TSTP Solution File: LAT272-2 by Moca---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Moca---0.1
% Problem : LAT272-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : moca.sh %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:05:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.39s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : LAT272-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : moca.sh %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 06:19:38 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.39 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.39 The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 c_Tarski_OisLub(v_S, v_cl, v_L, t_a)
% 0.19/0.39 c_in(v_x, v_S, t_a)
% 0.19/0.39 c_in(c_Pair(v_x, v_L, t_a, t_a), v_r, tc_prod(t_a, t_a)) ==> \bottom
% 0.19/0.39 c_Tarski_OisLub(V_S, v_cl, V_L, t_a) & c_in(V_y, V_S, t_a) ==> c_in(c_Pair(V_y, V_L, t_a, t_a), v_r, tc_prod(t_a, t_a))
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 This holds because
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 E:
% 0.19/0.39 c_Tarski_OisLub(v_S, v_cl, v_L, t_a) = true__
% 0.19/0.39 c_in(v_x, v_S, t_a) = true__
% 0.19/0.39 f1(c_in(c_Pair(v_x, v_L, t_a, t_a), v_r, tc_prod(t_a, t_a))) = true__
% 0.19/0.39 f1(true__) = false__
% 0.19/0.39 f2(true__, V_y, V_L) = c_in(c_Pair(V_y, V_L, t_a, t_a), v_r, tc_prod(t_a, t_a))
% 0.19/0.39 f3(c_in(V_y, V_S, t_a), V_S, V_L, V_y) = true__
% 0.19/0.39 f3(true__, V_S, V_L, V_y) = f2(c_Tarski_OisLub(V_S, v_cl, V_L, t_a), V_y, V_L)
% 0.19/0.39 G:
% 0.19/0.39 true__ = false__
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 This holds because
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 c_Tarski_OisLub(v_S, v_cl, v_L, t_a) -> true__
% 0.19/0.39 c_in(c_Pair(V_y, V_L, t_a, t_a), v_r, tc_prod(t_a, t_a)) -> f2(true__, V_y, V_L)
% 0.19/0.39 c_in(v_x, v_S, t_a) -> true__
% 0.19/0.39 f1(c_in(c_Pair(v_x, v_L, t_a, t_a), v_r, tc_prod(t_a, t_a))) -> true__
% 0.19/0.39 f1(f2(true__, v_x, v_L)) -> true__
% 0.19/0.39 f1(true__) -> false__
% 0.19/0.39 f2(c_Tarski_OisLub(V_S, v_cl, V_L, t_a), V_y, V_L) -> f3(true__, V_S, V_L, V_y)
% 0.19/0.39 f2(true__, Y2, v_L) -> f3(true__, v_S, v_L, Y2)
% 0.19/0.39 f3(c_in(V_y, V_S, t_a), V_S, V_L, V_y) -> true__
% 0.19/0.39 f3(true__, v_S, Y2, v_x) -> true__
% 0.19/0.39 false__ -> true__
% 0.19/0.39 with the LPO induced by
% 0.19/0.39 c_in > f2 > v_r > c_Pair > f3 > t_a > v_cl > tc_prod > f1 > v_x > v_L > v_S > c_Tarski_OisLub > false__ > true__
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.39
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------