TSTP Solution File: LAT273-1 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : LAT273-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:17:15 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 14.29s 2.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 14.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 5 unt; 3 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 43 ( 8 equ; 26 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 8 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 1 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_b,v_A,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,v_a,v_b,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
c_Tarski_OisLub(v_S,v_cl,v_L,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Pair(v_L,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(c_2797,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,c_Tarski_Ointerval(X1,X2,X3,X4),tc_set(X4))
| ~ c_in(X5,X0,X4)
| c_in(c_Pair(X5,X3,X4,X4),X1,tc_prod(X4,X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT006-2.ax',cls_Tarski_O_91_124_AS1_A_60_61_Ainterval_Ar_Aa1_Ab1_59_Ax1_A_58_AS1_A_124_93_A_61_61_62_A_Ix1_M_Ab1_J_A_58_Ar_A_61_61_ATrue_0) ).
cnf(c_2801,plain,
( ~ c_Tarski_OisLub(X0,v_cl,X1,t_a)
| ~ c_in(X2,v_A,t_a)
| c_in(c_Pair(X1,X2,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
| c_in(v_sko__4mi(X0,v_r,X2),X0,t_a) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT006-2.ax',cls_Tarski_O_91_124_AisLub_AS1_Acl_AL1_59_Az1_A_58_AA_59_AALL_Ay_58S1_O_A_Iy_M_Az1_J_A_58_Ar_A_124_93_A_61_61_62_A_IL1_M_Az1_J_A_58_Ar_A_61_61_ATrue_0) ).
cnf(c_2802,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_sko__4mi(X0,v_r,X1),X1,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
| ~ c_Tarski_OisLub(X0,v_cl,X2,t_a)
| ~ c_in(X1,v_A,t_a)
| c_in(c_Pair(X2,X1,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT006-2.ax',cls_Tarski_O_91_124_AisLub_AS1_Acl_AL1_59_Az1_A_58_AA_59_AALL_Ay_58S1_O_A_Iy_M_Az1_J_A_58_Ar_A_124_93_A_61_61_62_A_IL1_M_Az1_J_A_58_Ar_A_61_61_ATrue_1) ).
cnf(c_34797,plain,
( X0 != v_S
| X1 != v_L
| t_a != t_a
| v_cl != v_cl
| ~ c_in(X2,v_A,t_a)
| c_in(c_Pair(X1,X2,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
| c_in(v_sko__4mi(X0,v_r,X2),X0,t_a) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_2801]) ).
cnf(c_34798,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,v_A,t_a)
| c_in(c_Pair(v_L,X0,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
| c_in(v_sko__4mi(v_S,v_r,X0),v_S,t_a) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_34797]) ).
cnf(c_34818,plain,
( X0 != v_S
| X1 != v_L
| t_a != t_a
| v_cl != v_cl
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_sko__4mi(X0,v_r,X2),X2,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
| ~ c_in(X2,v_A,t_a)
| c_in(c_Pair(X1,X2,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_2802]) ).
cnf(c_34819,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_sko__4mi(v_S,v_r,X0),X0,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
| ~ c_in(X0,v_A,t_a)
| c_in(c_Pair(v_L,X0,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_34818]) ).
cnf(c_71265,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_b,v_A,t_a)
| c_in(v_sko__4mi(v_S,v_r,v_b),v_S,t_a) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_34798,c_55]) ).
cnf(c_71285,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,v_S,t_a)
| c_in(c_Pair(X0,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_2797]) ).
cnf(c_71411,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_sko__4mi(v_S,v_r,v_b),v_S,t_a)
| ~ c_in(v_b,v_A,t_a)
| c_in(c_Pair(v_L,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_71285,c_34819]) ).
cnf(c_71412,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_71411,c_71265,c_55,c_50]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : LAT273-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 05:02:39 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 14.29/2.69 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 14.29/2.69 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69 ------ iProver source info
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 14.29/2.69 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 14.29/2.69 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 14.29/2.69 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69 ------ Parsing...successful
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 107 sf_s rm: 605 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe:32:0s pe_e
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e
% 14.29/2.69 ------ Proving...
% 14.29/2.69 ------ Problem Properties
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69 clauses 1558
% 14.29/2.69 conjectures 6
% 14.29/2.69 EPR 63
% 14.29/2.69 Horn 1352
% 14.29/2.69 unary 638
% 14.29/2.69 binary 622
% 14.29/2.69 lits 2841
% 14.29/2.69 lits eq 1151
% 14.29/2.69 fd_pure 0
% 14.29/2.69 fd_pseudo 0
% 14.29/2.69 fd_cond 122
% 14.29/2.69 fd_pseudo_cond 71
% 14.29/2.69 AC symbols 0
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69 ------
% 14.29/2.69 Current options:
% 14.29/2.69 ------
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69 ------ Proving...
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 14.29/2.69
% 14.29/2.69
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------