TSTP Solution File: LAT272-2 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : LAT272-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:26:41 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.43s 0.76s
% Output : Refutation 0.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08 % Problem : LAT272-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.08/0.27 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.27 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.27 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.27 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.27 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.27 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.27 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.08/0.27 % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 06:17:58 EDT 2022
% 0.08/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.43/0.76 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.43/0.76 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.43/0.76 Process 26240 was started by sandbox2 on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.43/0.76 Wed Jun 29 06:17:58 2022
% 0.43/0.76 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_25971_n032.cluster.edu".
% 0.43/0.76 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_25971_n032.cluster.edu
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.43/0.76 set(auto2).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.43/0.76 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.43/0.76 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.43/0.76 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.43/0.76 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.43/0.76 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.43/0.76 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.43/0.76 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.43/0.76 clear(print_given).
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (4 formulas)
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.43/0.76 1 -c_Tarski_OisLub(A,v_cl,B,t_a) | -c_in(C,A,t_a) | c_in(c_Pair(C,B,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) # label(cls_Tarski_O_91_124_AisLub_AS1_Acl_AL1_59_Ay1_A_58_AS1_A_124_93_A_61_61_62_A_Iy1_M_AL1_J_A_58_Ar_A_61_61_ATrue_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.76 2 c_Tarski_OisLub(v_S,v_cl,v_L,t_a) # label(cls_conjecture_4) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.76 Derived: -c_in(A,v_S,t_a) | c_in(c_Pair(A,v_L,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)). [resolve(1,a,2,a)].
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 Auto_denials:
% 0.43/0.76 % copying label cls_conjecture_7 to answer in negative clause
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.43/0.76 Function symbol KB weights: t_a=1. v_S=1. v_L=1. v_r=1. v_x=1. tc_prod=1. c_Pair=1.
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.43/0.76 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.43/0.76 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds: cls_conjecture_7.
% 0.43/0.76 % Length of proof is 7.
% 0.43/0.76 % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.43/0.76 % Maximum clause weight is 14.000.
% 0.43/0.76 % Given clauses 3.
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 1 -c_Tarski_OisLub(A,v_cl,B,t_a) | -c_in(C,A,t_a) | c_in(c_Pair(C,B,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) # label(cls_Tarski_O_91_124_AisLub_AS1_Acl_AL1_59_Ay1_A_58_AS1_A_124_93_A_61_61_62_A_Iy1_M_AL1_J_A_58_Ar_A_61_61_ATrue_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.76 2 c_Tarski_OisLub(v_S,v_cl,v_L,t_a) # label(cls_conjecture_4) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.76 3 c_in(v_x,v_S,t_a) # label(cls_conjecture_6) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.76 4 -c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_L,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) # label(cls_conjecture_7) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(cls_conjecture_7). [assumption].
% 0.43/0.76 5 -c_in(A,v_S,t_a) | c_in(c_Pair(A,v_L,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)). [resolve(1,a,2,a)].
% 0.43/0.76 6 -c_in(v_x,v_S,t_a) # answer(cls_conjecture_7). [resolve(5,b,4,a)].
% 0.43/0.76 7 $F # answer(cls_conjecture_7). [resolve(6,a,3,a)].
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.43/0.76 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 Given=3. Generated=4. Kept=4. proofs=1.
% 0.43/0.76 Usable=3. Sos=0. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=5. Hints=0.
% 0.43/0.76 Megabytes=0.03.
% 0.43/0.76 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.43/0.76 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.43/0.76
% 0.43/0.76 Process 26240 exit (max_proofs) Wed Jun 29 06:17:58 2022
% 0.43/0.76 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------