TSTP Solution File: LAT259-2 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : LAT259-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:17:08 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.69s 1.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 17 ( 4 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_b,v_a,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
v_a != v_b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,X2,X2),X3,tc_prod(X2,X2))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X1,X0,X2,X2),X3,tc_prod(X2,X2))
| ~ c_Relation_Oantisym(X3,X2)
| X0 = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Relation_Oantisym__def_0) ).
cnf(c_53,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X1,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
| c_Relation_Oantisym(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X0,X1,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_1) ).
cnf(c_54,plain,
c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0) ).
cnf(c_55,plain,
c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = v_r,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0) ).
cnf(c_289,plain,
c_Relation_Oantisym(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),t_a),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_53]) ).
cnf(c_290,plain,
c_Relation_Oantisym(v_r,t_a),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_289,c_55]) ).
cnf(c_300,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
| ~ c_Relation_Oantisym(v_r,t_a)
| v_a = v_b ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_52]) ).
cnf(c_301,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_300,c_51,c_290,c_49]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LAT259-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 10:16:39 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.69/1.14 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.69/1.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14 ------ iProver source info
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 1.69/1.14 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 1.69/1.14 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.69/1.14 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14 ------ Parsing...successful
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.69/1.14 ------ Proving...
% 1.69/1.14 ------ Problem Properties
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14 clauses 7
% 1.69/1.14 conjectures 3
% 1.69/1.14 EPR 1
% 1.69/1.14 Horn 7
% 1.69/1.14 unary 5
% 1.69/1.14 binary 1
% 1.69/1.14 lits 11
% 1.69/1.14 lits eq 3
% 1.69/1.14 fd_pure 0
% 1.69/1.14 fd_pseudo 0
% 1.69/1.14 fd_cond 0
% 1.69/1.14 fd_pseudo_cond 1
% 1.69/1.14 AC symbols 0
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14 ------
% 1.69/1.14 Current options:
% 1.69/1.14 ------
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14 ------ Proving...
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.69/1.14
% 1.69/1.14
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------