TSTP Solution File: LAT038-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : LAT038-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:48:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : LAT038-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 15:39:03 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.13/0.37 #
% 0.13/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.37 # Number of axioms: 17 Number of unprocessed: 17
% 0.13/0.37 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.37 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.37 # Hello from C++
% 0.13/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.13/0.38 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.13/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.13/0.38 # 17 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.13/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.13/0.38 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.13/0.38 # Found 17 unit axioms.
% 0.13/0.38 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.13/0.38 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.13/0.38 # 17 unit axiom clauses
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.13/0.38 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.13/0.38 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.13/0.38 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.13/0.38 # Returning from population with 25 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.13/0.38 # We now have 25 tableaux to operate on
% 0.20/0.57 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.57 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.20/0.57 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.57 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.20/0.57 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.20/0.57 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.20/0.57 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.20/0.57 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.20/0.57 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.57 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.57 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.57
% 0.20/0.57 # End clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.57 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (f(X1,n0)=n0)).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (f(n0,X1)=n0)).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (meet(X1,X1)=X1)).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (join(X1,X1)=X1)).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (meet(X1,join(X1,X2))=X1)).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (join(X1,meet(X1,X2))=X1)).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (meet(meet(X1,X2),X3)=meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)))).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (join(join(X1,X2),X3)=join(X1,join(X2,X3)))).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_32, hypothesis, (f(join(bb,aa),dd)=f(join(bb,cc),dd))).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_33, hypothesis, (meet(f(bb,dd),f(aa,dd))=meet(f(bb,dd),f(cc,dd)))).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (join(f(X1,X2),f(X1,X3))=f(X1,join(X2,X3)))).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (join(f(X1,X2),f(X3,X2))=f(join(X1,X3),X2))).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_27, hypothesis, (join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X1,X3))=meet(X1,join(X2,X3)))).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_26, hypothesis, (meet(join(X1,X2),join(X1,X3))=join(X1,meet(X2,X3)))).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (meet(X1,X2)=meet(X2,X1))).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (join(X1,X2)=join(X2,X1))).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_34, negated_conjecture, (f(aa,dd)!=f(cc,dd))).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.20/0.57 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.20/0.57 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.20/0.57 # Found 6 steps
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (f(X9,n0)=n0), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (f(X9,n0)=n0), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_39])).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_66, plain, (f(X9,n0)!=n0), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_31])).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_65, plain, (n0=n0), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_40])).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_136, plain, (f(X1,n0)!=n0), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_31])).
% 0.20/0.57 cnf(i_0_134, plain, (meet(n0,f(X1,n0))=meet(n0,n0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_134, ...])).
% 0.20/0.57 # End printing tableau
% 0.20/0.57 # SZS output end
% 0.20/0.57 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.20/0.57 # Child (20693) has found a proof.
% 0.20/0.57
% 0.20/0.57 # Proof search is over...
% 0.20/0.57 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------