TSTP Solution File: LAT005-4 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : LAT005-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:59:06 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 1.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   24
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   79 (  67 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   71 (  70 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    7 (   5   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   2   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   88 (  14 sgn;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    meet: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    join: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    n0: $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    n1: $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    r2: $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    r1: $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    b2: $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    a2: $i ).

cnf(absorption1,axiom,
    meet(X1,join(X1,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',absorption1) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_join,axiom,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_join) ).

cnf(modular,axiom,
    ( meet(X2,join(X1,X3)) = join(X1,meet(X3,X2))
    | meet(X1,X2) != X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-1.ax',modular) ).

cnf(absorption2,axiom,
    join(X1,meet(X1,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',absorption2) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_meet,axiom,
    meet(X1,X2) = meet(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',commutativity_of_meet) ).

cnf(x_meet_0,axiom,
    meet(X1,n0) = n0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-1.ax',x_meet_0) ).

cnf(associativity_of_join,axiom,
    join(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(X1,join(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',associativity_of_join) ).

cnf(associativity_of_meet,axiom,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),X3) = meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-0.ax',associativity_of_meet) ).

cnf(r1_complement_join_a_b_2,negated_conjecture,
    meet(r1,join(a,b)) = n0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r1_complement_join_a_b_2) ).

cnf(define_a2,negated_conjecture,
    join(r1,meet(b,r2)) = a2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',define_a2) ).

cnf(x_join_0,axiom,
    join(X1,n0) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT001-1.ax',x_join_0) ).

cnf(define_b2,negated_conjecture,
    join(r1,meet(a,r2)) = b2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',define_b2) ).

cnf(r2_complement_meet_a_b_2,negated_conjecture,
    meet(r2,meet(a,b)) = n0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r2_complement_meet_a_b_2) ).

cnf(prove_SAMs_lemma,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a2,b2) != r1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_SAMs_lemma) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    meet(X1,join(X1,X2)) = X1,
    absorption1 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    join(X1,X2) = join(X2,X1),
    commutativity_of_join ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    ( meet(X2,join(X1,X3)) = join(X1,meet(X3,X2))
    | meet(X1,X2) != X1 ),
    modular ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    meet(X1,join(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    join(X1,meet(X1,X2)) = X1,
    absorption2 ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    meet(X1,X2) = meet(X2,X1),
    commutativity_of_meet ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    join(X1,meet(X2,join(X3,X1))) = meet(join(X3,X1),join(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    meet(X1,n0) = n0,
    x_meet_0 ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    join(join(X1,X2),X3) = join(X1,join(X2,X3)),
    associativity_of_join ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    join(X1,meet(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X3,X1)) = meet(X1,join(meet(X1,X2),X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    meet(meet(X1,X2),X3) = meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)),
    associativity_of_meet ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    meet(r1,join(a,b)) = n0,
    r1_complement_join_a_b_2 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    meet(n0,X1) = n0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    join(X1,join(meet(X1,X2),X3)) = join(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,X1)) = join(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_14]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X3,X2)) = meet(X2,join(meet(X1,X2),X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,X3)) = meet(X2,join(meet(X2,X3),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    meet(r1,meet(join(a,b),X1)) = n0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    join(X1,join(X2,meet(X1,X3))) = join(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    join(r1,meet(b,r2)) = a2,
    define_a2 ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    meet(X1,join(meet(X1,X2),X3)) = meet(X1,join(meet(X3,X1),X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_19]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    meet(r1,meet(X1,join(a,b))) = n0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,axiom,
    join(X1,n0) = X1,
    x_join_0 ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    join(b,a2) = join(b,r1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    meet(X1,join(meet(X1,X2),X3)) = meet(X1,join(X2,meet(X3,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    meet(b,r1) = n0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_17]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    join(n0,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)) = meet(X2,meet(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_19]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a2,join(b,r1)) = a2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    meet(X1,meet(join(X1,X2),X3)) = meet(X1,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    meet(join(a,b),join(b,r1)) = b,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_26]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    meet(b,join(r1,meet(X1,b))) = meet(b,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    join(r1,meet(a,r2)) = b2,
    define_b2 ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a2,meet(X1,join(b,r1))) = meet(X1,a2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,join(b,r1)) = meet(a,b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    meet(X1,meet(X2,X3)) = meet(X3,meet(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    meet(b,join(r1,meet(b,X1))) = meet(b,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    meet(b,meet(r2,a2)) = meet(b,r2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_34]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    meet(X1,meet(X2,X1)) = meet(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    meet(r2,meet(a,b)) = n0,
    r2_complement_meet_a_b_2 ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    join(a,b2) = join(a,r1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    meet(r1,a2) = r1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,meet(b,a2)) = meet(a,a2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]),c_0_50]),c_0_19]),c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    meet(b,a2) = meet(b,r2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,meet(b,r2)) = n0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]),c_0_21]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    meet(b2,join(a,r1)) = b2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    join(r1,meet(X1,a2)) = meet(a2,join(r1,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_56]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,a2) = n0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]),c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a2,b2) != r1,
    prove_SAMs_lemma ).

cnf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
    meet(b2,meet(X1,join(a,r1))) = meet(X1,b2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a2,join(a,r1)) = r1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]),c_0_37]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
    meet(r1,b2) = r1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
    meet(b2,a2) != r1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]),c_0_19]),c_0_66]),c_0_19]),c_0_67]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.35  % Problem    : LAT005-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.12/0.37  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.67  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.67  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.67  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.67  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.67  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.67  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.68  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.68  % DateTime   : Thu Aug 24 07:16:51 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.68  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.06  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.23/1.31  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.23/1.31  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/1.31  % Proof found
% 0.23/1.31  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/1.31  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.34  % Total time : 0.247000 s
% 0.23/1.34  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.23/1.34  % Total time : 0.249000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------