TSTP Solution File: KRS260+1 by lazyCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem : KRS260+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:13:22 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 69.81s 9.60s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : KRS260+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.16/0.36 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.16/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 14:48:50 EDT 2022
% 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 69.81/9.60 % SZS status Theorem
% 69.81/9.60 % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c0, axiom,
% 69.81/9.60 ~mighta(wec,thm)).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c1, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 ~mighta(wec,thm),
% 69.81/9.60 inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 69.81/9.60
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c2, axiom,
% 69.81/9.60 mighta(X0,X1) | ~status(X2,X3,X1) | ~status(X2,X3,X0)).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a0, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 wec = X0).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a1, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 thm = X1).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c3, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 $false,
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c4, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 ~status(X2,X3,X1) | ~status(X2,X3,X0),
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 69.81/9.60
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c5, axiom,
% 69.81/9.60 status(X4,X5,thm) | ~model(sK17(X4,X5),X5)).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a2, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 X2 = X4).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a3, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 X3 = X5).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a4, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 X1 = thm).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c6, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 ~status(X2,X3,X0),
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3, a4])], [c4, c5])).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c7, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 ~model(sK17(X4,X5),X5),
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3, a4])], [c4, c5])).
% 69.81/9.60
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c8, axiom,
% 69.81/9.60 model(X6,sK59)).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a5, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 sK17(X4,X5) = X6).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a6, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 X5 = sK59).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c9, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 $false,
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a5, a6])], [c7, c8])).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c10, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 $false,
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a5, a6])], [c7, c8])).
% 69.81/9.60
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c11, axiom,
% 69.81/9.60 status(X7,X8,wec) | ~sP3(X8,X7)).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a7, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 X2 = X7).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a8, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 X3 = X8).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a9, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 X0 = wec).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c12, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 $false,
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a7, a8, a9])], [c6, c11])).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c13, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 ~sP3(X8,X7),
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a7, a8, a9])], [c6, c11])).
% 69.81/9.60
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c14, axiom,
% 69.81/9.60 sP3(X9,X10) | ~sP2(X10,X9) | ~model(sK22(X9,X10),X9) | ~model(X11,X10)).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a10, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 X8 = X9).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a11, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 X7 = X10).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c15, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 $false,
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a10, a11])], [c13, c14])).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c16, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 ~sP2(X10,X9) | ~model(sK22(X9,X10),X9) | ~model(X11,X10),
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a10, a11])], [c13, c14])).
% 69.81/9.60
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c17, axiom,
% 69.81/9.60 sP2(X12,X13) | model(X14,X12) | ~model(X14,X13)).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a12, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 X10 = X12).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a13, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 X9 = X13).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c18, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 ~model(sK22(X9,X10),X9) | ~model(X11,X10),
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a12, a13])], [c16, c17])).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c19, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 model(X14,X12) | ~model(X14,X13),
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a12, a13])], [c16, c17])).
% 69.81/9.60
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c20, axiom,
% 69.81/9.60 ~model(sK61,sK60)).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a14, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 X14 = sK61).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a15, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 X12 = sK60).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c21, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 ~model(X14,X13),
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a14, a15])], [c19, c20])).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c22, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 $false,
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a14, a15])], [c19, c20])).
% 69.81/9.60
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c23, axiom,
% 69.81/9.60 model(X15,sK59)).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a16, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 X14 = X15).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a17, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 X13 = sK59).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c24, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 $false,
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a16, a17])], [c21, c23])).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c25, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 $false,
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a16, a17])], [c21, c23])).
% 69.81/9.60
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c26, axiom,
% 69.81/9.60 model(X16,sK59)).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a18, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 sK22(X9,X10) = X16).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a19, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 X9 = sK59).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c27, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 ~model(X11,X10),
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a18, a19])], [c18, c26])).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c28, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 $false,
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a18, a19])], [c18, c26])).
% 69.81/9.60
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c29, axiom,
% 69.81/9.60 model(sK62,sK60)).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a20, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 X11 = sK62).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(a21, assumption,
% 69.81/9.60 X10 = sK60).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c30, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 $false,
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a20, a21])], [c27, c29])).
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c31, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 $false,
% 69.81/9.60 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a20, a21])], [c27, c29])).
% 69.81/9.60
% 69.81/9.60 cnf(c32, plain,
% 69.81/9.60 $false,
% 69.81/9.60 inference(constraint_solving, [
% 69.81/9.60 bind(X0, wec),
% 69.81/9.60 bind(X1, thm),
% 69.81/9.60 bind(X2, sK60),
% 69.81/9.60 bind(X3, sK59),
% 69.81/9.60 bind(X4, sK60),
% 69.81/9.60 bind(X5, sK59),
% 69.81/9.60 bind(X6, sK17(X4,X5)),
% 69.81/9.60 bind(X7, sK60),
% 69.81/9.60 bind(X8, sK59),
% 69.81/9.60 bind(X9, sK59),
% 69.81/9.60 bind(X10, sK60),
% 69.81/9.60 bind(X11, sK62),
% 69.81/9.60 bind(X12, sK60),
% 69.81/9.60 bind(X13, sK59),
% 69.81/9.60 bind(X14, sK61),
% 69.81/9.60 bind(X15, sK61),
% 69.81/9.60 bind(X16, sK22(X9,X10))
% 69.81/9.60 ],
% 69.81/9.60 [a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10, a11, a12, a13, a14, a15, a16, a17, a18, a19, a20, a21])).
% 69.81/9.60
% 69.81/9.60 % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------