TSTP Solution File: LAT009-1 by Leo-III---1.7.7
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem : LAT009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:26:39 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 74.80s 13.16s
% Output : Refutation 74.80s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 15
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 21 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 21 ( 20 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 134 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 132 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 4 ( 4 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 38 ( 0 ^; 38 !; 0 ?; 38 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(join_type,type,
join: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(a_type,type,
a: $i ).
thf(meet_type,type,
meet: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(b_type,type,
b: $i ).
thf(c_type,type,
c: $i ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ B )
= ( join @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_join) ).
thf(24,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ B )
= ( join @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(2,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ A )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_of_meet) ).
thf(14,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ A )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ ( meet @ A @ B ) )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',absorption2) ).
thf(20,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ ( meet @ A @ B ) )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ ( join @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( join @ A @ ( join @ B @ C ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_join) ).
thf(28,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ ( join @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( join @ A @ ( join @ B @ C ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ B )
= ( meet @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_meet) ).
thf(22,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ B )
= ( meet @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ ( join @ A @ B ) )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',absorption1) ).
thf(18,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ A @ ( join @ A @ B ) )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ A )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_of_join) ).
thf(16,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( join @ A @ A )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(1,negated_conjecture,
( ( join @ a @ ( meet @ b @ c ) )
!= ( meet @ ( join @ a @ b ) @ ( join @ a @ c ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_distributivity) ).
thf(11,plain,
( ( join @ a @ ( meet @ b @ c ) )
!= ( meet @ ( join @ a @ b ) @ ( join @ a @ c ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ ( meet @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( meet @ A @ ( meet @ B @ C ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_meet) ).
thf(26,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( meet @ ( meet @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( meet @ A @ ( meet @ B @ C ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ ( meet @ ( join @ ( meet @ A @ B ) @ C ) @ B ) @ ( meet @ C @ A ) )
= ( meet @ ( join @ ( meet @ ( join @ A @ B ) @ C ) @ B ) @ ( join @ C @ A ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distributivity_dual) ).
thf(30,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( join @ ( meet @ ( join @ ( meet @ A @ B ) @ C ) @ B ) @ ( meet @ C @ A ) )
= ( meet @ ( join @ ( meet @ ( join @ A @ B ) @ C ) @ B ) @ ( join @ C @ A ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(44234,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[24,14,20,28,22,18,16,11,26,30]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : LAT009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.15 % Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.16/0.37 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % DateTime : Thu May 18 14:23:48 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 1.05/0.92 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.26/1.05 % [INFO] Parsing done (133ms).
% 1.26/1.06 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.72/1.27 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.72/1.27 % [INFO] cvc4 registered as external prover.
% 1.72/1.28 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.98/1.33 % [INFO] Found a conjecture and 9 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 1.98/1.35 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 9 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 1.98/1.36 % [INFO] Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF).
% 1.98/1.36 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 1.98/1.36 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 74.80/13.16 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 74.80/13.16 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 74.80/13.16 % Time passed: 12634ms (effective reasoning time: 12097ms)
% 74.80/13.16 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 74.80/13.16 % Axioms used in derivation (9): commutativity_of_join, absorption1, associativity_of_meet, commutativity_of_meet, associativity_of_join, idempotence_of_join, absorption2, distributivity_dual, idempotence_of_meet
% 74.80/13.16 % No. of inferences in proof: 21
% 74.80/13.16 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 12634 ms resp. 12097 ms w/o parsing
% 74.80/13.18 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 74.80/13.18 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------