TSTP Solution File: LAT014-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : LAT014-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:35:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.61s 0.57s
% Output   : Refutation 1.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    6 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    6 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f75,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f68]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    a != a,
    inference(superposition,[],[f5,f37]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ! [X11,X12] : meet(X11,join(X11,X12)) = X11,
    inference(superposition,[],[f2,f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : join(join(meet(X0,X1),meet(X1,X2)),X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mckenzie3) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : meet(X0,join(X1,join(X0,X2))) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mckenzie2) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    a != meet(a,join(a,b)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_absorbtion) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : LAT014-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 00:43:33 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 1.47/0.55  % (10341)ott+10_7:2_awrs=decay:awrsf=8:bd=preordered:drc=off:fd=preordered:fde=unused:fsr=off:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsqr=5,8:sp=const_min:spb=units:to=lpo:i=355:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/355Mi)
% 1.47/0.55  % (10318)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 1.47/0.55  TRYING [1]
% 1.47/0.55  % (10332)ott+10_1:8_bsd=on:fsd=on:lcm=predicate:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=1.5:spb=goal_then_units:i=176:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/176Mi)
% 1.47/0.55  TRYING [2]
% 1.47/0.55  TRYING [3]
% 1.47/0.55  % (10332)First to succeed.
% 1.47/0.55  TRYING [4]
% 1.47/0.56  % (10340)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=439:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/439Mi)
% 1.47/0.56  % (10331)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:rp=on:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 1.47/0.56  % (10317)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/48Mi)
% 1.47/0.56  % (10315)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 1.47/0.56  % (10316)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 1.47/0.56  % (10335)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 1.47/0.56  % (10326)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 1.61/0.56  % (10327)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 1.61/0.56  % (10315)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.61/0.56  % (10323)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 1.61/0.56  % (10319)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 1.61/0.56  % (10324)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 1.61/0.57  % (10333)ott+3_1:1_gsp=on:lcm=predicate:i=138:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/138Mi)
% 1.61/0.57  TRYING [5]
% 1.61/0.57  % (10329)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:i=59:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/59Mi)
% 1.61/0.57  % (10332)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.61/0.57  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 1.61/0.57  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 1.61/0.57  % (10332)------------------------------
% 1.61/0.57  % (10332)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.61/0.57  % (10332)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.61/0.57  % (10332)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.61/0.57  
% 1.61/0.57  % (10332)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.61/0.57  % (10332)Time elapsed: 0.144 s
% 1.61/0.57  % (10332)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 1.61/0.57  % (10332)------------------------------
% 1.61/0.57  % (10332)------------------------------
% 1.61/0.57  % (10311)Success in time 0.21 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------