TSTP Solution File: LAT168-1 by E-SAT---3.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.2.0
% Problem : LAT168-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d SAT
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 10:22:18 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 100.97s 13.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 100.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 36 ( 36 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 36 ( 35 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 81 ( 13 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(absorption2,axiom,
join(X1,meet(X1,X2)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WvfHwuh6C7/E---3.1_6672.p',absorption2) ).
cnf(commutativity_of_meet,axiom,
meet(X1,X2) = meet(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WvfHwuh6C7/E---3.1_6672.p',commutativity_of_meet) ).
cnf(associativity_of_meet,axiom,
meet(meet(X1,X2),X3) = meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WvfHwuh6C7/E---3.1_6672.p',associativity_of_meet) ).
cnf(idempotence_of_meet,axiom,
meet(X1,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WvfHwuh6C7/E---3.1_6672.p',idempotence_of_meet) ).
cnf(absorption1,axiom,
meet(X1,join(X1,X2)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WvfHwuh6C7/E---3.1_6672.p',absorption1) ).
cnf(commutativity_of_join,axiom,
join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WvfHwuh6C7/E---3.1_6672.p',commutativity_of_join) ).
cnf(associativity_of_join,axiom,
join(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(X1,join(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WvfHwuh6C7/E---3.1_6672.p',associativity_of_join) ).
cnf(equation_H18_dual,axiom,
meet(join(X1,X2),join(X1,X3)) = join(X1,meet(join(X1,X2),meet(join(X1,X3),join(X2,meet(X1,X3))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WvfHwuh6C7/E---3.1_6672.p',equation_H18_dual) ).
cnf(prove_H58,negated_conjecture,
meet(a,join(b,c)) != meet(a,join(b,meet(join(a,b),join(c,meet(a,b))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WvfHwuh6C7/E---3.1_6672.p',prove_H58) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
join(X1,meet(X1,X2)) = X1,
absorption2 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
meet(X1,X2) = meet(X2,X1),
commutativity_of_meet ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
meet(meet(X1,X2),X3) = meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)),
associativity_of_meet ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
meet(X1,X1) = X1,
idempotence_of_meet ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
join(X1,meet(X2,X1)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
meet(X1,join(X1,X2)) = X1,
absorption1 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
commutativity_of_join ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
meet(X1,meet(X1,X2)) = meet(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
join(X1,meet(X2,meet(X3,X1))) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
meet(X1,join(X2,X1)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
meet(X1,meet(X2,X1)) = meet(X2,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
join(X1,meet(X2,meet(X1,X3))) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
meet(X1,meet(join(X1,X2),X3)) = meet(X1,X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
join(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(X1,join(X2,X3)),
associativity_of_join ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
meet(X1,meet(join(X2,X1),X3)) = meet(X1,X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
meet(X1,meet(X2,meet(X1,X3))) = meet(X2,meet(X1,X3)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_19]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
join(X1,join(X2,meet(X1,X3))) = join(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)) = meet(X2,meet(X1,X3)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_9]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
meet(join(X1,X2),join(X2,meet(X1,X3))) = join(X2,meet(X1,X3)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_25]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
meet(join(X1,X2),join(X1,X3)) = join(X1,meet(join(X1,X2),meet(join(X1,X3),join(X2,meet(X1,X3))))),
equation_H18_dual ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
meet(join(X1,X2),meet(X3,join(X2,meet(X1,X4)))) = meet(X3,join(X2,meet(X1,X4))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
join(X1,meet(join(X1,X2),join(X3,meet(X1,X2)))) = meet(join(X1,X3),join(X1,X2)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
meet(a,join(b,c)) != meet(a,join(b,meet(join(a,b),join(c,meet(a,b))))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_H58]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
join(X1,meet(join(X1,X2),join(X3,meet(X2,X1)))) = meet(join(X1,X3),join(X1,X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
meet(a,join(b,c)) != meet(a,join(b,meet(join(a,b),join(c,meet(a,b))))),
c_0_31 ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
join(X1,meet(join(X2,X1),join(X3,meet(X2,X1)))) = meet(join(X1,X3),join(X2,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_10]),c_0_21])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LAT168-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d SAT
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 21 22:12:39 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WvfHwuh6C7/E---3.1_6672.p
% 100.97/13.40 # Version: 3.2.0
% 100.97/13.40 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 100.97/13.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 100.97/13.40 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 100.97/13.40 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 100.97/13.40 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 100.97/13.40 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 100.97/13.40 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 6753 completed with status 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 100.97/13.40 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 100.97/13.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 100.97/13.40 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 100.97/13.40 # No SInE strategy applied
% 100.97/13.40 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 100.97/13.40 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 100.97/13.40 # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 406s (1) cores
% 100.97/13.40 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 100.97/13.40 # Starting U----_206d_05_C11_08_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 100.97/13.40 # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 100.97/13.40 # Starting G-E--_300_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 100.97/13.40 # U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 6761 completed with status 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Result found by U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 100.97/13.40 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 100.97/13.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 100.97/13.40 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 100.97/13.40 # No SInE strategy applied
% 100.97/13.40 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 100.97/13.40 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 100.97/13.40 # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 406s (1) cores
% 100.97/13.40 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 100.97/13.40 # Starting U----_206d_05_C11_08_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 100.97/13.40 # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 100.97/13.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 100.97/13.40 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 100.97/13.40
% 100.97/13.40 # Proof found!
% 100.97/13.40 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 100.97/13.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 100.97/13.40 # Parsed axioms : 10
% 100.97/13.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Initial clauses : 10
% 100.97/13.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 100.97/13.40 # Processed clauses : 56087
% 100.97/13.40 # ...of these trivial : 27336
% 100.97/13.40 # ...subsumed : 27948
% 100.97/13.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 803
% 100.97/13.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 100.97/13.40 # Generated clauses : 896279
% 100.97/13.40 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 553278
% 100.97/13.40 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Paramodulations : 896279
% 100.97/13.40 # Factorizations : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # NegExts : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Total rewrite steps : 1411384
% 100.97/13.40 # ...of those cached : 1134491
% 100.97/13.40 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Propositional check models : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 100.97/13.40 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 100.97/13.40 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 100.97/13.40 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 100.97/13.40 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 100.97/13.40 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 100.97/13.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 789
% 100.97/13.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 779
% 100.97/13.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 10
% 100.97/13.40 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 497151
% 100.97/13.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 497151
% 100.97/13.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 14
% 100.97/13.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 66
% 100.97/13.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 24115
% 100.97/13.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 291
% 100.97/13.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 100.97/13.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 11083122
% 100.97/13.40 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 100.97/13.40
% 100.97/13.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 100.97/13.40 # User time : 12.119 s
% 100.97/13.40 # System time : 0.455 s
% 100.97/13.40 # Total time : 12.574 s
% 100.97/13.40 # Maximum resident set size: 1556 pages
% 100.97/13.40
% 100.97/13.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 100.97/13.40 # User time : 60.686 s
% 100.97/13.40 # System time : 2.181 s
% 100.97/13.40 # Total time : 62.867 s
% 100.97/13.40 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 100.97/13.40 % E---3.1 exiting
% 100.97/13.40 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------