TSTP Solution File: LAT271-2 by Leo-III---1.7.7

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem  : LAT271-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:27:14 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.26s 1.52s
% Output   : Refutation 2.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   7 unt;  12 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   13 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   90 (   6   ~;   4   |;   0   &;  80   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   8 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   17 (  17   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  12 usr;   7 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0   ^;  12   !;   0   ?;  12   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(c_lessequals_type,type,
    c_lessequals: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(v_S_type,type,
    v_S: $i ).

thf(c_Tarski_Ointerval_type,type,
    c_Tarski_Ointerval: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(v_r_type,type,
    v_r: $i ).

thf(v_a_type,type,
    v_a: $i ).

thf(v_b_type,type,
    v_b: $i ).

thf(t_a_type,type,
    t_a: $i ).

thf(tc_set_type,type,
    tc_set: $i > $i ).

thf(c_in_type,type,
    c_in: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(v_x_type,type,
    v_x: $i ).

thf(c_Pair_type,type,
    c_Pair: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(tc_prod_type,type,
    tc_prod: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals @ v_S @ ( c_Tarski_Ointerval @ v_r @ v_a @ v_b @ t_a ) @ ( tc_set @ t_a ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

thf(5,plain,
    c_lessequals @ v_S @ ( c_Tarski_Ointerval @ v_r @ v_a @ v_b @ t_a ) @ ( tc_set @ t_a ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    c_in @ v_x @ v_S @ t_a,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

thf(6,plain,
    c_in @ v_x @ v_S @ t_a,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( c_in @ ( c_Pair @ v_a @ v_x @ t_a @ t_a ) @ v_r @ ( tc_prod @ t_a @ t_a ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ~ ( c_in @ ( c_Pair @ v_a @ v_x @ t_a @ t_a ) @ v_r @ ( tc_prod @ t_a @ t_a ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( c_in @ A @ B @ C )
      | ~ ( c_lessequals @ B @ ( c_Tarski_Ointerval @ D @ E @ F @ C ) @ ( tc_set @ C ) )
      | ( c_in @ ( c_Pair @ E @ A @ C @ C ) @ D @ ( tc_prod @ C @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_O_91_124_AS1_A_60_61_Ainterval_Ar_Aa1_Ab1_59_Ax1_A_58_AS1_A_124_93_A_61_61_62_A_Ia1_M_Ax1_J_A_58_Ar_A_61_61_ATrue_0) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( c_in @ A @ B @ C )
      | ~ ( c_lessequals @ B @ ( c_Tarski_Ointerval @ D @ E @ F @ C ) @ ( tc_set @ C ) )
      | ( c_in @ ( c_Pair @ E @ A @ C @ C ) @ D @ ( tc_prod @ C @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[5,6,7,9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : LAT271-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % DateTime : Thu May 18 14:37:51 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.84/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.12/0.91  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (110ms). 
% 1.12/0.92  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.39/1.14  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.39/1.14  % [INFO] 	 cvc4 registered as external prover. 
% 1.39/1.15  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.65/1.21  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 1 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.74/1.23  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 1 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.74/1.23  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 1.74/1.23  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.74/1.24  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 2.26/1.52  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 2.26/1.52  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 2.26/1.52  % Time passed: 1021ms (effective reasoning time: 593ms)
% 2.26/1.52  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 2.26/1.52  % Axioms used in derivation (1): cls_Tarski_O_91_124_AS1_A_60_61_Ainterval_Ar_Aa1_Ab1_59_Ax1_A_58_AS1_A_124_93_A_61_61_62_A_Ia1_M_Ax1_J_A_58_Ar_A_61_61_ATrue_0
% 2.26/1.52  % No. of inferences in proof: 9
% 2.26/1.52  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1021 ms resp. 593 ms w/o parsing
% 2.50/1.54  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.50/1.55  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------