TSTP Solution File: LAT247-1 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : LAT247-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:27:56 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 45.04s 6.26s
% Output   : Proof 45.04s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : LAT247-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.15/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 07:50:17 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 45.04/6.26  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 45.04/6.26  
% 45.04/6.26  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 45.04/6.26  
% 45.04/6.27  % SZS output start Proof
% 45.04/6.27  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 45.04/6.27    fof(absorption1, axiom, ![X, Y]: meet(X, join(X, Y))=X).
% 45.04/6.27    fof(absorption2, axiom, ![X2, Y2]: join(X2, meet(X2, Y2))=X2).
% 45.04/6.27    fof(associativity_of_join, axiom, ![Z, X2, Y2]: join(join(X2, Y2), Z)=join(X2, join(Y2, Z))).
% 45.04/6.27    fof(associativity_of_meet, axiom, ![X2, Y2, Z2]: meet(meet(X2, Y2), Z2)=meet(X2, meet(Y2, Z2))).
% 45.04/6.27    fof(commutativity_of_join, axiom, ![X2, Y2]: join(X2, Y2)=join(Y2, X2)).
% 45.04/6.27    fof(commutativity_of_meet, axiom, ![X2, Y2]: meet(X2, Y2)=meet(Y2, X2)).
% 45.04/6.27    fof(complement_join, axiom, ![X2]: join(X2, complement(X2))=one).
% 45.04/6.27    fof(complement_meet, axiom, ![X2]: meet(X2, complement(X2))=zero).
% 45.04/6.27    fof(equation_H61, axiom, ![X2, Y2, Z2]: meet(join(X2, Y2), join(X2, Z2))=join(X2, meet(join(X2, Y2), join(meet(X2, Y2), Z2)))).
% 45.04/6.27    fof(idempotence_of_join, axiom, ![X2]: join(X2, X2)=X2).
% 45.04/6.27    fof(meet_join_complement, axiom, ![X2, Y2]: (meet(X2, Y2)!=zero | (join(X2, Y2)!=one | complement(X2)=Y2))).
% 45.04/6.27    fof(prove_distributivity, negated_conjecture, join(complement(b), complement(a))!=complement(a)).
% 45.04/6.27    fof(prove_distributivity_hypothesis, hypothesis, meet(b, a)=a).
% 45.04/6.27  
% 45.04/6.27  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 45.04/6.27  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 45.04/6.27  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 45.04/6.27    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 45.04/6.27    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 45.04/6.27  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 45.04/6.27  variables of u and v.
% 45.04/6.27  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 45.04/6.27  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 45.04/6.27  
% 45.04/6.27  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 45.04/6.27  
% 45.04/6.27  Axiom 1 (commutativity_of_meet): meet(X, Y) = meet(Y, X).
% 45.04/6.27  Axiom 2 (prove_distributivity_hypothesis): meet(b, a) = a.
% 45.04/6.27  Axiom 3 (idempotence_of_join): join(X, X) = X.
% 45.04/6.27  Axiom 4 (commutativity_of_join): join(X, Y) = join(Y, X).
% 45.04/6.27  Axiom 5 (complement_meet): meet(X, complement(X)) = zero.
% 45.04/6.27  Axiom 6 (complement_join): join(X, complement(X)) = one.
% 45.04/6.27  Axiom 7 (meet_join_complement): fresh(X, X, Y, Z) = Z.
% 45.04/6.27  Axiom 8 (meet_join_complement): fresh2(X, X, Y, Z) = complement(Y).
% 45.04/6.27  Axiom 9 (absorption1): meet(X, join(X, Y)) = X.
% 45.04/6.27  Axiom 10 (associativity_of_meet): meet(meet(X, Y), Z) = meet(X, meet(Y, Z)).
% 45.04/6.27  Axiom 11 (absorption2): join(X, meet(X, Y)) = X.
% 45.04/6.27  Axiom 12 (associativity_of_join): join(join(X, Y), Z) = join(X, join(Y, Z)).
% 45.04/6.27  Axiom 13 (meet_join_complement): fresh2(join(X, Y), one, X, Y) = fresh(meet(X, Y), zero, X, Y).
% 45.04/6.27  Axiom 14 (equation_H61): meet(join(X, Y), join(X, Z)) = join(X, meet(join(X, Y), join(meet(X, Y), Z))).
% 45.04/6.27  
% 45.04/6.27  Lemma 15: join(X, zero) = X.
% 45.04/6.27  Proof:
% 45.04/6.27    join(X, zero)
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 5 (complement_meet) R->L }
% 45.04/6.27    join(X, meet(X, complement(X)))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 11 (absorption2) }
% 45.04/6.27    X
% 45.04/6.27  
% 45.04/6.27  Lemma 16: join(zero, X) = X.
% 45.04/6.27  Proof:
% 45.04/6.27    join(zero, X)
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 45.04/6.27    join(X, zero)
% 45.04/6.27  = { by lemma 15 }
% 45.04/6.27    X
% 45.04/6.27  
% 45.04/6.27  Lemma 17: meet(a, complement(b)) = zero.
% 45.04/6.27  Proof:
% 45.04/6.27    meet(a, complement(b))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 2 (prove_distributivity_hypothesis) R->L }
% 45.04/6.27    meet(meet(b, a), complement(b))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 10 (associativity_of_meet) }
% 45.04/6.27    meet(b, meet(a, complement(b)))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 1 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 45.04/6.27    meet(b, meet(complement(b), a))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 10 (associativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 45.04/6.27    meet(meet(b, complement(b)), a)
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 5 (complement_meet) }
% 45.04/6.27    meet(zero, a)
% 45.04/6.27  = { by lemma 16 R->L }
% 45.04/6.27    meet(zero, join(zero, a))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 9 (absorption1) }
% 45.04/6.27    zero
% 45.04/6.27  
% 45.04/6.27  Lemma 18: join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))) = complement(a).
% 45.04/6.27  Proof:
% 45.04/6.27    join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 7 (meet_join_complement) R->L }
% 45.04/6.27    fresh(zero, zero, a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by lemma 17 R->L }
% 45.04/6.27    fresh(meet(a, complement(b)), zero, a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by lemma 15 R->L }
% 45.04/6.27    fresh(meet(a, join(complement(b), zero)), zero, a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 5 (complement_meet) R->L }
% 45.04/6.27    fresh(meet(a, join(complement(b), meet(join(a, complement(b)), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))), zero, a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 45.04/6.27    fresh(meet(a, join(complement(b), meet(join(complement(b), a), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))), zero, a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by lemma 16 R->L }
% 45.04/6.27    fresh(meet(a, join(complement(b), meet(join(complement(b), a), join(zero, complement(join(a, complement(b))))))), zero, a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by lemma 17 R->L }
% 45.04/6.27    fresh(meet(a, join(complement(b), meet(join(complement(b), a), join(meet(a, complement(b)), complement(join(a, complement(b))))))), zero, a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 1 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 45.04/6.27    fresh(meet(a, join(complement(b), meet(join(complement(b), a), join(meet(complement(b), a), complement(join(a, complement(b))))))), zero, a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 14 (equation_H61) R->L }
% 45.04/6.27    fresh(meet(a, meet(join(complement(b), a), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))), zero, a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_join) }
% 45.04/6.27    fresh(meet(a, meet(join(a, complement(b)), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))), zero, a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 10 (associativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 45.04/6.27    fresh(meet(meet(a, join(a, complement(b))), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), zero, a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 9 (absorption1) }
% 45.04/6.27    fresh(meet(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), zero, a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 13 (meet_join_complement) R->L }
% 45.04/6.27    fresh2(join(a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))), one, a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 12 (associativity_of_join) R->L }
% 45.04/6.27    fresh2(join(join(a, complement(b)), complement(join(a, complement(b)))), one, a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 6 (complement_join) }
% 45.04/6.27    fresh2(one, one, a, join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 45.04/6.27  = { by axiom 8 (meet_join_complement) }
% 45.04/6.27    complement(a)
% 45.04/6.27  
% 45.04/6.27  Goal 1 (prove_distributivity): join(complement(b), complement(a)) = complement(a).
% 45.04/6.27  Proof:
% 45.04/6.28    join(complement(b), complement(a))
% 45.04/6.28  = { by lemma 18 R->L }
% 45.04/6.28    join(complement(b), join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b)))))
% 45.04/6.28  = { by axiom 12 (associativity_of_join) R->L }
% 45.04/6.28    join(join(complement(b), complement(b)), complement(join(a, complement(b))))
% 45.04/6.28  = { by axiom 3 (idempotence_of_join) }
% 45.04/6.28    join(complement(b), complement(join(a, complement(b))))
% 45.04/6.28  = { by lemma 18 }
% 45.04/6.28    complement(a)
% 45.04/6.28  % SZS output end Proof
% 45.04/6.28  
% 45.04/6.28  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------