TSTP Solution File: LAT005-2 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : LAT005-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 22:49:29 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.02s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP21479/LAT/LAT005-2+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 192] [nf = 0] [nu = 182] [ut = 93]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1193] [nf = 164] [nu = 1011] [ut = 136]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 174242] [nf = 608] [nu = 94310] [ut = 460]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 60 secs [nr = 5866210] [nf = 5708] [nu = 3727047] [ut = 2336]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 9584303] [nf = 10176] [nu = 5515016] [ut = 2584]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 9593754] [nf = 10340] [nu = 5524295] [ut = 2584]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 130 secs [nr = 10452336] [nf = 11026] [nu = 6047037] [ut = 2592]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 24093010
% 	resolvents: 24044025	factors: 48985
% Number of unit clauses generated: 12854494
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 53.35
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 21	[1] = 72	[2] = 43	[3] = 332	
% [4] = 2748	[5] = 248	
% Total = 3464
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 12854494	[2] = 10887886	[3] = 349792	[4] = 828	[5] = 10	
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] join_3		(+)117	(-)1628
% [1] meet_3		(+)127	(-)1592
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)244	(-)3220
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 3464
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 482023
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 24093010
% Number of unification failures: 1227083488
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 392660
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 30051868
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3296451
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 8089860
% Max entries in substitution set: 15
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 11575076
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 631
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 10392
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.01
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.06
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 48
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 1251176498
% ConstructUnitClause() = 11578519
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 12.77 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 80310
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------