TSTP Solution File: LAT259-2 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : LAT259-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:39:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.34s
% Output : Proof 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(v_b,v_a,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
~ sPE(v_a,v_b),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
sPE(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
sPE(tc_prod(t_a,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ sPE(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a))
| ~ sPE(v_r,c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
| ~ sPE(tc_prod(t_a,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
| c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
sPE(v_r,c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_b,v_a,t_a,t_a),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
| ~ c_Relation_Oantisym(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),t_a)
| sPE(v_a,v_b) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Relation_Oantisym__def_0)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
sPE(c_Pair(v_b,v_a,t_a,t_a),c_Pair(v_b,v_a,t_a,t_a)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
( ~ sPE(c_Pair(v_b,v_a,t_a,t_a),c_Pair(v_b,v_a,t_a,t_a))
| ~ sPE(v_r,c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
| ~ sPE(tc_prod(t_a,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_b,v_a,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
| c_in(c_Pair(v_b,v_a,t_a,t_a),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
| c_Relation_Oantisym(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),t_a) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_1)]) ).
cnf(g11,plain,
c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : LAT259-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 12:30:36 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % symbols: 15
% 0.13/0.34 % clauses: 16
% 0.13/0.34 % start clauses: 3
% 0.13/0.34 % iterative deepening steps: 86
% 0.13/0.34 % maximum path limit: 3
% 0.13/0.34 % literal attempts: 4018
% 0.13/0.34 % depth failures: 2331
% 0.13/0.34 % regularity failures: 89
% 0.13/0.34 % tautology failures: 243
% 0.13/0.34 % reductions: 5
% 0.13/0.34 % extensions: 3756
% 0.13/0.34 % SAT variables: 697
% 0.13/0.34 % SAT clauses: 960
% 0.13/0.34 % WalkSAT solutions: 952
% 0.13/0.34 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.13/0.34 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.34 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------