TSTP Solution File: LAT259-2 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : LAT259-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:00:16 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   20
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  12 unt;  13 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   18 (  10   ~;   8   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   16 (   6   >;  10   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   7 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    v_a: $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    v_b: $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    t_a: $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    c_Pair: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    v_r: $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    tc_prod: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    c_in: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    c_Relation_Oantisym: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    c_Tarski_OPartialOrder: $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    tc_Product__Type_Ounit: $i ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    v_cl: $i ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_1,axiom,
    ( c_Relation_Oantisym(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X2)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_1) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0,axiom,
    v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0,axiom,
    c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0) ).

cnf(cls_Relation_Oantisym__def_0,axiom,
    ( X4 = X3
    | ~ c_Relation_Oantisym(X1,X2)
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X3,X4,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X4,X3,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Relation_Oantisym__def_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_b,v_a,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    v_a != v_b,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    ( c_Relation_Oantisym(c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X2)
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)) ),
    cls_Tarski_OPartialOrder__iff_1 ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    c_in(v_cl,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    cls_Tarski_Ocl_A_58_APartialOrder_0 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    ( X4 = X3
    | ~ c_Relation_Oantisym(X1,X2)
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X3,X4,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X4,X3,X2,X2),X1,tc_prod(X2,X2)) ),
    cls_Relation_Oantisym__def_0 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_b,v_a,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    c_Relation_Oantisym(v_r,t_a),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_b,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    v_a != v_b,
    cls_conjecture_2 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : LAT259-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime   : Thu Aug 24 10:02:50 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.53  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.54  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.15/0.54  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.54  % Proof found
% 0.15/0.54  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.54  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.54  % Total time : 0.003000 s
% 0.15/0.54  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.15/0.54  % Total time : 0.005000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------