TSTP Solution File: LAT249-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : LAT249-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:10:12 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   42 (  40 unt;   0 nHn;  11 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   46 (  45 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (  10 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(absorption1,axiom,
    meet(X1,join(X1,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.f5Vf9rHokz/E---3.1_18205.p',absorption1) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_join,axiom,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.f5Vf9rHokz/E---3.1_18205.p',commutativity_of_join) ).

cnf(absorption2,axiom,
    join(X1,meet(X1,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.f5Vf9rHokz/E---3.1_18205.p',absorption2) ).

cnf(complement_meet,axiom,
    meet(X1,complement(X1)) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.f5Vf9rHokz/E---3.1_18205.p',complement_meet) ).

cnf(prove_distributivity_hypothesis,hypothesis,
    meet(b,a) = a,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.f5Vf9rHokz/E---3.1_18205.p',prove_distributivity_hypothesis) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_meet,axiom,
    meet(X1,X2) = meet(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.f5Vf9rHokz/E---3.1_18205.p',commutativity_of_meet) ).

cnf(associativity_of_join,axiom,
    join(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(X1,join(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.f5Vf9rHokz/E---3.1_18205.p',associativity_of_join) ).

cnf(idempotence_of_join,axiom,
    join(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.f5Vf9rHokz/E---3.1_18205.p',idempotence_of_join) ).

cnf(associativity_of_meet,axiom,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),X3) = meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.f5Vf9rHokz/E---3.1_18205.p',associativity_of_meet) ).

cnf(complement_join,axiom,
    join(X1,complement(X1)) = one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.f5Vf9rHokz/E---3.1_18205.p',complement_join) ).

cnf(equation_H64,axiom,
    meet(X1,join(X2,X3)) = meet(X1,join(X2,meet(X1,join(X3,meet(X1,join(X2,meet(X1,X3))))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.f5Vf9rHokz/E---3.1_18205.p',equation_H64) ).

cnf(prove_distributivity,negated_conjecture,
    join(complement(b),complement(a)) != complement(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.f5Vf9rHokz/E---3.1_18205.p',prove_distributivity) ).

cnf(meet_join_complement,axiom,
    ( complement(X1) = X2
    | meet(X1,X2) != zero
    | join(X1,X2) != one ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.f5Vf9rHokz/E---3.1_18205.p',meet_join_complement) ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    meet(X1,join(X1,X2)) = X1,
    absorption1 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    commutativity_of_join ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    join(X1,meet(X1,X2)) = X1,
    absorption2 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    meet(X1,complement(X1)) = zero,
    complement_meet ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    meet(b,a) = a,
    prove_distributivity_hypothesis ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    meet(X1,X2) = meet(X2,X1),
    commutativity_of_meet ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    meet(X1,join(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    join(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    join(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(X1,join(X2,X3)),
    associativity_of_join ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    join(X1,X1) = X1,
    idempotence_of_join ).

cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),X3) = meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)),
    associativity_of_meet ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    meet(a,b) = a,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    meet(zero,X1) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    join(X1,join(X1,X2)) = join(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    join(X1,complement(X1)) = one,
    complement_join ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    meet(X1,join(X2,X3)) = meet(X1,join(X2,meet(X1,join(X3,meet(X1,join(X2,meet(X1,X3))))))),
    equation_H64 ).

cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
    meet(a,meet(b,X1)) = meet(a,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    meet(X1,zero) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    join(X1,one) = one,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    meet(X1,join(X2,meet(X1,join(complement(X1),meet(X1,X2))))) = meet(X1,join(X2,complement(X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_16]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,hypothesis,
    meet(a,complement(b)) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_16]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    join(X1,join(complement(X1),X2)) = join(one,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    join(one,X1) = one,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    join(complement(b),complement(a)) != complement(a),
    prove_distributivity ).

cnf(c_0_37,axiom,
    ( complement(X1) = X2
    | meet(X1,X2) != zero
    | join(X1,X2) != one ),
    meet_join_complement ).

cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
    meet(a,join(complement(a),complement(b))) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_20]),c_0_16]),c_0_20]),c_0_33]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    join(X1,join(complement(X1),X2)) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    join(complement(a),complement(b)) != complement(a),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39])]),c_0_40]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : LAT249-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 10:29:28 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.49  Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.f5Vf9rHokz/E---3.1_18205.p
% 0.22/0.55  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.55  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.55  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 18282 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.22/0.55  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.55  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.55  # Search class: FHUPM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.55  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting E---G----_X1276__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 18288 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.22/0.55  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.55  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.55  # Search class: FHUPM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.55  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting E---G----_X1276__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.55  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.55  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.55  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.55  # Parsed axioms                        : 14
% 0.22/0.55  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Initial clauses                      : 14
% 0.22/0.55  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
% 0.22/0.55  # Processed clauses                    : 219
% 0.22/0.55  # ...of these trivial                  : 47
% 0.22/0.55  # ...subsumed                          : 59
% 0.22/0.55  # ...remaining for further processing  : 113
% 0.22/0.55  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Backward-subsumed                    : 11
% 0.22/0.55  # Backward-rewritten                   : 19
% 0.22/0.55  # Generated clauses                    : 2926
% 0.22/0.55  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1885
% 0.22/0.55  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.22/0.55  # Paramodulations                      : 2925
% 0.22/0.55  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.22/0.55  # Total rewrite steps                  : 4162
% 0.22/0.55  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.55  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.55  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.55  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.55  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.55  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.55  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.55  # Current number of processed clauses  : 83
% 0.22/0.55  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 57
% 0.22/0.55  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 6
% 0.22/0.55  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.22/0.55  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 17
% 0.22/0.55  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1661
% 0.22/0.55  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2332
% 0.22/0.55  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Current number of archived clauses   : 30
% 0.22/0.55  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 170
% 0.22/0.55  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 113
% 0.22/0.55  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 36
% 0.22/0.55  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 32
% 0.22/0.55  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 126
% 0.22/0.55  # BW rewrite match successes           : 75
% 0.22/0.55  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.55  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 33717
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.55  # User time                : 0.035 s
% 0.22/0.55  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.55  # Total time               : 0.040 s
% 0.22/0.55  # Maximum resident set size: 1596 pages
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.55  # User time                : 0.158 s
% 0.22/0.55  # System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.22/0.55  # Total time               : 0.173 s
% 0.22/0.55  # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.22/0.55  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------