TSTP Solution File: LAT035-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : LAT035-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:41:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.42s 0.58s
% Output   : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    9 (   8 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(k_on_join,axiom,
    k(join(X,Y)) = meet(k(X),k(Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_on_join) ).

cnf(k_on_bottom,axiom,
    k(n0) = n1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_on_bottom) ).

cnf(f_on_meet,axiom,
    f(meet(X,Y)) = join(f(X),f(Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f_on_meet) ).

cnf(f_on_top,axiom,
    f(n1) = n0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f_on_top) ).

cnf(comp_join_hemimorphism,negated_conjecture,
    ( f(k(join(aa,bb))) != join(f(k(aa)),f(k(bb)))
    | f(k(n0)) != n0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',comp_join_hemimorphism) ).

cnf(24,plain,
    f(k(join(aa,bb))) != join(f(k(aa)),f(k(bb))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[comp_join_hemimorphism,f_on_top,k_on_bottom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(83,plain,
    f(k(join(X,Y))) = join(f(k(X)),f(k(Y))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[f_on_meet,k_on_join,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(85,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[24,83,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : LAT035-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 20:14:48 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  "."
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-29T20:14:48
% 0.19/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n026.cluster.edu at 2022-06-29T20:14:48
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|meet| ?X ?Y) (|meet| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.19/0.47  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|join| ?X ?Y) (|join| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.19/0.47  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|meet| (|meet| ?X ?Y) ?Z) (|meet| ?X (|meet| ?Y ?Z))).
% 0.19/0.47  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|join| (|join| ?X ?Y) ?Z) (|join| ?X (|join| ?Y ?Z))).
% 0.19/0.47  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|join| ?X |n0|) ?X).
% 0.19/0.47  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|meet| ?X |n1|) ?X).
% 0.19/0.47  ; Declaring meet to be commutative.
% 0.19/0.47  ; Declaring meet to be associative-commutative.
% 0.19/0.47  ; Declaring join to be commutative.
% 0.42/0.58  ; Declaring join to be associative-commutative.
% 0.42/0.58  
% 0.42/0.58  #||
% 0.42/0.58  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.42/0.58  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.42/0.58  ||#
% 0.42/0.58  
% 0.42/0.58  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.42/0.58  ;       730 formulas have been input or derived (from 22 formulas).
% 0.42/0.58  ;        85 (12%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.42/0.58  ;            2 ( 2%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.42/0.58  ;           83 (98%) are still being kept.
% 0.42/0.58  ; 
% 0.42/0.58  ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.42/0.58  ;     0.004   3%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (20 calls)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     0.012  10%   Process new row              (649 calls)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     0.002   2%   Resolution                   (42 calls)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     0.018  15%   Paramodulation               (21 calls)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     0.004   3%   Embedding                    (41 calls)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (1 call)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (1 call)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (1 call)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     0.051  42%   Forward simplification       (612 calls)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     0.001   1%   Backward simplification      (47 calls)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     0.004   3%   Ordering                     (325 calls)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering ac                  (143 calls)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     0.026  21%   Other
% 0.42/0.58  ;     0.122        Total
% 0.42/0.58  ;     0.123        Real time
% 0.42/0.58  ; 
% 0.42/0.58  ; Term-hash-array has 265 terms in all.
% 0.42/0.58  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 entry (1 at peak, 1 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.42/0.58  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 10 nodes (10 at peak, 10 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.42/0.58  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1 call.
% 0.42/0.58  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1 call.
% 0.42/0.58  ; Path-index has 260 entries (266 at peak, 271 added, 11 deleted).
% 0.42/0.58  ; Path-index has 171 nodes (183 at peak, 189 added, 18 deleted).
% 0.42/0.58  ; Trie-index has 260 entries (266 at peak, 271 added, 11 deleted).
% 0.42/0.58  ; Trie-index has 64 nodes (68 at peak, 70 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.42/0.58  ; Retrieved 21,732 generalization terms in 3,818 calls.
% 0.42/0.58  ; Retrieved 184 instance terms in 47 calls.
% 0.42/0.58  ; Retrieved 476 unifiable terms in 97 calls.
% 0.42/0.58  ; 
% 0.42/0.58  ; The agenda of rows to process has 62 entries:
% 0.42/0.58  ;     9 with value 19              5 with value 24               2 with value 29
% 0.42/0.58  ;     8 with value 20              1 with value 25               2 with value 31
% 0.42/0.58  ;     7 with value 21             11 with value 27               1 with value 33
% 0.42/0.58  ;    16 with value 23
% 0.42/0.58  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 1 entry:
% 0.42/0.58  ;     1 with value 21
% 0.42/0.58  ; The agenda of rows to give has 60 entries:
% 0.42/0.58  ;     2 with value (4 12)          4 with value (4 21)           4 with value (4 27)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     4 with value (4 15)          6 with value (4 22)           4 with value (4 30)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     6 with value (4 18)          8 with value (4 24)           4 with value (4 31)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     2 with value (4 19)          4 with value (4 25)           4 with value (4 33)
% 0.42/0.58  ;     6 with value (4 20)          2 with value (4 26)
% 0.42/0.58  Evaluation took:
% 0.42/0.58    0.124 seconds of real time
% 0.42/0.58    0.110169 seconds of user run time
% 0.42/0.58    0.013236 seconds of system run time
% 0.42/0.58    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.42/0.58    0 page faults and
% 0.42/0.58    6,757,032 bytes consed.
% 0.42/0.58  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.42/0.58  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-29T20:14:48
% 0.42/0.58  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.42/0.58  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------