TSTP Solution File: LAT268-2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : LAT268-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:46:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.56s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12  % Problem  : LAT268-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 00:16:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n009.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36  Wed Jun 29 00:16:37 2022
% 0.13/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 6892.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.36  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.13/0.36  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 19 during input processing: 0 [copy,19,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.56  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.56  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.56  number of clauses in intial UL: 3
% 0.21/0.56  number of clauses initially in problem: 16
% 0.21/0.56  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 18
% 0.21/0.56  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 90
% 0.21/0.56  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 93
% 0.21/0.56  absolute distinct symbol count: 21
% 0.21/0.56     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.21/0.56     distinct function count: 9
% 0.21/0.56     distinct constant count: 9
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.21/0.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.56  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.17 sec ----> 27 [binary,26.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  Length of proof is 8.  Level of proof is 5.
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.21/0.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.56  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  1 [] {+} -c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Oglb(v_S,v_cl,t_a),v_x,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)).
% 0.21/0.56  2 [] {+} -c_in(A,B,C)| -c_in(D,c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(C,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))| -c_in(D,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(C,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))| -c_lessequals(B,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(D,C,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(C))|c_in(c_Pair(A,c_Tarski_Olub(B,D,C),C,C),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(D,C,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(C,C)).
% 0.21/0.56  3 [] {+} -c_in(c_Pair(A,B,C,C),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(c_Tarski_Odual(D,C),C,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(C,C))|c_in(c_Pair(B,A,C,C),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(D,C,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(C,C)).
% 0.21/0.56  4 [] {-} c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a)).
% 0.21/0.56  5 [] {-} c_in(v_x,v_S,t_a).
% 0.21/0.56  6 [] {-} v_A=c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit).
% 0.21/0.56  7 [copy,6,flip.1] {-} c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)=v_A.
% 0.21/0.56  9 [] {-} c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)).
% 0.21/0.56  10 [] {-} c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)).
% 0.21/0.56  11 [] {-} c_Tarski_Oglb(A,B,C)=c_Tarski_Olub(A,c_Tarski_Odual(B,C),C).
% 0.21/0.56  12 [copy,11,flip.1] {-} c_Tarski_Olub(A,c_Tarski_Odual(B,C),C)=c_Tarski_Oglb(A,B,C).
% 0.21/0.56  15,14 [] {-} c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(A,B),B,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)=c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(A,B,tc_Product__Type_Ounit).
% 0.21/0.56  16 [] {-} v_r=c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit).
% 0.21/0.56  17 [copy,16,flip.1] {-} c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)=v_r.
% 0.21/0.56  21 [para_from,17.1.1,3.2.2] {-} -c_in(c_Pair(A,B,t_a,t_a),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(t_a,t_a))|c_in(c_Pair(B,A,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)).
% 0.21/0.56  22 [para_from,12.1.1,2.5.1.2,demod,15] {-} -c_in(A,B,C)| -c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(D,C),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(C,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))| -c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(D,C),c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(C,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))| -c_lessequals(B,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(D,C,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(C))|c_in(c_Pair(A,c_Tarski_Oglb(B,D,C),C,C),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(c_Tarski_Odual(D,C),C,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(C,C)).
% 0.21/0.56  24 [para_into,22.4.2,7.1.1] {-} -c_in(A,B,t_a)| -c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))| -c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))| -c_lessequals(B,v_A,tc_set(t_a))|c_in(c_Pair(A,c_Tarski_Oglb(B,v_cl,t_a),t_a,t_a),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)).
% 0.21/0.56  25 [hyper,24,5,9,10,4] {-} c_in(c_Pair(v_x,c_Tarski_Oglb(v_S,v_cl,t_a),t_a,t_a),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)).
% 0.21/0.56  26 [hyper,25,21] {-} c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Oglb(v_S,v_cl,t_a),v_x,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)).
% 0.21/0.56  27 [binary,26.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.56  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  ============ end of search ============
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  Process 6892 finished Wed Jun 29 00:16:37 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------