TSTP Solution File: LAT088-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : LAT088-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:46:19 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.30s 1.87s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  14 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   14 (  13 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   2   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (;  25   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ meet > join > #nlpp > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(join,type,
    join: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(meet,type,
    meet: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_32,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : ( join(join(meet(A,B),meet(C,A)),A) = A ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_30,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : ( meet(meet(join(A,B),join(C,A)),A) = A ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_24,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ( join(meet(A,B),meet(A,join(A,B))) = A ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_34,axiom,
    meet(a,a) != a,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [A_10,B_11,C_12] : ( join(join(meet(A_10,B_11),meet(C_12,A_10)),A_10) = A_10 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).

tff(c_109,plain,
    ! [A_22,B_23,C_24] : ( meet(meet(join(A_22,B_23),join(C_24,A_22)),A_22) = A_22 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_30]) ).

tff(c_143,plain,
    ! [A_10,B_23] : ( meet(meet(join(A_10,B_23),A_10),A_10) = A_10 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_10,c_109]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [A_1,B_2] : ( join(meet(A_1,B_2),meet(A_1,join(A_1,B_2))) = A_1 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_24]) ).

tff(c_182,plain,
    ! [A_27,B_28] : ( meet(meet(join(A_27,B_28),A_27),A_27) = A_27 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_10,c_109]) ).

tff(c_687,plain,
    ! [A_44,B_45] : ( meet(meet(A_44,meet(A_44,B_45)),meet(A_44,B_45)) = meet(A_44,B_45) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_182]) ).

tff(c_747,plain,
    ! [A_10,B_23] : ( meet(meet(meet(join(A_10,B_23),A_10),A_10),meet(meet(join(A_10,B_23),A_10),A_10)) = meet(meet(join(A_10,B_23),A_10),A_10) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_143,c_687]) ).

tff(c_770,plain,
    ! [A_10] : ( meet(A_10,A_10) = A_10 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_143,c_143,c_143,c_747]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    meet(a,a) != a,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_34]) ).

tff(c_782,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_770,c_12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : LAT088-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.17/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 12:45:06 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.30/1.87  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.30/1.87  
% 3.30/1.87  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.56/1.91  
% 3.56/1.91  Inference rules
% 3.56/1.91  ----------------------
% 3.56/1.91  #Ref     : 0
% 3.56/1.91  #Sup     : 211
% 3.56/1.91  #Fact    : 0
% 3.56/1.91  #Define  : 0
% 3.56/1.91  #Split   : 0
% 3.56/1.91  #Chain   : 0
% 3.56/1.91  #Close   : 0
% 3.56/1.91  
% 3.56/1.91  Ordering : KBO
% 3.56/1.91  
% 3.56/1.91  Simplification rules
% 3.56/1.91  ----------------------
% 3.56/1.91  #Subsume      : 0
% 3.56/1.91  #Demod        : 107
% 3.56/1.91  #Tautology    : 72
% 3.56/1.91  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.56/1.91  #BackRed      : 5
% 3.56/1.91  
% 3.56/1.91  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.56/1.91  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.56/1.91  
% 3.56/1.91  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.56/1.91  ----------------------
% 3.56/1.91  Preprocessing        : 0.40
% 3.56/1.91  Parsing              : 0.21
% 3.56/1.91  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.56/1.91  Main loop            : 0.42
% 3.56/1.91  Inferencing          : 0.16
% 3.56/1.91  Reduction            : 0.13
% 3.56/1.91  Demodulation         : 0.10
% 3.56/1.91  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.56/1.91  Subsumption          : 0.08
% 3.56/1.91  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 3.56/1.91  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.56/1.91  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.56/1.91  Total                : 0.88
% 3.56/1.91  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.56/1.91  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.56/1.91  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.56/1.91  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------