TSTP Solution File: LAT268-2 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : LAT268-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:43:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.50s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   26 (   4 equ;  12 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;   9 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_x,v_S,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Oglb(v_S,v_cl,t_a),v_x,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0,axiom,
    v_A = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_OCL_Olub__upper_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ c_in(U,c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(Z,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | ~ c_in(U,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(Z,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | ~ c_lessequals(Y,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(U,Z,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(Z))
    | c_in(c_Pair(X,c_Tarski_Olub(Y,U,Z),Z,Z),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(U,Z,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(Z,Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OCL_Olub__upper_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_O_Ix1_M_Ay1_J_A_58_Aorder_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_A_Iy1_M_Ax1_J_A_58_Aorder_Acl_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(X,Y,Z,Z),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(c_Tarski_Odual(U,Z),Z,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(Z,Z))
    | c_in(c_Pair(Y,X,Z,Z),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(U,Z,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(Z,Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_O_Ix1_M_Ay1_J_A_58_Aorder_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_A_Iy1_M_Ax1_J_A_58_Aorder_Acl_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_ACompleteLattice_0,axiom,
    c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_ACompleteLattice_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_APartialOrder_0,axiom,
    c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_APartialOrder_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Oglb__dual__lub_0,axiom,
    c_Tarski_Oglb(X,Y,Z) = c_Tarski_Olub(X,c_Tarski_Odual(Y,Z),Z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Oglb__dual__lub_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Opset_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0,axiom,
    c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(X,Y),Y,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X,Y,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Opset_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0,axiom,
    v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0) ).

cnf(13,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(U,Z),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(Z,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | ~ c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(U,Z),c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(Z,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | ~ c_lessequals(Y,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(U,Z,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(Z))
    | c_in(c_Pair(X,c_Tarski_Oglb(Y,U,Z),Z,Z),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(c_Tarski_Odual(U,Z),Z,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(Z,Z)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[cls_Tarski_OCL_Olub__upper_0,cls_Tarski_Opset_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0,theory(equality)]),cls_Tarski_Oglb__dual__lub_0,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(14,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X,Y,t_a)
    | ~ c_lessequals(Y,v_A,tc_set(t_a))
    | c_in(c_Pair(X,c_Tarski_Oglb(Y,v_cl,t_a),t_a,t_a),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[13,cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0,theory(equality)]),cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_APartialOrder_0,cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_ACompleteLattice_0]) ).

cnf(16,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_x,c_Tarski_Oglb(v_S,v_cl,t_a),t_a,t_a),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[14,cls_conjecture_1,cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(17,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Tarski_O_Ix1_M_Ay1_J_A_58_Aorder_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_A_Iy1_M_Ax1_J_A_58_Aorder_Acl_0,16]),cls_conjecture_2,cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : LAT268-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 00:22:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-29T00:22:24
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n019.cluster.edu at 2022-06-29T00:22:24
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  #||
% 0.19/0.50  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.50  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.50  ||#
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.19/0.50  ;        23 formulas have been input or derived (from 16 formulas).
% 0.19/0.50  ;        17 (74%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.19/0.50  ;           17 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.19/0.50  ; 
% 0.19/0.50  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.19/0.50  ;     0.003   9%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.19/0.50  ;     0.001   3%   Assert                       (11 calls)
% 0.19/0.50  ;     0.003   9%   Process new row              (21 calls)
% 0.19/0.50  ;     0.000   0%   Resolution                   (30 calls)
% 0.19/0.50  ;     0.000   0%   Paramodulation               (15 calls)
% 0.19/0.50  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (6 calls)
% 0.19/0.50  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (6 calls)
% 0.19/0.50  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (6 calls)
% 0.19/0.50  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (1 call)
% 0.19/0.50  ;     0.002   6%   Forward simplification       (21 calls)
% 0.19/0.50  ;     0.001   3%   Backward simplification      (17 calls)
% 0.19/0.50  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (25 calls)
% 0.19/0.50  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.19/0.50  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.19/0.50  ;     0.023  70%   Other
% 0.19/0.50  ;     0.033        Total
% 0.19/0.50  ;     0.036        Real time
% 0.19/0.50  ; 
% 0.19/0.50  ; Term-hash-array has 66 terms in all.
% 0.19/0.50  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 6 entries (6 at peak, 6 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.19/0.50  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 99 nodes (99 at peak, 99 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.19/0.50  ;  Retrieved 3 possibly forward subsuming rows in 6 calls.
% 0.19/0.50  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 6 calls.
% 0.19/0.50  ; Path-index has 75 entries (75 at peak, 75 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.19/0.50  ; Path-index has 308 nodes (308 at peak, 308 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.19/0.50  ; Trie-index has 75 entries (75 at peak, 75 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.19/0.50  ; Trie-index has 351 nodes (351 at peak, 351 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.19/0.50  ; Retrieved 6 generalization terms in 46 calls.
% 0.19/0.50  ; Retrieved 10 instance terms in 10 calls.
% 0.19/0.50  ; Retrieved 97 unifiable terms in 175 calls.
% 0.19/0.50  ; 
% 0.19/0.50  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1 entry:
% 0.19/0.50  ;     1 with value (4 69)
% 0.19/0.50  Evaluation took:
% 0.19/0.50    0.036 seconds of real time
% 0.19/0.50    0.027909 seconds of user run time
% 0.19/0.50    0.007786 seconds of system run time
% 0.19/0.50    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.19/0.50    0 page faults and
% 0.19/0.50    2,993,176 bytes consed.
% 0.19/0.50  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.50  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-29T00:22:24
% 0.19/0.50  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.50  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------