TSTP Solution File: LAT042-1 by Otter---3.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Otter---3.3
% Problem : LAT042-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:01:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 2.10s 2.33s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : LAT042-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 08:29:51 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 1.74/1.94 ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.74/1.94 The process was started by sandbox2 on n027.cluster.edu,
% 1.74/1.94 Wed Jul 27 08:29:52 2022
% 1.74/1.94 The command was "./otter". The process ID is 16488.
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.74/1.94 set(auto).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.74/1.94 clear(print_given).
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 list(usable).
% 1.74/1.94 0 [] A=A.
% 1.74/1.94 0 [] meet(X,X)=X.
% 1.74/1.94 0 [] join(X,X)=X.
% 1.74/1.94 0 [] meet(X,join(X,Y))=X.
% 1.74/1.94 0 [] join(X,meet(X,Y))=X.
% 1.74/1.94 0 [] meet(X,Y)=meet(Y,X).
% 1.74/1.94 0 [] join(X,Y)=join(Y,X).
% 1.74/1.94 0 [] meet(meet(X,Y),Z)=meet(X,meet(Y,Z)).
% 1.74/1.94 0 [] join(join(X,Y),Z)=join(X,join(Y,Z)).
% 1.74/1.94 0 [] meet(X,join(Y,Z))=join(meet(X,Y),meet(X,Z)).
% 1.74/1.94 0 [] join(complement(X),X)=n1.
% 1.74/1.94 0 [] meet(complement(X),X)=n0.
% 1.74/1.94 0 [] complement(complement(X))=X.
% 1.74/1.94 0 [] join(a,meet(b,join(a,c)))!=meet(join(a,b),join(a,c)).
% 1.74/1.94 end_of_list.
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 1.74/1.94 strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.74/1.94 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 ------------> process usable:
% 1.74/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=15): 2 [copy,1,flip.1] meet(join(a,b),join(a,c))!=join(a,meet(b,join(a,c))).
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 ------------> process sos:
% 1.74/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 3 [] A=A.
% 1.74/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 4 [] meet(A,A)=A.
% 1.74/1.94 ---> New Demodulator: 5 [new_demod,4] meet(A,A)=A.
% 1.74/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 6 [] join(A,A)=A.
% 1.74/1.94 ---> New Demodulator: 7 [new_demod,6] join(A,A)=A.
% 1.74/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 8 [] meet(A,join(A,B))=A.
% 1.74/1.94 ---> New Demodulator: 9 [new_demod,8] meet(A,join(A,B))=A.
% 1.74/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 10 [] join(A,meet(A,B))=A.
% 1.74/1.94 ---> New Demodulator: 11 [new_demod,10] join(A,meet(A,B))=A.
% 1.74/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 12 [] meet(A,B)=meet(B,A).
% 1.74/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 13 [] join(A,B)=join(B,A).
% 1.74/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 14 [] meet(meet(A,B),C)=meet(A,meet(B,C)).
% 1.74/1.94 ---> New Demodulator: 15 [new_demod,14] meet(meet(A,B),C)=meet(A,meet(B,C)).
% 1.74/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 16 [] join(join(A,B),C)=join(A,join(B,C)).
% 1.74/1.94 ---> New Demodulator: 17 [new_demod,16] join(join(A,B),C)=join(A,join(B,C)).
% 1.74/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 18 [] meet(A,join(B,C))=join(meet(A,B),meet(A,C)).
% 1.74/1.94 ---> New Demodulator: 19 [new_demod,18] meet(A,join(B,C))=join(meet(A,B),meet(A,C)).
% 1.74/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 20 [] join(complement(A),A)=n1.
% 1.74/1.94 ---> New Demodulator: 21 [new_demod,20] join(complement(A),A)=n1.
% 1.74/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 22 [] meet(complement(A),A)=n0.
% 1.74/1.94 ---> New Demodulator: 23 [new_demod,22] meet(complement(A),A)=n0.
% 1.74/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 24 [] complement(complement(A))=A.
% 1.74/1.94 ---> New Demodulator: 25 [new_demod,24] complement(complement(A))=A.
% 1.74/1.94 Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [copy,3,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.74/1.94 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 5.
% 1.74/1.94 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 7.
% 1.74/1.94 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 9.
% 1.74/1.94 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 11.
% 1.74/1.94 Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [copy,12,flip.1] meet(A,B)=meet(B,A).
% 1.74/1.94 Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [copy,13,flip.1] join(A,B)=join(B,A).
% 1.74/1.94 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 15.
% 1.74/1.94 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 17.
% 1.74/1.94 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 19.
% 1.74/1.94 >> back demodulating 8 with 19.
% 1.74/1.94 >> back demodulating 2 with 19.
% 1.74/1.94 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 21.
% 1.74/1.94 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 23.
% 1.74/1.94 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 25.
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Resetting weight limit to 11.
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Resetting weight limit to 11.
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 sos_size=467
% 2.10/2.33
% 2.10/2.33
% 2.10/2.33 Resetting weight limit to 10.
% 2.10/2.33
% 2.10/2.33
% 2.10/2.33 Resetting weight limit to 10.
% 2.10/2.33
% 2.10/2.33 sos_size=282
% 2.10/2.33
% 2.10/2.33 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 2.10/2.33
% 2.10/2.33
% 2.10/2.33 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 2.10/2.33
% 2.10/2.33 ============ end of search ============
% 2.10/2.33
% 2.10/2.33 -------------- statistics -------------
% 2.10/2.33 clauses given 327
% 2.10/2.33 clauses generated 71379
% 2.10/2.33 clauses kept 728
% 2.10/2.33 clauses forward subsumed 34853
% 2.10/2.33 clauses back subsumed 0
% 2.10/2.33 Kbytes malloced 4882
% 2.10/2.33
% 2.10/2.33 ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 2.10/2.33 user CPU time 0.44 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.10/2.33 system CPU time 0.00 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.10/2.33 wall-clock time 1 (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 2.10/2.33
% 2.10/2.33 Process 16488 finished Wed Jul 27 08:29:53 2022
% 2.10/2.33 Otter interrupted
% 2.10/2.33 PROOF NOT FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------