TSTP Solution File: KRS265+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem : KRS265+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:32:18 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 2.33s 2.53s
% Output : Proof 2.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : KRS265+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 18:18:05 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 2.33/2.53 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.33/2.53 (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 2.33/2.53 (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 2.33/2.53 % SZS output start Proof
% 2.33/2.53 1. (model T_0 T_1) (-. (model T_0 T_1)) ### Axiom
% 2.33/2.53 2. (All I, (-. (model I T_1))) (model T_0 T_1) ### All 1
% 2.33/2.53 3. (-. ((model T_0 T_1) => (model T_0 T_2))) (All I, (-. (model I T_1))) ### NotImply 2
% 2.33/2.53 4. (-. (All I1, ((model I1 T_1) => (model I1 T_2)))) (All I, (-. (model I T_1))) ### NotAllEx 3
% 2.33/2.53 5. (model T_3 T_1) (-. (model T_3 T_1)) ### Axiom
% 2.33/2.53 6. (All I, (-. (model I T_1))) (model T_3 T_1) ### All 5
% 2.33/2.53 7. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)) (All I, (-. (model I T_1))) ### Exists 6
% 2.33/2.53 8. (-. (-. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)))) (All I, (-. (model I T_1))) ### NotNot 7
% 2.33/2.53 9. (-. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1))) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)) ### Axiom
% 2.33/2.53 10. (-. (-. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)))) (-. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1))) ### NotNot 9
% 2.33/2.53 11. (-. (status T_1 T_2 (cax))) (status T_1 T_2 (cax)) ### Axiom
% 2.33/2.53 12. ((-. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1))) <=> (status T_1 T_2 (cax))) (-. (status T_1 T_2 (cax))) (-. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1))) ### Equiv 10 11
% 2.33/2.53 13. (All C, ((-. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1))) <=> (status T_1 C (cax)))) (-. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1))) (-. (status T_1 T_2 (cax))) ### All 12
% 2.33/2.53 14. ((-. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1))) <=> (status T_1 zenon_X4 (cax))) (-. (status T_1 T_2 (cax))) (All C, ((-. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1))) <=> (status T_1 C (cax)))) (All I, (-. (model I T_1))) ### Equiv 8 13
% 2.33/2.53 15. (All I, (-. (model I T_1))) (All C, ((-. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1))) <=> (status T_1 C (cax)))) (-. (status T_1 T_2 (cax))) ### All 14
% 2.33/2.53 16. (All Ax, (All C, ((-. (Ex I1, (model I1 Ax))) <=> (status Ax C (cax))))) (-. (status T_1 T_2 (cax))) (All I, (-. (model I T_1))) ### All 15
% 2.33/2.53 17. (status T_1 T_2 (thm)) (-. (status T_1 T_2 (thm))) ### Axiom
% 2.33/2.53 18. (-. ((status T_1 T_2 (cax)) /\ (status T_1 T_2 (thm)))) (status T_1 T_2 (thm)) (All I, (-. (model I T_1))) (All Ax, (All C, ((-. (Ex I1, (model I1 Ax))) <=> (status Ax C (cax))))) ### NotAnd 16 17
% 2.33/2.53 19. (-. (Ex C, ((status T_1 C (cax)) /\ (status T_1 C (thm))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((-. (Ex I1, (model I1 Ax))) <=> (status Ax C (cax))))) (All I, (-. (model I T_1))) (status T_1 T_2 (thm)) ### NotExists 18
% 2.33/2.53 20. ((All I1, ((model I1 T_1) => (model I1 T_2))) <=> (status T_1 T_2 (thm))) (All Ax, (All C, ((-. (Ex I1, (model I1 Ax))) <=> (status Ax C (cax))))) (-. (Ex C, ((status T_1 C (cax)) /\ (status T_1 C (thm))))) (All I, (-. (model I T_1))) ### Equiv 4 19
% 2.33/2.53 21. (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 T_1) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status T_1 C (thm)))) (All I, (-. (model I T_1))) (-. (Ex C, ((status T_1 C (cax)) /\ (status T_1 C (thm))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((-. (Ex I1, (model I1 Ax))) <=> (status Ax C (cax))))) ### All 20
% 2.33/2.53 22. (All Ax, (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status Ax C (thm))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((-. (Ex I1, (model I1 Ax))) <=> (status Ax C (cax))))) (-. (Ex C, ((status T_1 C (cax)) /\ (status T_1 C (thm))))) (All I, (-. (model I T_1))) ### All 21
% 2.33/2.53 23. (-. (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((status Ax C (cax)) /\ (status Ax C (thm)))))) (All I, (-. (model I T_1))) (All Ax, (All C, ((-. (Ex I1, (model I1 Ax))) <=> (status Ax C (cax))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status Ax C (thm))))) ### NotExists 22
% 2.33/2.53 24. (Ex F, (All I, (-. (model I F)))) (All Ax, (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status Ax C (thm))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((-. (Ex I1, (model I1 Ax))) <=> (status Ax C (cax))))) (-. (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((status Ax C (cax)) /\ (status Ax C (thm)))))) ### Exists 23
% 2.33/2.53 25. (-. (mighta (cax) (thm))) (All Ax, (All C, ((-. (Ex I1, (model I1 Ax))) <=> (status Ax C (cax))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status Ax C (thm))))) (Ex F, (All I, (-. (model I F)))) ### Definition-Pseudo(mighta) 24
% 2.33/2.53 % SZS output end Proof
% 2.33/2.53 (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------