TSTP Solution File: LAT011-1 by Leo-III---1.7.7
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem : LAT011-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:26:39 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.77s 1.68s
% Output : Refutation 3.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 19
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 29 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 29 ( 28 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 126 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 124 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 6 ( 6 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 52 ( 0 ^; 52 !; 0 ?; 52 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(meet_type,type,
meet: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(a_type,type,
a: $i ).
thf(b_type,type,
b: $i ).
thf(meet2_type,type,
meet2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(join_type,type,
join: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ A )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_of_join) ).
thf(20,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ A )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ ( join @ A @ B ) )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',absorption1) ).
thf(22,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ ( join @ A @ B ) )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(2,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ A )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_of_meet) ).
thf(18,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ A )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(1,negated_conjecture,
( ( meet @ a @ b )
!= ( meet2 @ a @ b ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_meets_are_same) ).
thf(15,plain,
( ( meet @ a @ b )
!= ( meet2 @ a @ b ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
thf(14,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet2 @ ( meet2 @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( meet2 @ A @ ( meet2 @ B @ C ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_meet2) ).
thf(42,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet2 @ ( meet2 @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( meet2 @ A @ ( meet2 @ B @ C ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ ( meet @ A @ B ) )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',absorption2) ).
thf(24,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ ( meet @ A @ B ) )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ B )
= ( join @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_join) ).
thf(28,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ B )
= ( join @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet2 @ A @ ( join @ A @ B ) )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',absorption1_2) ).
thf(38,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet2 @ A @ ( join @ A @ B ) )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ ( join @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( join @ A @ ( join @ B @ C ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_join) ).
thf(32,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ ( join @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( join @ A @ ( join @ B @ C ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( meet2 @ A @ A )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_of_meet2) ).
thf(34,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( meet2 @ A @ A )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ ( meet2 @ A @ B ) )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',absorption2_2) ).
thf(40,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ ( meet2 @ A @ B ) )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ B )
= ( meet @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_meet) ).
thf(26,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ B )
= ( meet @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet2 @ A @ B )
= ( meet2 @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_meet2) ).
thf(36,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet2 @ A @ B )
= ( meet2 @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ ( meet @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( meet @ A @ ( meet @ B @ C ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_meet) ).
thf(30,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ ( meet @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( meet @ A @ ( meet @ B @ C ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(55,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[20,22,18,15,42,24,28,38,32,34,40,26,36,30]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : LAT011-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.12/0.16 % Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.17/0.37 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.37 % DateTime : Thu May 18 13:49:53 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.96/0.88 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.14/1.00 % [INFO] Parsing done (120ms).
% 1.14/1.01 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.77/1.21 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.77/1.21 % [INFO] cvc4 registered as external prover.
% 1.77/1.21 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.85/1.26 % [INFO] Found a conjecture and 13 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 1.85/1.28 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 13 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 1.85/1.29 % [INFO] Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF).
% 1.85/1.30 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 1.85/1.30 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 2.77/1.68 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 2.77/1.68 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 2.77/1.68 % Time passed: 1142ms (effective reasoning time: 669ms)
% 2.77/1.68 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 2.77/1.68 % Axioms used in derivation (13): commutativity_of_join, absorption1, associativity_of_meet, absorption2_2, absorption1_2, commutativity_of_meet, idempotence_of_meet2, associativity_of_join, idempotence_of_meet, associativity_of_meet2, commutativity_of_meet2, idempotence_of_join, absorption2
% 2.77/1.68 % No. of inferences in proof: 29
% 2.77/1.68 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1142 ms resp. 669 ms w/o parsing
% 3.17/1.76 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.17/1.76 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------