.40  40[2:Res:39.1,4.2] || c_in(v_sko__4mP(v_xa,u,v_r),v_S,t_a) c_in(v_xa,v_A,t_a) c_lessequals(u,v_A,tc_set(t_a)) -> c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Olub(u,v_cl,t_a),v_xa,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))*.
% 0.18/0.40  41[2:MRR:40.1,24.0] || c_in(v_sko__4mP(v_xa,u,v_r),v_S,t_a) c_lessequals(u,v_A,tc_set(t_a)) -> c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Olub(u,v_cl,t_a),v_xa,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))*.
% 0.18/0.40  43[0:Res:25.2,16.1] || c_in(v_xa,v_A,t_a) c_in(c_Pair(v_xa,c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))* -> c_in(v_sko__4mP(v_xa,v_S,v_r),v_S,t_a).
% 0.18/0.40  44[2:Res:41.2,16.1] || c_in(v_sko__4mP(v_xa,v_S,v_r),v_S,t_a) c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a)) c_in(c_Pair(v_xa,c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))* -> .
% 0.18/0.40  45[0:MRR:43.0,24.0] || c_in(c_Pair(v_xa,c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))* -> c_in(v_sko__4mP(v_xa,v_S,v_r),v_S,t_a).
% 0.18/0.40  46[2:MRR:44.1,7.0] || c_in(v_sko__4mP(v_xa,v_S,v_r),v_S,t_a) c_in(c_Pair(v_xa,c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))* -> .
% 0.18/0.40  47[2:MRR:46.0,45.1] || c_in(c_Pair(v_xa,c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))* -> .
% 0.18/0.40  48[2:Res:5.2,47.0] || c_in(v_xa,v_S,t_a) c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a))* -> .
% 0.18/0.40  49[2:MRR:48.0,48.1,38.0,7.0] ||  -> .
% 0.18/0.40  50[2:Spt:49.0,17.1] || c_in(c_Pair(v_xa,c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))* -> .
% 0.18/0.40  51[2:Res:5.2,50.0] || c_in(v_xa,v_S,t_a) c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a))* -> .
% 0.18/0.40  52[2:MRR:51.0,51.1,38.0,7.0] ||  -> .
% 0.18/0.40  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.18/0.40  Formulae used in the proof : cls_Set_OsubsetD_0 cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0 cls_Tarski_O_91_124_AS1_A_60_61_AA_59_AL1_A_58_AA_59_AALL_Ax_58S1_O_A_Ix_M_AL1_J_A_58_Ar_A_124_93_A_61_61_62_A_Ilub_AS1_Acl_M_AL1_J_A_58_Ar_A_61_61_ATrue_0 cls_Tarski_O_91_124_AS1_A_60_61_AA_59_AL1_A_58_AA_59_AALL_Ax_58S1_O_A_Ix_M_AL1_J_A_58_Ar_A_124_93_A_61_61_62_A_Ilub_AS1_Acl_M_AL1_J_A_58_Ar_A_61_61_ATrue_1 cls_Tarski_O_91_124_AS1_A_60_61_AA_59_Ax1_A_58_AS1_A_124_93_A_61_61_62_A_Ix1_M_Alub_AS1_Acl_J_A_58_Ar_A_61_61_ATrue_0 cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0 cls_conjecture_0 cls_conjecture_10 cls_conjecture_3 cls_conjecture_4 cls_conjecture_6 cls_conjecture_9
% 0.18/0.40  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------