TSTP Solution File: KRS264+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : KRS264+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:00:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 122 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 23 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 139 ( 51 ~; 59 |; 23 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 78 ( 23 sgn 29 !; 10 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thm,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ! [X3] :
( model(X3,X1)
=> model(X3,X2) )
<=> status(X1,X2,thm) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',thm) ).
fof(mixed_pair,axiom,
? [X1,X2] :
( ? [X3] : model(X3,X1)
& ! [X4] :
( model(X4,X1)
=> model(X4,X2) )
& ? [X5] :
( ~ model(X5,X1)
& model(X5,X2) )
& ? [X6] : ~ model(X6,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',mixed_pair) ).
fof(mighta_wth_thm,conjecture,
mighta(wth,thm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mighta_wth_thm) ).
fof(mighta,axiom,
! [X7,X8] :
( ? [X1,X2] :
( status(X1,X2,X7)
& status(X1,X2,X8) )
<=> mighta(X7,X8) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',mighta) ).
fof(wth,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ? [X3] : model(X3,X1)
& ! [X4] :
( model(X4,X1)
=> model(X4,X2) )
& ? [X5] :
( model(X5,X2)
& ~ model(X5,X1) )
& ? [X6] : ~ model(X6,X2) )
<=> status(X1,X2,wth) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',wth) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X4,X5,X4,X5,X7] :
( ( model(esk3_2(X4,X5),X4)
| status(X4,X5,thm) )
& ( ~ model(esk3_2(X4,X5),X5)
| status(X4,X5,thm) )
& ( ~ status(X4,X5,thm)
| ~ model(X7,X4)
| model(X7,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X10] :
( model(esk20_0,esk18_0)
& ( ~ model(X10,esk18_0)
| model(X10,esk19_0) )
& ~ model(esk21_0,esk18_0)
& model(esk21_0,esk19_0)
& ~ model(esk22_0,esk19_0) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mixed_pair])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( status(X1,X2,thm)
| ~ model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( model(X1,esk19_0)
| ~ model(X1,esk18_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ mighta(wth,thm),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[mighta_wth_thm]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X9,X10,X11,X12,X9,X10] :
( ( ~ status(X11,X12,X9)
| ~ status(X11,X12,X10)
| mighta(X9,X10) )
& ( status(esk1_2(X9,X10),esk2_2(X9,X10),X9)
| ~ mighta(X9,X10) )
& ( status(esk1_2(X9,X10),esk2_2(X9,X10),X10)
| ~ mighta(X9,X10) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mighta])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( status(X1,esk19_0,thm)
| ~ model(esk3_2(X1,esk19_0),esk18_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( status(X1,X2,thm)
| model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9,X11,X12,X7,X8,X14] :
( ( model(esk4_2(X7,X8),X7)
| ~ model(X9,X7)
| ~ model(X11,X8)
| model(X11,X7)
| model(X12,X8)
| status(X7,X8,wth) )
& ( ~ model(esk4_2(X7,X8),X8)
| ~ model(X9,X7)
| ~ model(X11,X8)
| model(X11,X7)
| model(X12,X8)
| status(X7,X8,wth) )
& ( model(esk5_2(X7,X8),X7)
| ~ status(X7,X8,wth) )
& ( ~ model(X14,X7)
| model(X14,X8)
| ~ status(X7,X8,wth) )
& ( model(esk6_2(X7,X8),X8)
| ~ status(X7,X8,wth) )
& ( ~ model(esk6_2(X7,X8),X7)
| ~ status(X7,X8,wth) )
& ( ~ model(esk7_2(X7,X8),X8)
| ~ status(X7,X8,wth) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[wth])])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ mighta(wth,thm),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( mighta(X1,X2)
| ~ status(X3,X4,X2)
| ~ status(X3,X4,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
status(esk18_0,esk19_0,thm),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( status(X1,X2,wth)
| model(X3,X2)
| model(X4,X1)
| model(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ model(X4,X2)
| ~ model(X5,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
model(esk20_0,esk18_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ mighta(wth,thm),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( mighta(X1,thm)
| ~ status(esk18_0,esk19_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( status(X1,X2,wth)
| model(X3,X2)
| model(X4,X1)
| ~ model(X4,X2)
| ~ model(X5,X1)
| ~ model(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( status(esk18_0,X1,wth)
| model(esk4_2(esk18_0,X1),esk18_0)
| model(X2,esk18_0)
| model(X3,X1)
| ~ model(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
model(esk21_0,esk19_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ status(esk18_0,esk19_0,wth),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
~ model(esk21_0,esk18_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( status(X1,esk19_0,wth)
| model(X2,esk19_0)
| model(X3,X1)
| ~ model(esk4_2(X1,esk19_0),esk18_0)
| ~ model(X3,esk19_0)
| ~ model(X4,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( model(esk4_2(esk18_0,esk19_0),esk18_0)
| model(X1,esk19_0) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( model(X1,esk19_0)
| model(X2,esk18_0)
| model(X3,esk19_0)
| ~ model(X2,esk19_0)
| ~ model(X4,esk18_0) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( model(X1,esk19_0)
| model(X2,esk19_0)
| ~ model(X3,esk18_0) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_23]),c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( model(X1,esk19_0)
| model(X2,esk19_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
~ model(esk22_0,esk19_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
model(X1,esk19_0),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : KRS264+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 09:33:20 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 0.22/1.41
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 34
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 23
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 11
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 0.22/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 33
% 0.22/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 23
% 0.22/1.41 # Initial clauses : 29
% 0.22/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 29
% 0.22/1.41 # Processed clauses : 138
% 0.22/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.22/1.41 # ...subsumed : 20
% 0.22/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 116
% 0.22/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 16
% 0.22/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.22/1.41 # Generated clauses : 535
% 0.22/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 480
% 0.22/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 6
% 0.22/1.41 # Paramodulations : 533
% 0.22/1.41 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.22/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 97
% 0.22/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.22/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 14
% 0.22/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 70
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 189
% 0.22/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 1086
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 19
% 0.22/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1096
% 0.22/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 715
% 0.22/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 30
% 0.22/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 103
% 0.22/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 14
% 0.22/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 5
% 0.22/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 12131
% 0.22/1.41
% 0.22/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.41 # User time : 0.027 s
% 0.22/1.41 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.22/1.41 # Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.22/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 3560 pages
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------