TSTP Solution File: LAT005-4 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : LAT005-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:07:20 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   69 (  67 unt;   0 nHn;  27 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   71 (  70 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   88 (  14 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(absorption1,axiom,
    meet(X1,join(X1,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Ts0RMuVyH/E---3.1_11387.p',absorption1) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_join,axiom,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Ts0RMuVyH/E---3.1_11387.p',commutativity_of_join) ).

cnf(modular,axiom,
    ( meet(X2,join(X1,X3)) = join(X1,meet(X3,X2))
    | meet(X1,X2) != X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Ts0RMuVyH/E---3.1_11387.p',modular) ).

cnf(absorption2,axiom,
    join(X1,meet(X1,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Ts0RMuVyH/E---3.1_11387.p',absorption2) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_meet,axiom,
    meet(X1,X2) = meet(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Ts0RMuVyH/E---3.1_11387.p',commutativity_of_meet) ).

cnf(x_meet_0,axiom,
    meet(X1,n0) = n0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Ts0RMuVyH/E---3.1_11387.p',x_meet_0) ).

cnf(associativity_of_join,axiom,
    join(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(X1,join(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Ts0RMuVyH/E---3.1_11387.p',associativity_of_join) ).

cnf(associativity_of_meet,axiom,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),X3) = meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Ts0RMuVyH/E---3.1_11387.p',associativity_of_meet) ).

cnf(r1_complement_join_a_b_2,negated_conjecture,
    meet(r1,join(a,b)) = n0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Ts0RMuVyH/E---3.1_11387.p',r1_complement_join_a_b_2) ).

cnf(define_a2,negated_conjecture,
    join(r1,meet(b,r2)) = a2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Ts0RMuVyH/E---3.1_11387.p',define_a2) ).

cnf(x_join_0,axiom,
    join(X1,n0) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Ts0RMuVyH/E---3.1_11387.p',x_join_0) ).

cnf(define_b2,negated_conjecture,
    join(r1,meet(a,r2)) = b2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Ts0RMuVyH/E---3.1_11387.p',define_b2) ).

cnf(r2_complement_meet_a_b_2,negated_conjecture,
    meet(r2,meet(a,b)) = n0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Ts0RMuVyH/E---3.1_11387.p',r2_complement_meet_a_b_2) ).

cnf(prove_SAMs_lemma,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a2,b2) != r1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Ts0RMuVyH/E---3.1_11387.p',prove_SAMs_lemma) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    meet(X1,join(X1,X2)) = X1,
    absorption1 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    commutativity_of_join ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    ( meet(X2,join(X1,X3)) = join(X1,meet(X3,X2))
    | meet(X1,X2) != X1 ),
    modular ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    meet(X1,join(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    join(X1,meet(X1,X2)) = X1,
    absorption2 ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    meet(X1,X2) = meet(X2,X1),
    commutativity_of_meet ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    join(X1,meet(X2,join(X3,X1))) = meet(join(X3,X1),join(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    meet(X1,n0) = n0,
    x_meet_0 ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    join(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(X1,join(X2,X3)),
    associativity_of_join ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    join(X1,meet(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X3,X1)) = meet(X1,join(meet(X1,X2),X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),X3) = meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)),
    associativity_of_meet ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    meet(r1,join(a,b)) = n0,
    r1_complement_join_a_b_2 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    meet(n0,X1) = n0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    join(X1,join(meet(X1,X2),X3)) = join(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,X1)) = join(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_14]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X3,X2)) = meet(X2,join(meet(X1,X2),X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,X3)) = meet(X2,join(meet(X2,X3),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    meet(r1,meet(join(a,b),X1)) = n0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,meet(X1,X3))) = join(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    join(r1,meet(b,r2)) = a2,
    define_a2 ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    meet(X1,join(meet(X1,X2),X3)) = meet(X1,join(meet(X3,X1),X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_19]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    meet(r1,meet(X1,join(a,b))) = n0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,axiom,
    join(X1,n0) = X1,
    x_join_0 ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    join(b,a2) = join(b,r1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    meet(X1,join(meet(X1,X2),X3)) = meet(X1,join(X2,meet(X3,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    meet(b,r1) = n0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_17]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    join(n0,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)) = meet(X2,meet(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_19]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a2,join(b,r1)) = a2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    meet(X1,meet(join(X1,X2),X3)) = meet(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    meet(join(a,b),join(b,r1)) = b,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_26]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    meet(b,join(r1,meet(X1,b))) = meet(b,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    join(r1,meet(a,r2)) = b2,
    define_b2 ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a2,meet(X1,join(b,r1))) = meet(X1,a2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,join(b,r1)) = meet(a,b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)) = meet(X3,meet(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    meet(b,join(r1,meet(b,X1))) = meet(b,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    meet(b,meet(r2,a2)) = meet(b,r2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_34]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    meet(X1,meet(X2,X1)) = meet(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    meet(r2,meet(a,b)) = n0,
    r2_complement_meet_a_b_2 ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    join(a,b2) = join(a,r1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    meet(r1,a2) = r1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,meet(b,a2)) = meet(a,a2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]),c_0_50]),c_0_19]),c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    meet(b,a2) = meet(b,r2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,meet(b,r2)) = n0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]),c_0_21]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    meet(b2,join(a,r1)) = b2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    join(r1,meet(X1,a2)) = meet(a2,join(r1,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_56]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,a2) = n0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]),c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a2,b2) != r1,
    prove_SAMs_lemma ).

cnf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
    meet(b2,meet(X1,join(a,r1))) = meet(X1,b2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a2,join(a,r1)) = r1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]),c_0_37]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
    meet(r1,b2) = r1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
    meet(b2,a2) != r1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]),c_0_19]),c_0_66]),c_0_19]),c_0_67]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13  % Problem    : LAT005-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.11/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 10:42:29 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6Ts0RMuVyH/E---3.1_11387.p
% 0.20/0.68  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.68  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.68  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.68  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.68  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.68  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.68  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.68  # sh5l with pid 11473 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.68  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/0.68  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.68  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.68  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.68  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.68  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.68  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.68  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.68  # Search class: FHUPM-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.68  # partial match(2): FHUSM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.68  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.68  # Starting G----_Y1346__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.68  # G----_Y1346__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with pid 11480 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.68  # Result found by G----_Y1346__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.20/0.68  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.68  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.68  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.68  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.68  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.68  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.68  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.68  # Search class: FHUPM-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.68  # partial match(2): FHUSM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.68  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.68  # Starting G----_Y1346__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.68  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.68  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.68  
% 0.20/0.68  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.68  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.68  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.68  # Parsed axioms                        : 20
% 0.20/0.68  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.68  # Initial clauses                      : 20
% 0.20/0.68  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.68  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 20
% 0.20/0.68  # Processed clauses                    : 2186
% 0.20/0.68  # ...of these trivial                  : 1047
% 0.20/0.68  # ...subsumed                          : 633
% 0.20/0.68  # ...remaining for further processing  : 506
% 0.20/0.68  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.68  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.68  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.20/0.68  # Backward-rewritten                   : 122
% 0.20/0.68  # Generated clauses                    : 30654
% 0.20/0.68  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14249
% 0.20/0.68  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.68  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.68  # Paramodulations                      : 30654
% 0.20/0.68  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.68  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.68  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.68  # Total rewrite steps                  : 52195
% 0.20/0.68  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.68  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.68  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.68  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.68  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.68  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.68  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.68  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.68  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.68  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.68  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.68  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.68  # Current number of processed clauses  : 363
% 0.20/0.68  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 339
% 0.20/0.68  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 6
% 0.20/0.68  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.20/0.68  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 17
% 0.20/0.68  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11865
% 0.20/0.68  # ...number of literals in the above   : 12596
% 0.20/0.68  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.68  # Current number of archived clauses   : 143
% 0.20/0.68  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 90
% 0.20/0.68  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 90
% 0.20/0.68  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 18
% 0.20/0.68  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 117
% 0.20/0.68  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.68  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1281
% 0.20/0.68  # BW rewrite match successes           : 616
% 0.20/0.68  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.68  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.68  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 324358
% 0.20/0.68  
% 0.20/0.68  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.68  # User time                : 0.169 s
% 0.20/0.68  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.20/0.68  # Total time               : 0.181 s
% 0.20/0.68  # Maximum resident set size: 1656 pages
% 0.20/0.68  
% 0.20/0.68  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.68  # User time                : 0.171 s
% 0.20/0.68  # System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.20/0.68  # Total time               : 0.184 s
% 0.20/0.68  # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.20/0.68  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.68  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------