TSTP Solution File: LAT035-1 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : LAT035-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:31:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (  13 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   20 (   9   ~;   9   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   4   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f215,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f29,f32,f214]) ).

fof(f214,plain,
    spl0_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f213]) ).

fof(f213,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl0_1 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f212]) ).

fof(f212,plain,
    ( f(k(join(aa,bb))) != f(k(join(aa,bb)))
    | spl0_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f103,f14]) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] : k(join(X3,X4)) = meet(k(X3),k(X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_on_join) ).

fof(f103,plain,
    ( f(k(join(aa,bb))) != f(meet(k(aa),k(bb)))
    | spl0_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f24,f18]) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] : f(meet(X3,X4)) = join(f(X3),f(X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f_on_meet) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ( f(k(join(aa,bb))) != join(f(k(aa)),f(k(bb)))
    | spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> f(k(join(aa,bb))) = join(f(k(aa)),f(k(bb))) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    spl0_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f31]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f19,f30]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ( n0 != f(n1)
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f28,f16]) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    n1 = k(n0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_on_bottom) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ( n0 != f(k(n0))
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> n0 = f(k(n0)) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).

fof(f19,axiom,
    n0 = f(n1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f_on_top) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f20,f26,f22]) ).

fof(f20,axiom,
    ( n0 != f(k(n0))
    | f(k(join(aa,bb))) != join(f(k(aa)),f(k(bb))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',comp_join_hemimorphism) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11  % Problem    : LAT035-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.02/0.11  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.32  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 00:40:02 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.43  % (24676)lrs+1_1:1_aac=none:add=large:anc=all_dependent:cond=fast:ep=RST:fsr=off:lma=on:nm=2:sos=on:sp=reverse_arity:stl=30:uhcvi=on:urr=on:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.43  % (24684)dis+10_1:1_add=large:alpa=false:anc=none:fd=off:lcm=reverse:nwc=5.0:sd=2:sgt=20:ss=included:i=46:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/46Mi)
% 0.15/0.44  % (24684)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.44  % (24676)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.44  % (24676)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44  % (24676)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.15/0.44  % (24676)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.15/0.44  % (24676)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.44  % (24676)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.44  
% 0.15/0.44  % (24676)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.15/0.44  % (24676)Time elapsed: 0.055 s
% 0.15/0.44  % (24676)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.44  % (24676)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44  % (24676)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44  % (24684)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.44  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.44  % (24684)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44  % (24684)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.15/0.44  % (24684)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.15/0.44  % (24684)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.44  
% 0.15/0.44  % (24684)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.15/0.44  % (24684)Time elapsed: 0.062 s
% 0.15/0.44  % (24684)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.15/0.44  % (24684)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44  % (24684)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44  % (24659)Success in time 0.115 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------