TSTP Solution File: LAT253-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : LAT253-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:49:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.09 % Problem : LAT253-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.06/0.10 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Tue Jun 28 17:58:57 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.32 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.32 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_____X1276__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.15/0.32 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 0.15/0.32 #
% 0.15/0.32 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.32 # Number of axioms: 14 Number of unprocessed: 14
% 0.15/0.32 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.15/0.32 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.15/0.32 # Hello from C++
% 0.15/0.32 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.15/0.32 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.15/0.32 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.15/0.32 # 14 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.15/0.32 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.15/0.32 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.15/0.32 # Found 13 unit axioms.
% 0.15/0.32 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.15/0.32 # 1 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.15/0.32 # 13 unit axiom clauses
% 0.15/0.32
% 0.15/0.32 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.15/0.32 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.15/0.32 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.15/0.32 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.15/0.32 # Returning from population with 22 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.15/0.32 # We now have 22 tableaux to operate on
% 0.15/0.44 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.44 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.44 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.44 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.44 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.44 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.44 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.44 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.44 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.44 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.44 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.44
% 0.15/0.44 # End clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.44 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (meet(X1,complement(X1))=zero)).
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (join(X1,complement(X1))=one)).
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (meet(X1,X1)=X1)).
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (join(X1,X1)=X1)).
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (meet(X1,join(X1,X2))=X1)).
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (join(X1,meet(X1,X2))=X1)).
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_27, hypothesis, (meet(a,b)=a)).
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (meet(meet(X1,X2),X3)=meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)))).
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (join(join(X1,X2),X3)=join(X1,join(X2,X3)))).
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (meet(X1,join(X2,meet(X3,join(X4,meet(X1,X2)))))=meet(X1,join(X2,meet(X3,join(X2,X4)))))).
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (meet(X1,X2)=meet(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (join(X1,X2)=join(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (join(complement(a),complement(b))!=complement(a))).
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (complement(X1)=X2|meet(X1,X2)!=zero|join(X1,X2)!=one)).
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (X5=X5)).
% 0.15/0.44 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.15/0.44 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.15/0.44 # Found 5 steps
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (meet(X4,complement(X4))=zero), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (meet(X4,complement(X4))=zero), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_45])).
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_79, plain, (complement(meet(X4,complement(X4)))=complement(zero)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_42])).
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_90, plain, (complement(zero)!=meet(complement(zero),complement(zero))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.15/0.44 cnf(i_0_88, plain, (complement(meet(X4,complement(X4)))=meet(complement(zero),complement(zero))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_88, ...])).
% 0.15/0.44 # End printing tableau
% 0.15/0.44 # SZS output end
% 0.15/0.44 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.15/0.44 # Child (25186) has found a proof.
% 0.15/0.44
% 0.15/0.44 # Proof search is over...
% 0.15/0.44 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------