TSTP Solution File: LAT090-1 by Moca---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Moca---0.1
% Problem  : LAT090-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : moca.sh %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:04:34 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 5.58s 5.72s
% Output   : Proof 5.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : LAT090-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.04/0.12  % Command  : moca.sh %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 10:50:48 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.58/5.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 5.58/5.72  % SZS output start Proof
% 5.58/5.72  The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 5.58/5.72  
% 5.58/5.72  [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 5.58/5.72  
% 5.58/5.72  	join(meet(A, B), meet(A, join(A, B))) = A
% 5.58/5.72  	join(meet(A, A), meet(B, join(A, A))) = A
% 5.58/5.72  	join(meet(A, B), meet(B, join(A, B))) = B
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(join(A, B), join(C, A)), A) = A
% 5.58/5.72  	join(join(meet(A, B), meet(C, A)), A) = A
% 5.58/5.72  	join(a, a) = a ==> \bottom
% 5.58/5.72  
% 5.58/5.72  This holds because
% 5.58/5.72  
% 5.58/5.72  [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 5.58/5.72  
% 5.58/5.72  E:
% 5.58/5.72  	f1(a) = false__
% 5.58/5.72  	f1(join(a, a)) = true__
% 5.58/5.72  	join(join(meet(A, B), meet(C, A)), A) = A
% 5.58/5.72  	join(meet(A, A), meet(B, join(A, A))) = A
% 5.58/5.72  	join(meet(A, B), meet(A, join(A, B))) = A
% 5.58/5.72  	join(meet(A, B), meet(B, join(A, B))) = B
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(join(A, B), join(C, A)), A) = A
% 5.58/5.72  G:
% 5.58/5.72  	true__ = false__
% 5.58/5.72  
% 5.58/5.72  This holds because
% 5.58/5.72  
% 5.58/5.72  [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 5.58/5.72  
% 5.58/5.72  
% 5.58/5.72  	f1(a) -> false__
% 5.58/5.72  	f1(join(a, a)) -> true__
% 5.58/5.72  	join(Y0, meet(Y1, Y0)) -> Y0
% 5.58/5.72  	join(Y0, meet(Y1, join(Y0, Y0))) -> Y0
% 5.58/5.72  	join(Y1, Y1) -> Y1
% 5.58/5.72  	join(Y1, meet(Y1, join(meet(Y1, join(X1, Y1)), Y1))) -> Y1
% 5.58/5.72  	join(Y1, meet(Y1, join(meet(join(Y1, X1), Y1), Y1))) -> Y1
% 5.58/5.72  	join(Y1, meet(Y1, join(meet(join(Y1, X1), join(X2, Y1)), Y1))) -> Y1
% 5.58/5.72  	join(join(Y1, meet(Y1, join(X1, Y1))), meet(Y1, join(X1, Y1))) -> meet(Y1, join(X1, Y1))
% 5.58/5.72  	join(join(Y1, meet(Y2, Y1)), Y1) -> Y1
% 5.58/5.72  	join(join(Y1, meet(join(Y1, X1), Y1)), meet(join(Y1, X1), Y1)) -> meet(join(Y1, X1), Y1)
% 5.58/5.72  	join(join(meet(A, B), meet(C, A)), A) -> A
% 5.58/5.72  	join(join(meet(Y0, Y1), Y0), Y0) -> Y0
% 5.58/5.72  	join(meet(A, B), meet(A, join(A, B))) -> A
% 5.58/5.72  	join(meet(A, B), meet(B, join(A, B))) -> B
% 5.58/5.72  	join(meet(Y0, meet(Y0, join(meet(join(Y0, X1), Y0), Y0))), meet(Y0, Y0)) -> Y0
% 5.58/5.72  	join(meet(join(meet(Y0, Y1), Y0), Y0), Y0) -> Y0
% 5.58/5.72  	join(meet(join(meet(Y1, X1), meet(X2, Y1)), Y1), meet(Y1, Y1)) -> Y1
% 5.58/5.72  	join(meet(meet(X0, X0), meet(X1, join(X0, X0))), meet(meet(X0, X0), X0)) -> X0
% 5.58/5.72  	join(meet(meet(X0, X1), meet(X0, join(X0, X1))), meet(meet(X0, X1), X0)) -> meet(X0, X1)
% 5.58/5.72  	join(meet(meet(X0, X1), meet(X1, join(X0, X1))), meet(meet(X0, X1), X1)) -> meet(X0, X1)
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(Y1, Y1) -> Y1
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(join(meet(Y1, X1), Y1), Y1) -> join(meet(Y1, X1), Y1)
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(X0, join(Y2, meet(X0, X1))), meet(X0, X1)) -> meet(X0, X1)
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(X0, meet(X0, X1)), meet(X0, X1)) -> meet(X0, X1)
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(X1, join(Y2, meet(X0, X1))), meet(X0, X1)) -> meet(X0, X1)
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(X1, meet(X0, X1)), meet(X0, X1)) -> meet(X0, X1)
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(Y0, Y0), meet(Y0, join(X0, Y0))) -> meet(Y0, join(X0, Y0))
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(Y0, Y0), meet(Y0, join(Y0, X1))) -> meet(Y0, join(Y0, X1))
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(Y0, join(Y1, Y0)), Y0) -> Y0
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(Y1, join(Y1, meet(X1, Y1))), join(Y1, meet(X1, Y1))) -> join(Y1, meet(X1, Y1))
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(Y1, join(meet(Y1, X1), Y1)), join(meet(Y1, X1), Y1)) -> join(meet(Y1, X1), Y1)
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(join(A, B), join(C, A)), A) -> A
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(join(X0, X0), X0), meet(Y2, join(X0, X0))) -> meet(Y2, X0)
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(join(Y0, Y1), Y0), Y0) -> Y0
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(join(Y2, X1), Y2), meet(Y2, join(Y2, X1))) -> meet(Y2, join(Y2, X1))
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(meet(X0, X1), meet(X0, X1)), meet(meet(X0, X1), X0)) -> meet(meet(X0, X1), X0)
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(meet(X0, join(X0, X1)), X0), meet(X0, join(X0, X1))) -> meet(X0, join(X0, X1))
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(meet(X1, Y1), Y1), meet(X1, Y1)) -> meet(X1, Y1)
% 5.58/5.72  	meet(meet(meet(join(Y2, X1), Y2), join(Y1, Y2)), Y2) -> Y2
% 5.58/5.72  	true__ -> false__
% 5.58/5.72  with the LPO induced by
% 5.58/5.72  	join > meet > a > f1 > true__ > false__
% 5.58/5.72  
% 5.58/5.72  % SZS output end Proof
% 5.58/5.72  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------