TSTP Solution File: KRS254+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : KRS254+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:56:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 4.34s 2.20s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.34s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_77,plain,
( status(X1,X2,thm)
| ~ model(esk51_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-af1iu26s/input.p',i_0_77) ).
cnf(i_0_72,plain,
model(X1,esk48_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-af1iu26s/input.p',i_0_72) ).
cnf(i_0_29,plain,
( mighta(X1,X2)
| ~ status(X3,X4,X2)
| ~ status(X3,X4,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-af1iu26s/input.p',i_0_29) ).
cnf(i_0_81,plain,
( status(X1,X2,unp)
| ~ model(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-af1iu26s/input.p',i_0_81) ).
cnf(i_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ mighta(unp,thm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-af1iu26s/input.p',i_0_30) ).
cnf(c_0_87,plain,
( status(X1,X2,thm)
| ~ model(esk51_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
i_0_77 ).
cnf(c_0_88,plain,
model(X1,esk48_0),
i_0_72 ).
cnf(c_0_89,plain,
( mighta(X1,X2)
| ~ status(X3,X4,X2)
| ~ status(X3,X4,X1) ),
i_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_90,plain,
status(X1,esk48_0,thm),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_88]) ).
cnf(c_0_91,plain,
( status(X1,X2,unp)
| ~ model(X3,X1) ),
i_0_81 ).
cnf(c_0_92,plain,
( mighta(X1,thm)
| ~ status(X2,esk48_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_90]) ).
cnf(c_0_93,plain,
status(esk48_0,X1,unp),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_88]) ).
cnf(c_0_94,negated_conjecture,
~ mighta(unp,thm),
i_0_30 ).
cnf(c_0_95,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_92,c_0_93]),c_0_94]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : KRS254+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 14:58:25 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.43 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.44 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 4.34/2.20 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 4.34/2.20 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 4.34/2.20 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 4.34/2.20
% 4.34/2.20 # Proof found!
% 4.34/2.20 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.34/2.20 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.34/2.20 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 4.34/2.20 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 4.34/2.20 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 4.34/2.20 # Proof object conjectures : 2
% 4.34/2.20 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 4.34/2.20 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 4.34/2.20 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 4.34/2.20 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 4.34/2.20 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 4.34/2.20 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 4.34/2.20 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.34/2.20 # Parsed axioms : 109
% 4.34/2.20 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 4.34/2.20 # Initial clauses : 109
% 4.34/2.20 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 4.34/2.20 # Initial clauses in saturation : 109
% 4.34/2.20 # Processed clauses : 206
% 4.34/2.20 # ...of these trivial : 10
% 4.34/2.20 # ...subsumed : 4
% 4.34/2.20 # ...remaining for further processing : 192
% 4.34/2.20 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 4.34/2.20 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 4.34/2.20 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 4.34/2.20 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 4.34/2.20 # Generated clauses : 1654
% 4.34/2.20 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1617
% 4.34/2.20 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 4.34/2.20 # Paramodulations : 1654
% 4.34/2.20 # Factorizations : 0
% 4.34/2.20 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 4.34/2.20 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 4.34/2.20 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 4.34/2.20 # Current number of processed clauses : 192
% 4.34/2.20 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 50
% 4.34/2.20 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 4.34/2.20 # Negative unit clauses : 26
% 4.34/2.20 # Non-unit-clauses : 116
% 4.34/2.20 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1517
% 4.34/2.20 # ...number of literals in the above : 4053
% 4.34/2.20 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 4.34/2.20 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 4.34/2.20 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2449
% 4.34/2.20 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1419
% 4.34/2.20 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 4.34/2.20 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1381
% 4.34/2.20 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 4.34/2.20 # BW rewrite match attempts : 42
% 4.34/2.20 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 4.34/2.20 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 4.34/2.20 # Condensation successes : 0
% 4.34/2.20 # Termbank termtop insertions : 18436
% 4.34/2.20
% 4.34/2.20 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.34/2.20 # User time : 0.023 s
% 4.34/2.20 # System time : 0.004 s
% 4.34/2.20 # Total time : 0.027 s
% 4.34/2.20 # ...preprocessing : 0.012 s
% 4.34/2.20 # ...main loop : 0.016 s
% 4.34/2.20 # Maximum resident set size: 7136 pages
% 4.34/2.20
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------