TSTP Solution File: LAT275-2 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : LAT275-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:57:58 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : LAT275-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Thu Aug 24 08:42:38 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.54  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.57  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.57  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.15/0.57  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.57  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.15/0.57  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.15/0.57  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.15/0.57  
% 0.15/0.57  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.15/0.57  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.15/0.57  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.57  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.57  % File     : LAT275-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.15/0.57  % Domain   : Analysis
% 0.15/0.57  % Problem  : Problem about Tarski's fixed point theorem
% 0.15/0.57  % Version  : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.15/0.57  % English  :
% 0.15/0.57  
% 0.15/0.57  % Refs     : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.15/0.57  % Source   : [Pau06]
% 0.15/0.57  % Names    :
% 0.15/0.57  
% 0.15/0.57  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.57  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.08 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.15/0.57  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    4 (   3 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
% 0.15/0.57  %            Number of literals    :    5 (   1 equ;   2 neg)
% 0.15/0.57  %            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.15/0.57  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.15/0.57  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.15/0.57  %            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
% 0.15/0.57  %            Number of variables   :    1 (   0 sgn)
% 0.15/0.57  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN
% 0.15/0.57  
% 0.15/0.57  % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.15/0.57  %            of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.15/0.57  %            The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.15/0.57  %            can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.15/0.57  %            axioms.
% 0.15/0.57  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.57  cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
% 0.15/0.57      c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a)) ).
% 0.15/0.57  
% 0.15/0.57  cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.15/0.57      ~ c_in(c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),t_a) ).
% 0.15/0.57  
% 0.15/0.57  cnf(cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0,axiom,
% 0.15/0.57      v_A = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) ).
% 0.15/0.57  
% 0.15/0.57  cnf(cls_Tarski_OS_A_60_61_AA_A_61_61_62_Alub_AS_Acl_A_58_AA_0,axiom,
% 0.15/0.57      ( ~ c_lessequals(V_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a))
% 0.15/0.57      | c_in(c_Tarski_Olub(V_S,v_cl,t_a),v_A,t_a) ) ).
% 0.15/0.57  
% 0.15/0.57  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.57  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.57  % Proof found
% 0.15/0.57  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.57  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.15/0.57  %ClaNum:20(EqnAxiom:16)
% 0.15/0.57  %VarNum:2(SingletonVarNum:1)
% 0.15/0.57  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.15/0.57  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.15/0.57  %SharedTerms:11
% 0.15/0.57  %goalClause: 18 19
% 0.15/0.57  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.15/0.58  [17]E(f3(a1,a2,a5),a6)
% 0.15/0.58  [18]P1(a8,a6,f7(a2))
% 0.15/0.58  [19]~P2(f4(a8,a1,a2),f3(a1,a2,a5),a2)
% 0.15/0.58  [20]~P1(x201,a6,f7(a2))+P2(f4(x201,a1,a2),a6,a2)
% 0.15/0.58  %EqnAxiom
% 0.15/0.58  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.15/0.58  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.15/0.58  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.15/0.58  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f3(x41,x43,x44),f3(x42,x43,x44))
% 0.15/0.58  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f3(x53,x51,x54),f3(x53,x52,x54))
% 0.15/0.58  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f3(x63,x64,x61),f3(x63,x64,x62))
% 0.15/0.58  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f7(x71),f7(x72))
% 0.15/0.58  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f4(x81,x83,x84),f4(x82,x83,x84))
% 0.15/0.58  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f4(x93,x91,x94),f4(x93,x92,x94))
% 0.15/0.58  [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f4(x103,x104,x101),f4(x103,x104,x102))
% 0.15/0.58  [11]P1(x112,x113,x114)+~E(x111,x112)+~P1(x111,x113,x114)
% 0.15/0.58  [12]P1(x123,x122,x124)+~E(x121,x122)+~P1(x123,x121,x124)
% 0.15/0.58  [13]P1(x133,x134,x132)+~E(x131,x132)+~P1(x133,x134,x131)
% 0.15/0.58  [14]P2(x142,x143,x144)+~E(x141,x142)+~P2(x141,x143,x144)
% 0.15/0.58  [15]P2(x153,x152,x154)+~E(x151,x152)+~P2(x153,x151,x154)
% 0.15/0.58  [16]P2(x163,x164,x162)+~E(x161,x162)+~P2(x163,x164,x161)
% 0.15/0.58  
% 0.15/0.58  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.58  cnf(21,plain,
% 0.15/0.58     (E(a6,f3(a1,a2,a5))),
% 0.15/0.58     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,2])).
% 0.15/0.58  cnf(23,plain,
% 0.15/0.58     (P2(f4(a8,a1,a2),a6,a2)),
% 0.15/0.58     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,17,2,12,20])).
% 0.15/0.58  cnf(38,plain,
% 0.15/0.58     ($false),
% 0.15/0.58     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,23,21,15]),
% 0.15/0.58     ['proof']).
% 0.15/0.58  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.15/0.58  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------