TSTP Solution File: LAT261-2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : LAT261-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 13:21:06 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.39s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 1
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 3 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 3 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 1 ( 1 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f2,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
~ c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_ACompleteLattice_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14 % Problem : LAT261-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.16 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Apr 29 21:33:47 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.37 % (11517)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.39 % (11523)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 % (11524)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 % (11521)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.39 % (11523)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.39 TRYING [1]
% 0.15/0.39 Detected maximum model sizes of [1,1,max,1,1]
% 0.15/0.39 TRYING [1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.39 % (11520)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 Cannot enumerate next child to try in an incomplete setup
% 0.15/0.39 % (11521)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (11521)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (11521)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.15/0.39 % (11521)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 % (11521)Memory used [KB]: 722
% 0.15/0.39 % (11521)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.39 % (11521)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.39 % (11524)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.39 % (11521)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (11521)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (11522)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 % (11519)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.39 Detected maximum model sizes of [1,1,max,1,1]
% 0.15/0.39 TRYING [1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.39 % (11520)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.39 Cannot enumerate next child to try in an incomplete setup
% 0.15/0.39 % (11519)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (11519)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (11519)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.15/0.39 % (11519)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.39 % (11523)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.39 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.39 % (11523)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (11523)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.15/0.39 % (11523)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 % (11523)Memory used [KB]: 724
% 0.15/0.39 % (11523)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.39 % (11523)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.39 % (11523)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (11523)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 % (11517)Success in time 0.016 s
% 0.15/0.40 % Exception at proof search level
% 0.15/0.40 System fail: Cannot decrease semaphore. error 22: Invalid argument
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------