TSTP Solution File: LAT043-1 by Leo-III---1.7.7
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem : LAT043-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:26:44 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.87s 1.72s
% Output : Refutation 3.02s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 20
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 27 unt; 7 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 27 ( 26 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 124 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 122 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 5 ( 5 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 44 ( 0 ^; 44 !; 0 ?; 44 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(complement_type,type,
complement: $i > $i ).
thf(join_type,type,
join: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(c_type,type,
c: $i ).
thf(d_type,type,
d: $i ).
thf(meet_type,type,
meet: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(n1_type,type,
n1: $i ).
thf(n0_type,type,
n0: $i ).
thf(1,negated_conjecture,
( ( complement @ ( join @ c @ d ) )
!= ( meet @ ( complement @ c ) @ ( complement @ d ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_compatability_law) ).
thf(14,plain,
( ( complement @ ( join @ c @ d ) )
!= ( meet @ ( complement @ c ) @ ( complement @ d ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ ( meet @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( meet @ A @ ( meet @ B @ C ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_meet) ).
thf(29,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ ( meet @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( meet @ A @ ( meet @ B @ C ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(2,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ A )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_of_meet) ).
thf(17,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ A )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ B )
= ( join @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_join) ).
thf(27,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ B )
= ( join @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( complement @ ( complement @ A ) )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',invertability3) ).
thf(39,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( complement @ ( complement @ A ) )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( join @ ( complement @ A ) @ A )
= n1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',invertability1) ).
thf(35,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( join @ ( complement @ A ) @ A )
= n1 ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ ( join @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( join @ A @ ( join @ B @ C ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_join) ).
thf(31,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ ( join @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( join @ A @ ( join @ B @ C ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ ( meet @ A @ B ) )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',absorption2) ).
thf(23,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ ( meet @ A @ B ) )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ A )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_of_join) ).
thf(19,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ A )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( meet @ ( complement @ A ) @ A )
= n0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',invertability2) ).
thf(37,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( meet @ ( complement @ A ) @ A )
= n0 ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ B )
= ( meet @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_meet) ).
thf(25,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ B )
= ( meet @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ ( join @ A @ B ) )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',absorption1) ).
thf(21,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ ( join @ A @ B ) )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ ( join @ B @ C ) )
= ( join @ ( meet @ A @ B ) @ ( meet @ A @ C ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distributivity) ).
thf(33,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ ( join @ B @ C ) )
= ( join @ ( meet @ A @ B ) @ ( meet @ A @ C ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(43,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[14,29,17,27,39,35,31,23,19,37,25,21,33]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : LAT043-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.09/0.13 % Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 18 14:19:14 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.85/0.83 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.18/0.96 % [INFO] Parsing done (121ms).
% 1.18/0.97 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.62/1.21 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.62/1.21 % [INFO] cvc4 registered as external prover.
% 1.62/1.22 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.77/1.27 % [INFO] Found a conjecture and 12 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 1.77/1.29 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 12 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 1.77/1.30 % [INFO] Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF).
% 1.93/1.31 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 1.93/1.31 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 2.87/1.72 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 2.87/1.72 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 2.87/1.72 % Time passed: 1228ms (effective reasoning time: 753ms)
% 2.87/1.72 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 2.87/1.72 % Axioms used in derivation (12): commutativity_of_join, absorption1, commutativity_of_meet, invertability3, associativity_of_join, idempotence_of_meet, invertability2, distributivity, associativity_of_meet, invertability1, idempotence_of_join, absorption2
% 2.87/1.72 % No. of inferences in proof: 27
% 2.87/1.72 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1228 ms resp. 753 ms w/o parsing
% 3.02/1.79 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.02/1.79 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------