TSTP Solution File: LAT264-2 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : LAT264-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:36:30 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.52s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 1
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 3 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 3 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 1 ( 1 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f2,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
~ c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_APartialOrder_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : LAT264-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 00:54:55 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.51 % (21533)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/498Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (21525)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/68Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (21533)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.51 % (21525)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.20/0.51 % (21517)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.52 % (21533)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.52 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52 % (21533)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (21533)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.52 % (21533)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.52 % (21533)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 % (21533)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.20/0.52 % (21533)Time elapsed: 0.057 s
% 0.20/0.52 % (21533)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (21533)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (21509)Success in time 0.165 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------