TSTP Solution File: KRS262+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : KRS262+1 : TPTP v5.3.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : glasgow.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU          6600  @ 2.40GHz @ 2400MHz
% Memory   : 1003MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jun 15 10:58:06 EDT 2012

% Result   : Theorem 0.40s
% Output   : Solution 0.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP28396/KRS262+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP28396/KRS262+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP28396/KRS262+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.5/eproof_ram --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-format /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 28494
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.01 WC
% # Auto-Ordering is analysing problem.
% # Problem is type GHNFNFFMM21LS
% # Auto-mode selected ordering type KBO6
% # Auto-mode selected ordering precedence scheme <invfreq>
% # Auto-mode selected weight ordering scheme <invfreqrank>
% #
% # Auto-Heuristic is analysing problem.
% # Problem is type GHNFNFFMM21LS
% # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___006_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S2S
% # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% #
% # No equality, disabling AC handling.
% #
% # Initializing proof state
% # Proof found!
% # SZS status Theorem
% # Parsed axioms                      : 33
% # Removed by relevancy pruning       : 0
% # Initial clauses                    : 109
% # Removed in clause preprocessing    : 0
% # Initial clauses in saturation      : 109
% # Processed clauses                  : 650
% # ...of these trivial                : 50
% # ...subsumed                        : 16
% # ...remaining for further processing: 584
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 1
% # Generated clauses                  : 4455
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2198
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 4451
% # Factorizations                     : 4
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 583
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 139
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 6
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 438
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1637
% # ...number of literals in the above : 3856
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 30745
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24948
% # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions: 13
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3994
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # BW rewrite match attempts          : 418
% # BW rewrite match successes         : 1
% # Backwards rewriting index :  1990 nodes,   342 leaves,   1.70+/-3.230 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index      :   744 nodes,   143 leaves,   1.16+/-0.882 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index      :  1271 nodes,   221 leaves,   1.11+/-0.716 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-neg-atom index  :   714 nodes,   132 leaves,   1.38+/-3.178 terms/leaf
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(?[X3]:?[X4]:(status(X3,X4,X1)&status(X3,X4,X2))<=>mighta(X1,X2)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', mighta)).
% fof(2, axiom,![X3]:![X4]:(![X5]:(model(X5,X3)=>model(X5,X4))<=>status(X3,X4,thm)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', thm)).
% fof(3, axiom,![X3]:![X4]:(![X5]:(model(X5,X3)&model(X5,X4))<=>status(X3,X4,tau)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', tau)).
% fof(4, axiom,?[X6]:![X7]:model(X7,X6),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', tautology)).
% fof(33, conjecture,mighta(tau,thm),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', mighta_tau_thm)).
% fof(34, negated_conjecture,~(mighta(tau,thm)),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[33])).
% fof(50, negated_conjecture,~(mighta(tau,thm)),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[34,theory(equality)])).
% fof(51, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((![X3]:![X4]:(~(status(X3,X4,X1))|~(status(X3,X4,X2)))|mighta(X1,X2))&(~(mighta(X1,X2))|?[X3]:?[X4]:(status(X3,X4,X1)&status(X3,X4,X2)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1])).
% fof(52, plain,(![X1]:![X2]:(![X3]:![X4]:(~(status(X3,X4,X1))|~(status(X3,X4,X2)))|mighta(X1,X2))&![X1]:![X2]:(~(mighta(X1,X2))|?[X3]:?[X4]:(status(X3,X4,X1)&status(X3,X4,X2)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[51])).
% fof(53, plain,(![X5]:![X6]:(![X7]:![X8]:(~(status(X7,X8,X5))|~(status(X7,X8,X6)))|mighta(X5,X6))&![X9]:![X10]:(~(mighta(X9,X10))|?[X11]:?[X12]:(status(X11,X12,X9)&status(X11,X12,X10)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[52])).
% fof(54, plain,(![X5]:![X6]:(![X7]:![X8]:(~(status(X7,X8,X5))|~(status(X7,X8,X6)))|mighta(X5,X6))&![X9]:![X10]:(~(mighta(X9,X10))|(status(esk1_2(X9,X10),esk2_2(X9,X10),X9)&status(esk1_2(X9,X10),esk2_2(X9,X10),X10)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[53])).
% fof(55, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:![X9]:![X10]:(((~(status(X7,X8,X5))|~(status(X7,X8,X6)))|mighta(X5,X6))&(~(mighta(X9,X10))|(status(esk1_2(X9,X10),esk2_2(X9,X10),X9)&status(esk1_2(X9,X10),esk2_2(X9,X10),X10)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[54])).
% fof(56, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:![X9]:![X10]:(((~(status(X7,X8,X5))|~(status(X7,X8,X6)))|mighta(X5,X6))&((status(esk1_2(X9,X10),esk2_2(X9,X10),X9)|~(mighta(X9,X10)))&(status(esk1_2(X9,X10),esk2_2(X9,X10),X10)|~(mighta(X9,X10))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[55])).
% cnf(59,plain,(mighta(X1,X2)|~status(X3,X4,X2)|~status(X3,X4,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[56])).
% fof(60, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((?[X5]:(model(X5,X3)&~(model(X5,X4)))|status(X3,X4,thm))&(~(status(X3,X4,thm))|![X5]:(~(model(X5,X3))|model(X5,X4)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(61, plain,(![X3]:![X4]:(?[X5]:(model(X5,X3)&~(model(X5,X4)))|status(X3,X4,thm))&![X3]:![X4]:(~(status(X3,X4,thm))|![X5]:(~(model(X5,X3))|model(X5,X4)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[60])).
% fof(62, plain,(![X6]:![X7]:(?[X8]:(model(X8,X6)&~(model(X8,X7)))|status(X6,X7,thm))&![X9]:![X10]:(~(status(X9,X10,thm))|![X11]:(~(model(X11,X9))|model(X11,X10)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[61])).
% fof(63, plain,(![X6]:![X7]:((model(esk3_2(X6,X7),X6)&~(model(esk3_2(X6,X7),X7)))|status(X6,X7,thm))&![X9]:![X10]:(~(status(X9,X10,thm))|![X11]:(~(model(X11,X9))|model(X11,X10)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[62])).
% fof(64, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X9]:![X10]:![X11]:(((model(esk3_2(X6,X7),X6)&~(model(esk3_2(X6,X7),X7)))|status(X6,X7,thm))&(~(status(X9,X10,thm))|(~(model(X11,X9))|model(X11,X10)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[63])).
% fof(65, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X9]:![X10]:![X11]:(((model(esk3_2(X6,X7),X6)|status(X6,X7,thm))&(~(model(esk3_2(X6,X7),X7))|status(X6,X7,thm)))&(~(status(X9,X10,thm))|(~(model(X11,X9))|model(X11,X10)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[64])).
% cnf(67,plain,(status(X1,X2,thm)|~model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[65])).
% cnf(68,plain,(status(X1,X2,thm)|model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[65])).
% fof(69, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((?[X5]:(~(model(X5,X3))|~(model(X5,X4)))|status(X3,X4,tau))&(~(status(X3,X4,tau))|![X5]:(model(X5,X3)&model(X5,X4)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% fof(70, plain,(![X3]:![X4]:((?[X5]:~(model(X5,X3))|?[X5]:~(model(X5,X4)))|status(X3,X4,tau))&![X3]:![X4]:(~(status(X3,X4,tau))|(![X5]:model(X5,X3)&![X5]:model(X5,X4)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[69])).
% fof(71, plain,(![X6]:![X7]:((?[X8]:~(model(X8,X6))|?[X9]:~(model(X9,X7)))|status(X6,X7,tau))&![X10]:![X11]:(~(status(X10,X11,tau))|(![X12]:model(X12,X10)&![X13]:model(X13,X11)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[70])).
% fof(72, plain,(![X6]:![X7]:((~(model(esk4_2(X6,X7),X6))|~(model(esk5_2(X6,X7),X7)))|status(X6,X7,tau))&![X10]:![X11]:(~(status(X10,X11,tau))|(![X12]:model(X12,X10)&![X13]:model(X13,X11)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[71])).
% fof(73, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X10]:![X11]:![X12]:![X13]:(((~(model(esk4_2(X6,X7),X6))|~(model(esk5_2(X6,X7),X7)))|status(X6,X7,tau))&(~(status(X10,X11,tau))|(model(X12,X10)&model(X13,X11)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[72])).
% fof(74, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X10]:![X11]:![X12]:![X13]:(((~(model(esk4_2(X6,X7),X6))|~(model(esk5_2(X6,X7),X7)))|status(X6,X7,tau))&((model(X12,X10)|~(status(X10,X11,tau)))&(model(X13,X11)|~(status(X10,X11,tau))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[73])).
% cnf(77,plain,(status(X1,X2,tau)|~model(esk5_2(X1,X2),X2)|~model(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[74])).
% fof(78, plain,?[X8]:![X9]:model(X9,X8),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[4])).
% fof(79, plain,![X9]:model(X9,esk6_0),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[78])).
% cnf(80,plain,(model(X1,esk6_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[79])).
% cnf(325,negated_conjecture,(~mighta(tau,thm)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[50])).
% cnf(359,plain,(status(X1,X1,thm)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[67,68,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(402,plain,(status(esk6_0,X1,tau)|~model(esk5_2(esk6_0,X1),X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[77,80,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(716,plain,(mighta(X1,thm)|~status(X2,X2,X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[59,359,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(7939,plain,(status(esk6_0,esk6_0,tau)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[402,80,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(7951,plain,(mighta(tau,thm)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[716,7939,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(7961,plain,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[7951,325,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(7962,plain,($false),7961,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% PrfWatch: 0.12 CPU 0.11 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.12 CPU 0.11 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP28396/KRS262+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------