TSTP Solution File: LAT042-1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : LAT042-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:38:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.43s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
~ sPE(join(a,meet(b,join(a,c))),meet(join(a,b),join(a,c))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_modular_law)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
( ~ sPE(meet(join(a,b),join(a,c)),join(a,meet(b,join(a,c))))
| sPE(join(a,meet(b,join(a,c))),meet(join(a,b),join(a,c))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
sPE(meet(join(a,b),join(a,c)),meet(join(a,c),join(a,b))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_meet)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
sPE(meet(b,join(a,c)),meet(b,join(a,c))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
sPE(meet(join(a,c),b),meet(b,join(a,c))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_meet)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ sPE(meet(join(a,b),join(a,c)),meet(join(a,c),join(a,b)))
| ~ sPE(meet(join(a,c),join(a,b)),join(meet(join(a,c),a),meet(join(a,c),b)))
| sPE(meet(join(a,b),join(a,c)),join(meet(join(a,c),a),meet(join(a,c),b))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
sPE(meet(join(a,c),join(a,b)),join(meet(join(a,c),a),meet(join(a,c),b))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distributivity)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
sPE(meet(join(a,c),a),meet(a,join(a,c))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_meet)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
( ~ sPE(meet(join(a,b),join(a,c)),join(meet(a,join(a,c)),meet(b,join(a,c))))
| ~ sPE(join(meet(a,join(a,c)),meet(b,join(a,c))),join(a,meet(b,join(a,c))))
| sPE(meet(join(a,b),join(a,c)),join(a,meet(b,join(a,c)))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
( ~ sPE(meet(join(a,b),join(a,c)),join(meet(join(a,c),a),meet(join(a,c),b)))
| ~ sPE(join(meet(join(a,c),a),meet(join(a,c),b)),join(meet(a,join(a,c)),meet(b,join(a,c))))
| sPE(meet(join(a,b),join(a,c)),join(meet(a,join(a,c)),meet(b,join(a,c)))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
( ~ sPE(meet(join(a,c),a),meet(a,join(a,c)))
| ~ sPE(meet(join(a,c),b),meet(b,join(a,c)))
| sPE(join(meet(join(a,c),a),meet(join(a,c),b)),join(meet(a,join(a,c)),meet(b,join(a,c)))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g11,plain,
( ~ sPE(meet(a,join(a,c)),a)
| ~ sPE(meet(b,join(a,c)),meet(b,join(a,c)))
| sPE(join(meet(a,join(a,c)),meet(b,join(a,c))),join(a,meet(b,join(a,c)))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g12,plain,
sPE(meet(a,join(a,c)),a),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',absorption1)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : LAT042-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 28 19:23:16 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.43 % symbols: 10
% 0.19/0.43 % clauses: 19
% 0.19/0.43 % start clauses: 1
% 0.19/0.43 % iterative deepening steps: 771
% 0.19/0.43 % maximum path limit: 5
% 0.19/0.43 % literal attempts: 29497
% 0.19/0.43 % depth failures: 11685
% 0.19/0.43 % regularity failures: 3194
% 0.19/0.43 % tautology failures: 1518
% 0.19/0.43 % reductions: 0
% 0.19/0.43 % extensions: 28739
% 0.19/0.43 % SAT variables: 10669
% 0.19/0.43 % SAT clauses: 15077
% 0.19/0.43 % WalkSAT solutions: 15072
% 0.19/0.43 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.19/0.43 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.43 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------