TSTP Solution File: LAT033-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : LAT033-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:57:14 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.52s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LAT033-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 06:27:42 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.52/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.60 % Transform :cnf
% 0.52/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.52/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.52/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.52/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60 % File : LAT033-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.5.0.
% 0.52/0.60 % Domain : Lattice Theory
% 0.52/0.60 % Problem : Idempotency of join
% 0.52/0.60 % Version : [McC88] (equality) axioms.
% 0.52/0.60 % English :
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 % Refs : [DeN00] DeNivelle (2000), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.52/0.60 % [McC88] McCune (1988), Challenge Equality Problems in Lattice
% 0.52/0.60 % Source : [DeN00]
% 0.52/0.60 % Names : idemp_of_join [DeN00]
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.52/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.04 v7.3.0, 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.06 v6.2.0, 0.07 v6.1.0, 0.00 v2.5.0
% 0.52/0.60 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 1 RR)
% 0.52/0.60 % Number of literals : 7 ( 7 equ; 1 neg)
% 0.52/0.60 % Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.52/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.52/0.60 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 0 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.52/0.60 % Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.52/0.60 % Number of variables : 14 ( 2 sgn)
% 0.52/0.60 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_PEQ_UEQ
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 % Comments :
% 0.52/0.60 % Bugfixes : v2.5.0 - Used axioms without the conjecture
% 0.52/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60 %----Include lattice theory axioms
% 0.52/0.60 %include('Axioms/LAT001-0.ax').
% 0.52/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60 cnf(absorption1,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 meet(X,join(X,Y)) = X ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 cnf(absorption2,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 join(X,meet(X,Y)) = X ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 cnf(commutativity_of_meet,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 meet(X,Y) = meet(Y,X) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 cnf(commutativity_of_join,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 join(X,Y) = join(Y,X) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 cnf(associativity_of_meet,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 meet(meet(X,Y),Z) = meet(X,meet(Y,Z)) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 cnf(associativity_of_join,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 join(join(X,Y),Z) = join(X,join(Y,Z)) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 cnf(idempotence_of_join,negated_conjecture,
% 0.52/0.61 join(xx,xx) != xx ).
% 0.52/0.61
% 0.52/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.52/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.52/0.61 %ClaNum:14(EqnAxiom:7)
% 0.52/0.61 %VarNum:28(SingletonVarNum:14)
% 0.52/0.61 %MaxLitNum:1
% 0.52/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.52/0.61 %SharedTerms:3
% 0.52/0.61 %goalClause: 14
% 0.52/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.52/0.61 [14]~E(f1(a3,a3),a3)
% 0.52/0.61 [8]E(f1(x81,x82),f1(x82,x81))
% 0.52/0.61 [9]E(f2(x91,x92),f2(x92,x91))
% 0.52/0.61 [10]E(f1(x101,f2(x101,x102)),x101)
% 0.52/0.61 [11]E(f2(x111,f1(x111,x112)),x111)
% 0.52/0.61 [12]E(f1(f1(x121,x122),x123),f1(x121,f1(x122,x123)))
% 0.52/0.61 [13]E(f2(f2(x131,x132),x133),f2(x131,f2(x132,x133)))
% 0.52/0.61 %EqnAxiom
% 0.52/0.61 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.52/0.61 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.52/0.61 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.52/0.61 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f1(x41,x43),f1(x42,x43))
% 0.52/0.61 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f1(x53,x51),f1(x53,x52))
% 0.52/0.61 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f2(x61,x63),f2(x62,x63))
% 0.52/0.61 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f2(x73,x71),f2(x73,x72))
% 0.52/0.61
% 0.52/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.61 cnf(16,plain,
% 0.52/0.61 (~E(f1(a3,a3),f1(a3,f2(a3,x161)))),
% 0.52/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[14,10,2,3])).
% 0.52/0.61 cnf(22,plain,
% 0.52/0.61 (~E(a3,f2(a3,x221))),
% 0.52/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[16,5])).
% 0.52/0.61 cnf(34,plain,
% 0.52/0.61 ($false),
% 0.52/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,22,2]),
% 0.52/0.61 ['proof']).
% 0.52/0.61 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.52/0.61 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------