TSTP Solution File: LAT235-1 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : LAT235-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:00:09 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.75s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 20
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 56 ( 46 unt; 7 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 54 ( 53 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 13 ( 8 ~; 5 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 5 ( 3 >; 2 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 72 ( 11 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
meet: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_23,type,
join: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_24,type,
complement: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
one: $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
zero: $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
b: $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
a: $i ).
cnf(absorption2,axiom,
join(X1,meet(X1,X2)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',absorption2) ).
cnf(commutativity_of_meet,axiom,
meet(X1,X2) = meet(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_meet) ).
cnf(prove_distributivity_hypothesis,hypothesis,
meet(b,a) = a,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_distributivity_hypothesis) ).
cnf(absorption1,axiom,
meet(X1,join(X1,X2)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',absorption1) ).
cnf(complement_join,axiom,
join(X1,complement(X1)) = one,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-4.ax',complement_join) ).
cnf(associativity_of_join,axiom,
join(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(X1,join(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',associativity_of_join) ).
cnf(idempotence_of_join,axiom,
join(X1,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',idempotence_of_join) ).
cnf(equation_H34,axiom,
meet(X1,join(X2,meet(X3,X4))) = meet(X1,join(X2,meet(X3,join(X2,meet(X4,join(X2,X3)))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equation_H34) ).
cnf(complement_meet,axiom,
meet(X1,complement(X1)) = zero,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-4.ax',complement_meet) ).
cnf(associativity_of_meet,axiom,
meet(meet(X1,X2),X3) = meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',associativity_of_meet) ).
cnf(commutativity_of_join,axiom,
join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_join) ).
cnf(meet_join_complement,axiom,
( complement(X1) = X2
| meet(X1,X2) != zero
| join(X1,X2) != one ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-4.ax',meet_join_complement) ).
cnf(prove_distributivity,negated_conjecture,
join(complement(b),complement(a)) != complement(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_distributivity) ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
join(X1,meet(X1,X2)) = X1,
absorption2 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
meet(X1,X2) = meet(X2,X1),
commutativity_of_meet ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
meet(b,a) = a,
prove_distributivity_hypothesis ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
meet(X1,join(X1,X2)) = X1,
absorption1 ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
join(X1,complement(X1)) = one,
complement_join ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
join(X1,meet(X2,X1)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
meet(a,b) = a,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
meet(X1,one) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
join(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(X1,join(X2,X3)),
associativity_of_join ).
cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
join(b,a) = b,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
join(X1,X1) = X1,
idempotence_of_join ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
meet(one,X1) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
join(b,join(a,X1)) = join(b,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
join(X1,join(X1,X2)) = join(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
join(one,X1) = one,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
meet(X1,join(X2,meet(X3,X4))) = meet(X1,join(X2,meet(X3,join(X2,meet(X4,join(X2,X3)))))),
equation_H34 ).
cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
join(b,complement(a)) = join(b,one),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
join(X1,one) = one,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
join(X1,join(X2,X1)) = join(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_16]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
join(X1,join(complement(X1),X2)) = one,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_17]),c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,axiom,
meet(X1,complement(X1)) = zero,
complement_meet ).
cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
meet(meet(X1,X2),X3) = meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)),
associativity_of_meet ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
join(X1,meet(X2,join(X1,meet(X3,join(X1,X2))))) = join(X1,meet(X2,X3)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_28]),c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
join(b,complement(a)) = one,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
join(complement(X1),join(X2,X1)) = one,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_30]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,axiom,
join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
commutativity_of_join ).
cnf(c_0_39,axiom,
( complement(X1) = X2
| meet(X1,X2) != zero
| join(X1,X2) != one ),
meet_join_complement ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
meet(X1,meet(X2,complement(meet(X1,X2)))) = zero,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,hypothesis,
join(b,meet(complement(a),join(b,X1))) = join(b,meet(complement(a),X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
join(X1,complement(meet(X1,X2))) = one,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_13]),c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( meet(X1,complement(meet(X2,X1))) = complement(X2)
| join(X2,meet(X1,complement(meet(X2,X1)))) != one ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,hypothesis,
join(b,meet(complement(a),complement(meet(b,X1)))) = one,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_20]),c_0_29]),c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
join(complement(b),complement(a)) != complement(a),
prove_distributivity ).
cnf(c_0_46,hypothesis,
meet(complement(a),complement(meet(b,complement(a)))) = complement(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
join(complement(a),complement(b)) != complement(a),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_46]),c_0_47]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LAT235-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 06:22:08 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.60 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.75 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.17/0.75 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.75 % Proof found
% 0.17/0.75 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.75 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.76 % Total time : 0.146000 s
% 0.17/0.76 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.17/0.76 % Total time : 0.148000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------