TSTP Solution File: LAT266-2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : LAT266-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:46:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.35s
% Output   : Refutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : LAT266-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 05:58:51 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.12/0.35  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.35  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Thu Jun 30 05:58:51 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 2932.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 0.12/0.35  strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 11 [binary,10.1,9.1] {-} $F.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 2.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.12/0.35  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.35  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  1 [] {-} -c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(t_a)).
% 0.12/0.35  2 [] {-} c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(t_a)).
% 0.12/0.35  3 [] {-} v_A=c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit).
% 0.12/0.35  5,4 [copy,3,flip.1] {-} c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)=v_A.
% 0.12/0.35  7,6 [] {-} c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(A,B),B,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)=c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(A,B,tc_Product__Type_Ounit).
% 0.12/0.35  9 [back_demod,2,demod,5] {-} c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a)).
% 0.12/0.35  10 [back_demod,1,demod,7,5] {-} -c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a)).
% 0.12/0.35  11 [binary,10.1,9.1] {-} $F.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.12/0.35  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ============ end of search ============
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  Process 2932 finished Thu Jun 30 05:58:51 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------