TSTP Solution File: LAT270-2 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : LAT270-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 07:22:48 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.58s 0.80s
% Output : Refutation 0.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 9 ~; 6 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 3 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f9,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f8,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
c_in(v_b,v_A,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Aa8J9kOler/Vampire---4.8_9051',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f8,plain,
~ c_in(v_b,v_A,t_a),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f7,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
c_in(v_a,v_A,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Aa8J9kOler/Vampire---4.8_9051',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f7,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_a,v_A,t_a)
| ~ c_in(v_b,v_A,t_a) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f6,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
~ c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Aa8J9kOler/Vampire---4.8_9051',cls_conjecture_6) ).
fof(f6,plain,
( c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a))
| ~ c_in(v_a,v_A,t_a)
| ~ c_in(v_b,v_A,t_a) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f3,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,X1,X0,t_a),tc_set(t_a))
| c_lessequals(X2,v_A,tc_set(t_a))
| ~ c_in(X1,v_A,t_a)
| ~ c_in(X0,v_A,t_a) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Aa8J9kOler/Vampire---4.8_9051',cls_Tarski_O_91_124_Aa1_A_58_AA_59_Ab1_A_58_AA_59_AS1_A_60_61_Ainterval_Ar_Aa1_Ab1_A_124_93_A_61_61_62_AS1_A_60_61_AA_A_61_61_ATrue_0) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,v_a,v_b,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Aa8J9kOler/Vampire---4.8_9051',cls_conjecture_2) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : LAT270-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.33 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.33 % DateTime : Fri May 3 12:16:50 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.33 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN problem
% 0.10/0.33 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Aa8J9kOler/Vampire---4.8_9051
% 0.58/0.79 % (9163)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.58/0.79 % (9161)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.58/0.79 % (9166)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.58/0.79 % (9164)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.58/0.79 % (9165)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.58/0.79 % (9162)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.58/0.79 % (9167)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.58/0.79 % (9168)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.58/0.79 % (9161)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.58/0.79 % (9163)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.58/0.79 % (9164)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.58/0.79 % (9165)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.58/0.79 % (9167)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.58/0.79 % (9166)First to succeed.
% 0.58/0.79 % (9162)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.58/0.79 % (9166)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-9159"
% 0.58/0.79 % (9168)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.58/0.80 % (9166)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.58/0.80 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for Vampire---4
% 0.58/0.80 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.58/0.80 % (9166)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.80 % (9166)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.58/0.80 % (9166)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.58/0.80
% 0.58/0.80 % (9166)Memory used [KB]: 957
% 0.58/0.80 % (9166)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.58/0.80 % (9166)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.58/0.80 % (9159)Success in time 0.458 s
% 0.58/0.80 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------