TSTP Solution File: LAT263-2 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : LAT263-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:00:18 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   23
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  16 unt;  15 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   23 (  13   ~;  10   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   20 (   8   >;  12   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0 sgn;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    v_S: $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    v_A: $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    t_a: $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    tc_set: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    c_lessequals: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    v_cl: $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    c_Tarski_Oglb: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    c_in: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    tc_Product__Type_Ounit: $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice: $i ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    c_Tarski_OPartialOrder: $i ).

tff(decl_35,type,
    c_Tarski_Olub: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_36,type,
    c_Tarski_Odual: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_OCL_Olub__in__lattice_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Tarski_Olub(X3,X1,X2),c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X2)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X3,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OCL_Olub__in__lattice_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Opset_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0,axiom,
    c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(X1,X2),X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Opset_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Tarski_Oglb(v_S,v_cl,t_a),v_A,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Oglb__dual__lub_0,axiom,
    c_Tarski_Oglb(X1,X2,X3) = c_Tarski_Olub(X1,c_Tarski_Odual(X2,X3),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Oglb__dual__lub_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0,axiom,
    v_A = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_ACompleteLattice_0,axiom,
    c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_ACompleteLattice_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_APartialOrder_0,axiom,
    c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_APartialOrder_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Tarski_Olub(X3,X1,X2),c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X2)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X3,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(X2)) ),
    cls_Tarski_OCL_Olub__in__lattice_0 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(X1,X2),X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    cls_Tarski_Opset_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Tarski_Oglb(v_S,v_cl,t_a),v_A,t_a),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    c_Tarski_Oglb(X1,X2,X3) = c_Tarski_Olub(X1,c_Tarski_Odual(X2,X3),X3),
    cls_Tarski_Oglb__dual__lub_0 ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Tarski_Olub(X1,c_Tarski_Odual(X2,X3),X3),c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X2,X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X3)
    | ~ c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(X2,X3),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | ~ c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(X2,X3),c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X2,X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    v_A = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_ACompleteLattice_0 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_APartialOrder_0 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Tarski_Olub(v_S,c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),t_a),v_A,t_a),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Tarski_Olub(X1,c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),t_a),v_A,t_a)
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,v_A,tc_set(t_a)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a)),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : LAT263-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Thu Aug 24 05:44:37 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.56  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.57  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.17/0.57  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.57  % Proof found
% 0.17/0.57  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.57  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.58  % Total time : 0.004000 s
% 0.17/0.58  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.17/0.58  % Total time : 0.006000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------