TSTP Solution File: LAT090-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : LAT090-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:07:49 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 17 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 10 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(wal_absorbtion_4,axiom,
meet(meet(join(X1,X2),join(X3,X1)),X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6PSAjDhKDT/E---3.1_8211.p',wal_absorbtion_4) ).
cnf(wal_absorbtion_5,axiom,
join(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X3,X1)),X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6PSAjDhKDT/E---3.1_8211.p',wal_absorbtion_5) ).
cnf(wal_absorbtion_1,axiom,
join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X1,join(X1,X2))) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6PSAjDhKDT/E---3.1_8211.p',wal_absorbtion_1) ).
cnf(wal_absorbtion_3,axiom,
join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6PSAjDhKDT/E---3.1_8211.p',wal_absorbtion_3) ).
cnf(prove_normal_axioms_3,negated_conjecture,
join(a,a) != a,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6PSAjDhKDT/E---3.1_8211.p',prove_normal_axioms_3) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
meet(meet(join(X1,X2),join(X3,X1)),X1) = X1,
wal_absorbtion_4 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
join(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X3,X1)),X1) = X1,
wal_absorbtion_5 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
meet(meet(join(X1,X2),X1),X1) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X1,join(X1,X2))) = X1,
wal_absorbtion_1 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
meet(meet(X1,meet(X1,X2)),meet(X1,X2)) = meet(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
join(join(meet(X1,X2),X1),X1) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
meet(X1,X1) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_5]),c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))) = X2,
wal_absorbtion_3 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
join(join(X1,X1),X1) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
meet(join(X1,X1),X1) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
join(a,a) != a,
prove_normal_axioms_3 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
join(X1,X1) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.11 % Problem : LAT090-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.05/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 11:12:14 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6PSAjDhKDT/E---3.1_8211.p
% 0.17/0.45 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 8289 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.17/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.45 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 406s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting U----_206d_05_C11_08_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting G-E--_300_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 8299 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Result found by U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.17/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.45 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 406s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting U----_206d_05_C11_08_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.45
% 0.17/0.45 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.45 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.45 # Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.17/0.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Initial clauses : 6
% 0.17/0.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.17/0.45 # Processed clauses : 26
% 0.17/0.45 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.17/0.45 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 22
% 0.17/0.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Backward-rewritten : 7
% 0.17/0.45 # Generated clauses : 87
% 0.17/0.45 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 71
% 0.17/0.45 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Paramodulations : 87
% 0.17/0.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Total rewrite steps : 39
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.17/0.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.17/0.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 57
% 0.17/0.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 57
% 0.17/0.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 13
% 0.17/0.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 34
% 0.17/0.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.17/0.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 742
% 0.17/0.45
% 0.17/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.45 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.45 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1512 pages
% 0.17/0.45
% 0.17/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.45 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.17/0.45 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.17/0.45 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.45 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------