TSTP Solution File: LAT267-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : LAT267-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:24:09 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_x,v_S,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_x,v_S,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_x,v_S,t_a),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_x,v_S,t_a),
c_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_x,v_S,t_a),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LAT267-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 20:55:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.54 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # new_bool_1 with pid 7376 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.20/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.54 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 100s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 7379 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.54 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 100s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.54 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.54 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.54 # Parsed axioms : 2752
% 0.20/0.54 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2680
% 0.20/0.54 # Initial clauses : 72
% 0.20/0.54 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Initial clauses in saturation : 72
% 0.20/0.54 # Processed clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.54 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # ...remaining for further processing : 1
% 0.20/0.54 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.20/0.54 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 70
% 0.20/0.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 114
% 0.20/0.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 23909
% 0.20/0.54 # Search garbage collected termcells : 7945
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.20/0.54 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.54 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.20/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 4172 pages
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54 # User time : 0.062 s
% 0.20/0.54 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.20/0.54 # Total time : 0.073 s
% 0.20/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 3468 pages
% 0.20/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.55 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------